Hillary Clinton’s WH China was not enough, loads up leaving the State Dept.

Hillary rounds up some goodies as she exits the State Department door. Enough is never enough for our Socialists. Bernie Sanders moves on and buys his third house after his bid for the WH. Apparently Fauxcahantus is not going to be left in the dust either:

From Instapundit:

YOU STAY CLASSY, LIZ WARREN: Trump’s a ‘selfish little sleaze ball’

Speaking of selfish, Warren “got paid $350,000 to teach just one class at Harvard,” despite that school’s crushing tuition costs.

Recall my earlier post?

Why is Hillary measuring White House drapes in 2016, can’t she reference the ones she stole in 2000?


Yes, Hillary was never one to leave the towels behind:

Hillary Clinton and her staff may have lifted furniture from the State Department and moved it to her D.C. residence, according to a charge made in the latest round of notes from the FBI’s investigation of her private email server use, made public Monday.

The allegation is similar to charges made in January 2001, when President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton left the White House. Reports soon surfaced that publicly owned furniture and silverware had been taken by the Clintons.

The disclosure came from a former State Department security agent on Sept. 2, 2015, while the FBI was interviewing people about Clinton’s private email server. Clinton was secretary of state from 2009 to 2013. Using a private server to handle classified emails could constitute gross negligence under the law, but FBI Director James Comey opted not to recommend the Justice Department bring charges against Clinton.

But the FBI interviews released to the public on Monday contained other surprising allegations.

For one, the former State Department agent said Clinton and her staff were observed removing furniture and lamps early in 2009, when she took office as secretary of state at the Foggy Bottom offices.

More at Lifezette:

Mooch Obama and her confusing signals

A bit under the weather today. As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words, and this should do it. Call this a bit confusing.



Medical marijuana users now banned from owning or buying guns court rules

They are coming full bore at us in attempting to limit our Second Amendment rights. The wacko 9th Circuit has a new approach. I would ask them to explain the difference between alcohol and marijuana in making this determination. I wonder who is going to round up those who already have a gun?

If you have a medical marijuana card, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that you can’t buy a gun.

Earlier this week the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that medical marijuana card holders do not have a 2nd amendment right to buy or own a firearm. The ruling applies to the nine Western states that fall under the court’s jurisdiction, including California, Washington, Oregon, Arizona, Nevada, and Alaska.

On Wednesday, in a 3-0 decision, the 9th Circuit agreed that Congress had reasonably concluded that marijuana and other drug use “raises the risk of irrational or unpredictable behavior with which gun use should not be associated.” The court’s ruling applied to nine Western states within the appeals court’s jurisdiction, including six that have legalized marijuana for medical or recreational purposes: California, Washington, Oregon, Arizona, Nevada, and Alaska.

Rainey plans to appeal the decision saying,  “We live in a world where having a medical marijuana card is enough to say you don’t get a gun, but if you’re on the no-fly list your constitutional right is still protected.” … “We are going to litigate this, exhaust whatever remedies we have,” Rainey said. “When this (ATF) letter was issued, it was issued as part of a deliberate attempt by the (U.S. Department of Justice) to quell a political movement.” More at Off Grid Survival

This earlier post might be of interest:

Will taking an anxiety pill let Obama take your guns?

Obama opens all Federal building showers, bathrooms to trangendered

There was a time when men went to barber shops and talked what men talk about and women went to beauty salons and enjoyed trashy movie star magazines, caught up on the news of the neighborhood with a touch of gossip. Am I getting old? Now we are going to allow potential perverts without question into women’s showers and changing rooms in all federal buildings. By the way this includes National Parks for those of us who are campers. Here tis:

The Obama administration has ordered 9,000-plus federal buildings across the United States allow biological men into women’s bathrooms, locker rooms and showers in order to comply with the administration’s interpretation of Title IX law.

The order comes after the Department of Justice and Department of Education sent a significant guidance letter to all public school districts in May, advising them to allow transgender students to have access to bathrooms and locker rooms designated for the opposite biological sex.

The GSA guidance explains that individuals will not be required “to show proof of surgery to be treated in accordance with their gender identity and obtain access to the restroom corresponding with their gender identity.”

The bulletin adds that federal employers can not side-step the bulletin by requiring transgender individuals to use single-user restrooms.
As 24 states are suing the Obama administration over the public school transgender guidance, Severino asserts that legal action might be the only way to get a message across to the administration that the American people have not yet approved of its interpretation of Title IX
Read more at Christian Post

CNN’s Lesbian Sally Kohn defends Sharia law

Hint Sally, if one believes in Sharia one is not Progressive. Amazing isn’t it. How there is zero discussion of exactly what Sharia law entails and specifically how it handles the LGBT Community. Sally’s website says thus which no doubt explains her ignorance:

sally kohn

“a former community organizer who prefers baggy clothes and doesn’t own a television.” — The New York Times



Sally, who is gay and a CNN commentator might want to visit the CNN newsroom, take a look at some videos, especially this one done by CNN and watch how Sharia law deals with the LGBT Community since she doesn’t own a T.V.

Sally Kohn, a former senior strategist at the Soros-funded Center for Community Change, had been hired as a Fox News Contributor previously.

Kohn worked at the Center for Community Change, one of the leading Soros-funded groups, for six years, from 2004—2010. During this period, the group received $5.8 million from Soros’s main vehicle, the Open Society Institute (OSI).

“Sally Kohn makes the world safe for radical ideas,” her website says. In fact, Kohn is a far-left radical who attended the 2003 World Social Forum in Brazil, a meeting place for groups which say they are opposed to capitalism and U.S. imperialism. The 2011-2012 “Calendar of Struggles” for the World Social Forum Full Story at: Accuracy in Media From my previous post Soros activist hired by Fox. So much for fair and balanced. 

Hillary Clinton tells NAACP the police must ‘Stop the killings of African-Americans

While Clinton Cable News and MSNBC are frothing at the mouth regarding the possibility a few sentences at last night’s GOP convention were lifted from Mooch, the hildebeast moves on dividing and trying to shore up her base, agitating in a despicable way. So while the foam is still forming in the media’s mouths, the evil one moves on unnoticed.  She channels her inner religious camp meeting presentation style.

Just a day after three police officers were targeted and killed by a Muslim black nationalist in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Hillary Clinton is demanding that it’s the police who stop the violence.

Clinton spoke to the NAACP Monday, saying that law enforcement must “root out” biases against black Americans and stop killing them.

“We will not rest until we root out implicit bias and stop the killings of African-Americans,” Clinton told the crowd in a preacher-like tone.

“Many African-Americans fear the police,” Clinton said as the crowd erupted in agreement. “I can hear you. Some of you in this room.”

“And today, there are people all across America, sick over what happened in Baton Rouge and in Dallas, but also fearful that the murders of police officers mean that final questions about police-community relations will go unanswered.”


Obama set to regulate wine coolers

While the mayhem continues, I thought this story exemplifies all that we are fighting for in regard to keeping American companies alive, and workers employed. Tens of thousands of these regs were promulgated during this administration, with faceless, nameless bureaucrats, costing jobs and business their ability to thrive. Oh, testing I am sure is just the first step. We must get the foot of government off the necks of small business who employ 60 percent of Americans.

Energy efficiency reg to cost small businesses $12,500 each.The agency said the $12,500 testing cost is “unlikely to represent a significant economic impact for small businesses.”

The Department of Energy now has a specific regulation for wine refrigerators.

The agency released a final rule Friday requiring manufacturers to test the energy efficiency of refrigerators used for wine. It estimated the rule would cost the average small business $12,500 to test whether their equipment meets specifications.

The regulation refers to the refrigerators as “coolers.” There was much discussion about the exact definition of the term in the final regulation, which spans 159 pages.

“[The Department of Energy] DOE proposed to define a ‘cooler’ as a cabinet, used with one or more doors, that has a source of refrigeration capable of operating on single-phase, alternating current and is capable of maintaining compartment temperatures either no lower than 39 °F, or in a range that extends no lower than 37 °F but at least as high as 60 °F,” according to the final rule. “The proposal also clarified that these compartment temperatures would be determined in a 90 °F ambient temperature.”

The agency decided to keep the phrase “used with one or more doors” because it was “clearer and more direct.”

“If a product is used with one or more doors, it would be considered a cooler regardless of the design intent,” the agency said. “Therefore, DOE is maintaining the language of ‘used with one or more doors’ in the cooler definition as well as the combination cooler refrigeration product category definitions established in this final rule.”

More at Free Beacon

%d bloggers like this: