The Comey Fiasco

 

 

The Comey Fiasco

by Mustang

How to win leftist friends without really trying

I’ve been trying to figure out James Comey, 7th Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.  According to my understanding, Mr. Comey was, for most of his adult life, a registered Republican.  That changed in 2016 when he stated that politically, he is unaffiliated.

 

So, what happened in 2016?  In the news …

*Bernie Sanders was utterly destroyed by Hillary Clinton, after which she handily won the Democratic nomination for the presidency.

*Hillary Clinton seized the Democratic National Convention, and then drove that organization toward bankruptcy from such shenanigans as paying for a fake Dossier on Donald J. Trump, which from all accounts, cost the DNC millions of dollars.

*Black Lives Matter made it in to the political mainstream, which clearly must stand out as one of Barack Obama’s principal achievements.

*Elizabeth Warren challenged anyone to prove that she’s not a Native American.  If she is, then she must be one of the richest Indians on the continent.  Her Middlesex County wigwam cost multi-millions of wampum.  Later testing revealed that she’s actually 1/1,024th part Native American.  In making her claim, no one is quite sure which part she’s talking about.

*Bill Clinton met surreptitiously with Loretta Lynch, who was then serving as Attorney General of the United States.  As Attorney General, Lynch was Comey’s boss.

*Not long afterward, James Comey announced that he would not seek an indictment of Hillary Clinton over the now infamous email controversy.

*Four weeks before the 2016 general election, Comey drafted a letter exonerating Clinton for any wrong doing.

*Two weeks before the election, Comey stated that he would re-open the Clinton investigation.  Democrats claimed that Comey sabotaged Clinton’s chance of winning the election.

*Donald J. Trump surprised everyone by winning the general election and Hillary Clinton started hating Trump even more than she did before then —which, when you think about it, is an awful lot of hate for one person.

Of course, we can only guess about what was really going on.  Comey, a long-time Republican, suddenly unaffiliated, refused to ask for an indictment of Clinton in the face of overwhelming evidence that she willfully and intentionally violated federal law respecting the safeguarding of classified information.  This was after Bill’s meeting with Loretta.  Then, Comey did a 180 and “re-opened” the investigation.

Here’s my guess: Barack Obama did not want Clinton to succeed him.  Why? Because George Soros didn’t want Clinton to succeed Obama.  A republican in the White House for four years gives Georgie four years to look around for another Manchurian candidate.

What has Soros to do with Comey?  As my friend at Bunkerville keep’s reminding me, if you ever want to find the truth, follow the money.  I would like to know if Comey has an off-shore bank account and whether a very large sum of money was ever deposited there … oh, say, between two and four weeks before the general election.

 

Getting back to the Clinton email snafu, I heard today that a federal judge has ruled that Mrs. Clinton must answer questions under oath during a further inquiry into the events of the email escapade.  I presume that Judge Royce C. Lamberth will schedule a judicial hearing in the not-too-distance future.  If true, then 2019 should turn out to be a very happy new year for conservatives.  Removing this case from the halls of Congress to a federal courtroom seems like the right thing to do.

If there are any competing theories out there?  I’d love to hear them.  I love conspiracy theories.  There are so many possibilities about how this affair will turn out, and so little time.

 

(For those interested in Comey’s testimony on Friday the link is below)

Comey-interview-transcript-12-7-18_Redacted-1 (1)

Advertisements

The “Open Society” and George Soros – Just what is it?

 

 

The “Open Society”

by Mustang

Henri Bergson – 1878

 

The notion of an open society was first conceived by the French philosopher Henri Bergson in 1932.  An Austrian-born British philosopher named Karl Popper developed it further after World War II.  How we should define a closed society, according to Bergson, is one closed to open-mindedness, either in law or religion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Popper defined it as a society that evolves from its tribal instincts (social tradition) to a depersonalized society —one where we dispense with face-to-face transactions and one in

Karl Popper

which the government must be responsive to all our demands and operate based on transparency and flexibility.  This may almost seem like utopia.  The notion of transparency seems reasonable, but should citizens demand that every government action be revealed to the general public?  Politicians like to talk about transparency, but only when it suits members of congress personally.  To me, “Open Society” seems several steps beyond the collectivist (i.e., communist) state.

 

One further note about Popper: he believed that no one could suppress the ideas of individuality and humanitarianism once people became aware of them —so that it would be impossible for an open society to return to a closed society.

It sounds nice.

Yet, as with all really nice-sounding ideas about how we can all find ways to get along, Bergson’s and Popper’s notions can be and have been corrupted.  Today, the primary advocate of the Open Society is none other than George Soros, who founded the Open Society Foundation.

George Soros

There are clearly two sides to George Soros: that which he heralds, and that which he indeed supports.  On paper, Soros embraces a vibrant, tolerant society whose government is accountable to the people and open to their participation.

He claims a desire to strengthen the rule of law in such areas as respect for human rights, minorities, diversity of opinion, democratic elections.  He wants a civil society that helps keep government power in check.  Toward these goals, the Open Society Foundation seeks to shape public policy toward assuring greater fairness in political, legal, and economic systems.  He wants to safeguard fundamental rights.  These are George Soros’ stated goals.

