Secretary Pete: ‘Remove City Highways To Fix Racial Inequities’


Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said on Monday that his agency would use a part of the $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill to address racial inequities in U.S. highway design.

The program, called “Reconnecting Communities,” will focus on the “legacy of highway construction built through communities” and remove or repurpose infrastructure barriers. (Worth taking the ride out to the link.)

The GOP is quick to point out that the latest spend-a-rama bill just passed only has about ten percent for infrastructure as we know it. There is precious little discussed of the remaining 90 percent. Try as I might, I can only find a broad brush of it. But here is one jewel that deserves our attention:

Tucked in amid larger pots of money is $20 billion to “reconnect neighborhoods cut off by historic investments (in infrastructure)” and to ensure new projects advance racial and environmental justice.

Critics say it could produce unintended consequences such as more traffic congestion in local neighborhoods — especially if it leads to closing or significantly altering highways, as some cities are contemplating.

Some cities, such as Syracuse, N.Y., want to tear down portions of urban highways, restore old street grids and redevelop neighborhoods. O’Toole is skeptical, saying highway demolition could increase traffic congestion in local neighborhoods and lead to other unintended consequences.

“I’m afraid what we’re going to see with this $20 billion is anti-road people tearing out roads,” O’Toole said.

So far, no one is suggesting that will happen in Atlanta. But there are proposals to build parks over the Downtown Connector. Williams recently requested nearly $1.2 million in federal funding for one of those projects, “The Stitch,” which would cover the highway between the MARTA Civic Center station and Piedmont Road.

“I think our communities are trying to figure out how to reconnect, and have had some success,” said A.J. Robinson, president of Central Atlanta Progress, which proposed The Stitch. “We just need more connections.”

Read more AJC

Reply comments:

Hey Pete, Those of us alive at the time know this.  That Parkway & others in cities across America, were built for Automobiles Only. No trucks No buses. Twas so the family could take a trip in a car w/out dealing w/ 24k-40k lb trucks wearing out the road & spewing diesel. Fyi.  Don’t the low bridges block white kids too?? A reply: I’m black. Been black all my life. I know how to drive a car.

You could try: “Thank you Sec. Pete. This is a wonderful thing. Excuse me while I go talk to my lawyer about my upcoming arrest for sedition.Image

 

Just like we really have nothing to lose by confronting the simple reality that he wasn’t entitled to maternity leave. And we have everything to gain by acknowledging this fact and then dealing with his scam.

Image

 

We pick up the story line from the NYT:

In the past, “we created a way for people to get on a highway and go directly out of our community,” she said, adding that highways also created “barriers that were really detrimental to the communities left behind.”

Now, Rochester is trying a different approach: Instead of moving people in and out of downtown as quickly as possible, the city is trying to make downtown a more livable place.

The highway removal and other deconstruction projects are part of a long-term plan for a city still struggling to come back from years of economic and population decline. The big bet: Rebuilding more walkable, bikeable and connected neighborhoods will attract new investment and new residents. And city officials hope it might even reduce car-dependence in the long run.

More New York Times

And how are things working out in New York City? 

New York City has intentionally caused the traffic nightmare

Time for some traffic problems in Manhattan!

City officials have intentionally ground Midtown to a halt with the hidden purpose of making drivers so miserable that they leave their cars at home and turn to mass transit or bicycles, high-level sources told The Post.

Today’s gridlock is the result of an effort by the Bloomberg and de Blasio administrations over more than a decade of redesigning streets and ramping up police efforts, the sources said.

“The traffic is being engineered,” a former top NYPD official told The Post, explaining a long-term plan that began under Mayor Mike Bloomberg and hasn’t slowed with Mayor de Blasio.

“The city streets are being engineered to create traffic congestion, to slow traffic down, to favor bikers and pedestrians,” the former official said.

“There’s a reduction in capacity through the introduction of bike lanes and streets and lanes being closed down.”

The goal of the jammed traffic is to shift as many drivers as possible to public transit or bicycles.

More NY Post with the details of how they are carrying out their plan.

The very best of the swamp today.

For the best in conservative news push the button.

 

32 Responses to “Secretary Pete: ‘Remove City Highways To Fix Racial Inequities’”

  1. Baysider Says:

    So how does this square with the massive NAFTA super highway from Mexico to Canada?

    The ‘critics’ are wrongly quoted. Or rightly quoted with hidden motives. It will produce INTENDED consequences. I’ve been reading about this idea for decades. Some have suggested they forcibly move people out of natural habitat zones newly created throughout the country by highway removal. (Didn’t they learn their lesson with the Cherokees? Or maybe they DID!)

    Don’t forget the full name of these freeways: national defense highways. It’s interesting to read how Eisenhower led an army group in the 20’s to test and report on their ability to move an army on the existing road system. It was the birth of the interstate system – goaded on by commerce too, no doubt. So this movement is about a lot more than ‘restoring neighborhoods.’ It’s another wrecking ball to the economy – if anything is left after the covid fiasco.

    Yes, they want people out of cars so independent movement is quashed. It’s a reality that highway funds go farther when the land purchased is cheaper. It’s also easier to steamroller over poor people. Just is. Didn’t say that’s right, or won’t be brought up on Judgment Day, but it is what it is. Beverly Hills fought hard to make sure NO highway approached them. Olympic Blvd. (major urban artery skirting the south edge of BH) is the best we have to get there.

    I live on the edge of a major divide created by the 10 freeway. About 3 blocks north of that chasm still belongs to the old “Pico” neighborhood, but we never get representation because their interests are no longer ours. They built a train on ‘our’ side instead of central to the area (would have been a much better location for access by those needing it most) so 1) it’s harder for the ‘poorer’ side to use the public transport, and 2) easier for big retail spenders from poor neighborhoods to get to massive retail on ‘our’ side of the divide.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      Thanks for the reminder that the basis was for National defense. It is interesting about D.C. They wanted to extend the subway into Georgetown..made sense with all the government workers who could have had a fast ride downtown. But they didn’t want the riff raft traveling up their way last I heard. Pretty rich isn’t it? Not in my back yard. Same with the wind farms that the Kennedy’s didn’t want in their backyard either.

      Like

      • Baysider Says:

        Interesting about Georgetown. Woohoo! NIMBY! In our neighborhood, the train was touted as “easy public transit to work.” The huge office complexes end about a mile+ east of me. Still, they brought the train as far as me and the last 3,000 feet to the beach and all the retail. Demographics showed people from poorer neighborhoods were bigger spenders in our local retail. So … how can I not conclude they lied. It’s to serve the retail. Fine. Where’s transparency? Always using the shield of one purpose to cover another. No wonder people are suspicious of these loony plans. Real estate websites rated my neighborhood “green” for low crime just before the train opened. Six months later it’s “red.”

        Liked by 1 person

  2. peter3nj Says:

    Come 2022 it won’t take much to convince a majority of voters that only the democrats can fix the highways and byways they closed, tore up and rerouted after passing trillions to correct our racist transportation system regardless of how the brainiacs at FNC say otherwise. Get ready for it when supplemental bills are passed to pay for more stuff. One thing for sure we can depend on as in the past the republicans will do what they do best: snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
    PS: In other news Buttboy ignores the ever expanding traffic jam on the waters outside LA and Long Beach but who’s counting.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Mustang Says:

      I marvel at the consistency at which politicians are able to invent problems that aren’t and solutions that don’t. It’s enough to make one wonder if it’s a viable option to extend late-term abortion to around 39 or 40 postpartum years.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. markone1blog Says:

    According to that post during April, Mayor Pete said

    The American jobs plan is about a generational investment. It’s going to create 19 million jobs and we’re talking about economic growth that’s going to go on for years and years.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      Top down bottom up……think that is how it goes… break it all down and then rebuild and create the utopian society where we are can become hunter gathers.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Mustang Says:

      Significantly, no one asked what generational investment means, and no one asked him how he came up with his “19 million” figure. No one asked how many job losses would it take in order to create 19 million jobs, and no one knows what “years and years” means. I guess what Joel Harris told us about tar-babies is true.

      Liked by 2 people

      • bunkerville Says:

        Picky about the details Mustang… The GOP remained mute about the bill that passed. All they said was 10 percent was for infrastructure. Now we know what that means… zip.. and the 90 percent? I spent a couple of hours looking for one Republican to tell me what it was about. And turkey neck McConnell is pleased as punch it passed.

        Liked by 1 person

      • markone1blog Says:

        Their silence is most definitely a sad commentary on what is now called the Democrat Communication Wing.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Mustang Says:

        We were warned as early as the late 1600s, when certain elements of the British polity identified two threats to freedom. The first, a general moral decay which would invite the intrusion of evil and despotic rulers. The second, the encroachment of executive authority upon the legislature that would subdue human liberty, made possible by [politically] mixed government. Who were these “radical Whigs” of yesteryear? John Milton, John Locke, James Harrington, and Algernon Sydney. Of course, none of us know about this because most of us are “bored” with history.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bunkerville Says:

        Fortunately I got a healthy dose of the mentioned individuals. I was surprised that I found a number of them in various philosophy classes as opposed to history..Perhaps you aren’t.. If we thought history was a dying subject how about philosophy.

        Like

  4. markone1blog Says:

    When I first saw your post, I remembered having posted on this earlier. It only took a number of reviews of the Biden idiocy to locate the time Mayor Pete promised to create millions of jobs with an infrastructure bill. It seems he then planned to re-route “racist” freeways that once divided minority communities.

    So it looks like, in addition to high gas prices, we will be tearing up our freeways.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Mustang Says:

    Whenever I don’t understand something, I lean toward an examination of causes and effects. If one gives some thought to all the things in life that make them angry, disgusted, and/or depressed — whether those emotions are the result of war, unemployment, the non-availability of basic commodities, the costs of gas and utilities, disease, the fact that their offspring are too stupid after twelve years of public education to get into community college, cost of medications, traffic jams, filthy water, and high taxes at the local, state, and national level — and I’m sure I’ve left out a few, 95% of those things were caused by politicians and government policy.

    And this isn’t just a problem in the United States. In the 1980’s, political geniuses spared no expense informing the Brits that diesel engines in cars and trucks were better for the environment. The government offered incentives for people to get rid of their gasoline-powered cars for diesel. The result was that it would hard for anyone to find a country anywhere in the world that has more diesel-powered vehicles.

    In 2016, British politicians reversed themselves. Diesel is bad for environment, they proclaimed. Everyone must do the right thing for the country — indeed, for the world — and get rid of their diesel powered cars. Gasoline powered engines are cleaner. And to reinforce this new proclamation, the price on diesel skyrocketed, and taxes on diesel powered vehicles shot through the roof. Oh, and to make sure that everyone working in the major cities was paying attention, all diesel-powered cars had to have a special license to drive into London, Birmingham, Manchester, and Liverpool. But since you couldn’t get a license because they were carefully controlled and sparsely issued, you had to find some other way to get to work inside those cities … such as on diesel-powered or electrically powered trains.

    We may be a little smarter in this country, but if we are, it isn’t by much. I don’t see anyone lining up for an EV, so maybe there’s hope for us. Okay, I was just kidding. Of course, there isn’t. Has anyone driven through Atlanta recently? At, um … oh, around 4:00 to 6:00 pm? Chattanooga? Nashville? Louisville? Washington, D. C.? Houston? Dallas? Just imagine how much fun it will be driving back and forth to work once Butt-in-a-jug begins deconstructing highways that we’ve already spend a gazillion dollars building over the past 70 years — so that black kids can rob, rape, and murder one other in environmentally pleasing community-planned parks and bicycle paths! The potential joy of it overwhelms me.

    Liked by 3 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      “Just imagine how much fun it will be driving back and forth to work once Butt-in-a-jug begins deconstructing highways that we’ve already spend a gazillion dollars building over the past 70 years — so that black kids can rob, rape, and murder one other in environmentally pleasing community-planned parks and bicycle paths! The potential joy of it overwhelms me.”

      Atlanta is in their scope Mustang… Who in their right mind would consider this? Sad to say they think they are. They want to end the car. Period. Perverse and sick.

      They will start charging taxes per mile… that should do it for rural America and the revolution.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Mustang Says:

      I’m also guessing that highway deconstruction will improve the response time of emergency services and first responders. Man … those guys are good.

      Liked by 2 people

      • bunkerville Says:

        Their creativity knows no bounds…
        Back in 2010 I wrote a post
        LaHood: “We are going to “Coerce” people out of their cars March 25, 2010.

        LaHood signed the new policy directive on March 11. “This is the end of favoring motorized transportation at the expense of non-motorized.”

        On May 21, LaHood told reporters at the National Press Club that the “Partnership for Sustainable Communities’ his department had formed with the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Housing—sometimes known as the “livability initiative”–was designed to “coerce” people out of their cars.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Mustang Says:

        Well, I guess there are some people who’ve forgotten how well the Americans responded to the Coercive Acts of 1774. Proving once again that politicians aren’t all that smart — but maybe that’s a good thing.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bunkerville Says:

        That is we can find gas. He is going to empty are strategic stores…Trump had said they were almost empty when he got to D.C.. so the plan was already in the works.

        Like

  6. peter3nj Says:

    A verse in a 1968 song from a group called Marmalade goes”the world is a bad place a sad place a terrible place to Iive.”

    Liked by 2 people

  7. Always On Watch Says:

    Dear Lord! Is there no end to the insanity of Progressives?

    Liked by 4 people


Leave a comment