What George Soros actually does, however, is something quite different.  Some have claimed that Soros organized and funded as many as 206 organizations.  I’m not able to say that this is true, but he has funded more than a few organizations, either directly or through his Open Society Foundation.  Each of these have published seemingly worthwhile mission statements, but all of these are committed to goals and projects that support the progressive/neo-Marxist agenda.  The Open Society Foundation pretends to address social problems, but there is very little disclosure about the kind of society it hopes to create.  Let’s look at a few of these organizations, and then you can decide for yourself how worthwhile they are:

  • The advancement Project, seeking or organize communities of color.  One may recall that Obama was a community organizer and here we may see for the first time the original link between Obama and Soros.
  • Al Haq is an NGO that focuses on accusing Israel of human rights abuses.
  • Alliance for Justice, an activist agency that recently manufactured lies and uncorroborated accusations against Judge Bret Kavanaugh.
  • America Coming Together coordinates and organizes pro-Democrat voter mobilization efforts.  I suspect that they may have branch offices in every graveyard in America’s bluest states.
  • America’s Voice, an open borders group supporting comprehensive immigration reform, amnesty for illegal aliens, and the establishment of sanctuary cities (and states).
  • American Bridge 21st Century is a Super PAC that conducts “opposition research.”
  • New America, focusing on public policy, national security, technology, asset building, health matters, gender, energy, education, and the US economy.  Google’s[1] Executive Chairman heads this organization’s board of directors: who better to develop technology to spy on the American people?
  • Black Lives Matter, which is an international activist movement that focuses on systemic racism.
  • Media Matters for America, a propaganda arm of the Open Society Foundation.  Its mission is the comprehensively monitor, analyze, and correct conservative misinformation.  Discovering its relationship with CNN, MSNBC, and other far-left media groups would be quite interesting; my guess is that this is where FAKE NEWS comes from.
  • Center for Public Integrity, an investigative journalism organization intended to reveal abuses of power, corruption, and dereliction of duty by powerful public and private institutions.  Since we have not seen an exposé of the overwhelming corruption of Maxine Waters, we should probably assume that these journalists only investigate members of the GOP.

The primary benefactor to each of these Soros organized or funded efforts is none other than the party of Andrew Jackson—the one political entity in the United States that embraces Marxism in all its forms and has since the presidency of Woodrow Wilson: The Democratic National Party.

Whenever Soros claims to support fundamental human rights, he’s speaking about open borders —which no conservative in his right mind can support while remaining an American traditionalist.  Soros also claims to support the idea that all societies should be free to participate fully in civic, economic, and cultural life —unless one happens to belong to the other party, in which case the so-called Anti-FA thugs (black or brown shirts) show up to intimidate you into sitting down and shutting up.

Soros claims as a goal to hold those in power accountable for their actions —unless they are dyed-in-the-wool Democratic fascists who seek to increase the size of government and its control over the people, through legislation, taxation, and anti-American amendments to the United States Constitution (and its Amendments).

Hence, Soros’ statement that his Open Society Foundation seeks to respond quickly and flexibly to the most critical threats to an Open Society.  This may explain why people appeared at Tucker Carlson’s house after dark and tried to batter down his front door, terrorizing his wife.

My conclusion is that George Soros’ Open Society Foundation is fake.  Bergson and Popper may have created these ideas under the noblest of motivations, which I believe are unnecessary in American society, but it has been hijacked by communists for their own purposes.  One cannot help but notice how the missions and values of the Soros organizations are constructed in such a way as to form the greatest appeal to the young and under-educated: identity politics is now the primary mantra of the Democratic Party and this is no mere coincidence.

Washington Post reporter attends top secret Soros meeting to advance agenda

 

Thanks to everyone for the Thanksgiving well wishes..back from a lovely holiday with friends and family. Let us not rest, but keep the torch of liberty aflame. Snuff out the liberal media’s lies and deceit. How about this one for a start? :

Allegedly unbiased Washington Post reporter Janell Ross spoke at a top-secret meeting of liberal movers and shakers last week, where Democratic donors including billionaire George Soros outlined the future of their progressive agenda.

A Post spokesperson told the Washington Free Beacon that Ross took part of the California event “without notifying her superiors that she would be attending.”

The Democracy Alliance, which hosted the event, bills itself as “the largest network of donors dedicated to building the progressive movement in the United States” on the group’s official website. The liberal group also claims to “play a leading role in fostering the infrastructure necessary to advance a progressive agenda” in the United States.

The group intended to keep “the identities of its members and guests confidential,” according to the Beacon, but the paper obtained a “detailed conference agenda that lists both events and featured guests.” Once the Beacon revealed the attendees, the group reportedly beefed up security and asked participants to keep details off social media.

Keep reading…

John McCain and George Soros – happy together, won’t say where $6 Mil came from

Okay McCain. Time to come clean. What are you and George Soros doing? And where are all those bucks coming from? He refuses to disclose the donor list. The Daily Caller first reported this back in June. With his apparent sinking of the overturn of Obamacare, it’s worth another look. Here goes:

The question we all want to know, is where did it come from? John McCain keeps hiding and refuses to answer that question!

What we do know, thanks to an investigation by The Daily Caller, is that the McCain Institute for International Leadership received a VERY GENEROUS donation from none other than George Soros.

The institute is intended to serve as a “legacy” for McCain. It “is dedicated to advancing human rights, dignity, democracy and freedom”. It is also a tax-exempt non-profit foundation with assets valued at $8.1 million and associated with Arizona State University.

John McCain turned over nearly $9 million in unspent funds from his failed 2008 presidential campaign to a new foundation bearing his name, the McCain Institute for International Leadership.

The DC gives us more:

Critics worry that the institute’s donors and McCain’s personal leadership in the organization’s exclusive “Sedona Forum” bear an uncanny resemblance to the glitzy Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) that annually co-mingled special interests and powerful political players in alleged pay-to-play schemes.

The institute has accepted contributions of as much as $100,000 from billionaire liberal activist-funder George Soros and from Teneo, a for-profit company co-founded by Doug Band, former President Bill Clinton’s “bag man.”

Teneo has long helped enrich Clinton through lucrative speaking and business deals. (Earlier I had posted Huma Abedin, Bill Clinton’s Butt boy Band’s new Emails will take the Clintons down? In the post, it gave a close look at the relationship of Doug Band and Bill Clinton and the Company Teneo.)

And Bloomberg reported in 2016 on a $1 million Saudi Arabian donation to the institute, a contribution the McCain group has refused to explain publicly.

In addition, the institute has taken at least $100,000 from a Moroccan state-run company tied to repeated charges of worker abuse and exploitation. The McCain group has also accepted at least $100,000 from the Pivotal Foundation. It was created by Francis Najafi who owns the Pivotal Group, a private equity and real estate firm.

What exactly is John McCain doing behind closed doors? What is he doing for Soros to get all that financial love?

Read more

Donald Trump takes on Obama and the Globalist in a parody!

Time to lighten up. Here is a parody that will tickle the funny bone.

Donald Trump continues his victorious path through the US presidential election 2016. After forcefully succeeding president Obama he faces the globalists and their puppets. But with only 300 Spartan warriors, can he beat George Soros himself? Will he Make America Great Again?

 

 

George Soros tells us how to rebuild the Asylum System

If we had any doubt as to who was behind the plan to swamp the Western world with third world “refugees”, you can doubt no more. This from the “horses mouth” Soros himself. I caught the take on it from George Soros and the Muslim invasion of Europe a post from American Thinker… then I went to Soros himself.

Soros has plans — BIG plans — for Europe to “put an end to the panic and the unnecessary human suffering.” For Muslims. Europeans will suffer plenty.

…a European plan must be accompanied by a global response, under the authority of the United Nations and involving its member states.

NEW YORK – The European Union needs to accept responsibility for the lack of a common asylum policy, which has transformed this year’s growing influx of refugees from a manageable problem into yet another political crisis. Each member state has selfishly focused on its own interests, often acting against the interests of others. This precipitated panic among asylum seekers, the general public, and the authorities responsible for law and order. Asylum seekers have been the main victims.

Here are the six components of a comprehensive plan.

First, the EU has to accept at least a million asylum-seekers annually for the foreseeable future. And, to do that, it must share the burden fairly – a principle that a qualified majority finally established at last Wednesday’s summit.

Adequate financing is critical. The EU should provide €15,000 ($16,800) per asylum-seeker for each of the first two years to help cover housing, health care, and education costs – and to make accepting refugees more appealing to member states.

Second, the EU must lead the global effort to provide adequate funding to Lebanon, Jordan, and Turkey to support the four million refugees currently living in those countries.

Third, the EU must immediately start building a single EU Asylum and Migration Agency and eventually a single EU Border Guard. The current patchwork of 28 separate asylum systems does not work: it is expensive, inefficient, and produces wildly inconsistent results in determining who qualifies for asylum.

Fourth, safe channels must be established for asylum-seekers, starting with getting them from Greece and Italy to their destination countries. This is very urgent in order to calm the panic. The next logical step is to extend safe avenues to the frontline region, thereby reducing the number of migrants who make the dangerous Mediterranean crossing.

The operational and financial arrangements developed by the EU should be used to establish global standards for the treatment of asylum-seekers and migrants. This is the fifth piece of the comprehensive plan.

Finally, to absorb and integrate more than a million asylum seekers and migrants a year, the EU needs to mobilize the private sector – NGOs, church groups, and businesses – to act as sponsors. This will require not only sufficient funding, but also the human and IT capacity to match migrants and sponsors.

Read more at Project-Syndicate

Hillary Clinton: ‘I would model the kind of ‘behavior’ I’d hope all Americans would have’

Yes, this about sums up Hillary. So she is going to give up her E-Mail server. Going to get interesting don’t you think?

Clinton: As president, I would ‘model the kind of behavior’ I’d hope all Americans would have

Recall her first encounter with being a lying weasel?

From the post:May 18, 2013 — bunkerville (Is that George Soros in the beginning of the clip?)

Hillary Clinton: Watergate, Our first taste of her delicious corruption

%d bloggers like this: