Dominatrix Fiona Hill long time member of Soros Open Society


 

Fiona Hill, a former top Russia analyst for the White House, said during her testimony on Thursday that conspiracy theories linked to billionaire philanthropist George Soros were anti-Semitic, likening them to “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.”

 

The comments came after Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.) questioned her about conspiracy theories about Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a fellow impeachment inquiry witness who is of Ukrainian Jewish descent. The conspiracy theories have been promoted by Infowars’s Alex Jones and longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone, who was convicted by a federal court last week.

 

Media Matters (Soros) called Roger Stone’s outing of Fiona Hill as a Soros (OSI) operative a “SMEAR” (Stone was right)

https://www.mediamatters.org/roger-stone/former-nsc-staffer-fiona-hill-testified-about-receiving-death-threats-after-being

Here’s proof Roger Stone was right–that Fiona Hill has been inside Soros’s Open Society Institute (OSI) (NY) since before Nov. 04, 2000 directorship filing for the INSTITUTE FOR WAR & PEACE, Co. No. 2744185.

Remarkably, she was hired to advise OSI while she was still completing her PhD at Harvard in History. Her PhD thesis chair was Richard Pipes, a notoriously biased Russian history professor who was a speaker at two Bilderberg conferences, was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and was a C.I.A. advisor to Daddy Bush.

Source:

https://patriots4truth.org/2019/11/20/fiona-hills-is-a-soros-operative/

 

Resume from the Brookings Institute link:

According to her resume Fiona Hill worked for the George Soros Open Society Institute from 2000-2006, just 13 years ago.

Institute for War and Peace Reporting

https://www.companiesintheuk.co.uk/form/the-institute-for-war-and-peace-reporting-(iwpr)/NEWINC/1992-09-01/42725661

fiona 1

https://www.companiesintheuk.co.uk/company/the-institute-for-war-and-peace-reporting-(iwpr)/people

fiona hill 2.jpg

https://www.companiesintheuk.co.uk/form/the-institute-for-war-and-peace-reporting-(iwpr)/288a/2001-05-10/6148252

Fiona Hill. (Filed May 10, 2001). NEW DIRECTOR, Appointment of director or secretary, Form 288a, Advisory Board, Open Society Institute, signed Nov. 04, 2000, Institute for War and Peace Reporting (IWPR), Co. No. 2744185. Companies House (UK).

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2001-05-10-Fiona-Hill-NEW-DIRECTOR-Appointment-of-dir-or-sec-Form-288a-Advisory-Board-Open-Society-Institute-signed-Nov-04-2000-Inst-for-War-and-Peace-Reporting-(IWPR)-Companies-House-filed-May-10-2001.pdf

IN HER OWN HANDWRITING SHE CLAIMS HER ASSOCIATION WITH GEORGE SOROS’ OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE

 

 

Looks real for this Bunkervite…

Sources: Hat Tip and more at  Patriots 4 Truth

For the best in conservative news click below:

Whatfinger News

53 Responses to “Dominatrix Fiona Hill long time member of Soros Open Society”

  1. Sunday Respite – When Winter Comes | BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades! Says:

    […] Dominatrix Fiona Hill long time member of Soros Open Society […]

    Like

  2. markone1blog Says:

    I missed the discussion on Greta. Where did anyone debate Greta with George?

    Like

  3. markone1blog Says:

    George starts with an ad hominem attack and ends with one, but presumes to tell us which sources to use. Pray tell, when will the New York Times print an article on the connection between Soros and Ms. Hill? (Answer: Probably a month after the next Democrat presidential candidate successfully games the American people, so as to save face. Still, it will be on the back page or only electronically published.)

    Liked by 1 person

  4. markone1blog Says:

    Bunkerville, thank you for this deep dive (especially the 2018 link to George Soros and the Open Society).

    George — neither your reputation nor the reputation of anyone who posts here stands central to the argument placed here. If a weakness exists in the argument, attack that. Otherwise, build a convincing alternate case.

    Liked by 1 person

    • george227 Says:

      I do not intend to irritate you nor anger or inflame any of you good folk. I just want you to know there is a reality out of this group,this bubble of right-wing fora. Other ideas, concepts, and opinions have evidence behind them, and if you do not explore them, you will be stuck in a rut diverging from society. Notice I am here and not in some liberal forum. I come to hear what I may be missing in other outlets, explained by those with other political tendencies. I do not have Absolute Truth, I am looking for threads of it.

      The Soros stuff is as believable to me as Xenu and his DC-8s in space flying the millions of Thetans to the volcanoes. I’m sorry, but that is how it looks to me.

      Please start getting information from sources not tainted by politics. When we discuss Greta, because none of you had significant education in AGW, you had to attack her personally, to pick on a little girl and try to sound superior doing it. I understand your feelings, but that is the view of the rest of us.

      Good luck to you folk and thank you for the discussion.

      Like

      • bunkerville Says:

        I spent an extraordinary time researching this. Because Alex Jones or others lay claim to the same info does not make it incorrect. If you are suggesting that the Brookings institute is false then there is nothing to discuss. Research Soros as well. We don’t base our positions on feelings… as what happened at the recent hearings, but facts..

        Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      Thanks Mark one….. Mustang did a great review of Soros

      Like

  5. Mustang Says:

    I think the first time I ever heard about George Soros was back in 2004. It was during the re-election bid of George Bush, the younger. I asked my friend AOW about him and she urged me to undertake a research project on George Soros, which I did.

    We didn’t hear anything from Soros in 2000, which tells me that he was no fan of Al Gore —but he had a peculiar affinity for John and Tereza Hines Kerry, both of whom were (and are) champions of the Sustainability Project. As I recall (although I have no notes on this), he appeared before the National Press Club and announced that his life and death goal would be the defeat of George Bush. Soros made a very bad Mr. Goldfinger, of course, and not even the far left press was much interested in what he had to say. But Soros had money to spare and he used it to buy the Democratic Party.

    Since then, the “Party of Jefferson” has become the party of Soros. I’m not sure how this will unfold in the future, but for now, we know that Soros operatives have wormed their way (as in the style of deep plants of the old Soviet Union we read about in spy novels) into our government, into our military, and we know that he owns the news media and controls the political narrative. We call these “democratic party talking points”. I surely do not know all the details —I’m just one guy, now retired, but with an ability to think for myself. I know how to make logical inferences from facts. I can, as Schiff suggests, add 2+2 and end up with 4.

    The new Democrats (or, if you prefer, Sorocrats), have learned to view America as centers of economic and political power. They haven’t relinquished their penchant for using “un-smart” people to their own advantages, of course, and they’ve pretty much ignored anyone who isn’t able to further their agenda. And I have to say that his agenda is stupid and infantile. Imagine, campaigning for the presidency on a platform that promises the working class that they’ll lose their jobs because shutting down energy is the new face of America. It truly does take one’s breath away to see that someone like this could ever gain reelection. No sense in moaning about history, though, is there?

    But more to the point, it was the Sorocrats who got Trump elected because most Americans reject the globalist agenda. What matters to them is their jobs, being able to take care of their families, and a repudiation of paying ever-increasing taxes to pay for clean air in France. And I’m guessing that these “middle” Americans deeply resent what the Sorocrats are doing to their president in the House of Representatives. We’ll see how this turns out in 2020. I’m hoping that DJT was self-destruct, because I think that this, too, is part of the Soros agenda.

    I think Soros’ greatest achievement has been in his ability to transform former Democrats, people who were capable of reason, into Sorocratic bots incapable of any original thought processes at all. Soros failed utterly in the United Kingdom; he has been much more successful here. As to Dr. Hill, imagine someone with a PhD who is completely unable to think for herself, by which I mean to say that her ideology clouds her ability to think beyond what she already knows. It makes one wonder about the true value of advanced degrees. If they don’t make you smarter or wiser, then where is the return on the investment?

    I hope your post today goes viral, Bunks. Yours is a message that must be heard. Soros is a clear and present danger to the American Republic.

    Liked by 3 people

    • george227 Says:

      This guy has talked himself into a fantasy.

      Like

    • george227 Says:

      ” It makes one wonder about the true value of advanced degrees. If they don’t make you smarter or wiser, then where is the return on the investment?”

      Why don’t you try to earn one and find out? Meanwhile, I am still trying to debate the issue of AGW with you folk but nobody can debate the science here, only politics.

      Like

      • peter3nj Says:

        We know truly ignorance is bliss as evidenced by the serial voters from California to New York keeping the corrupt anti-America Constitution twisters in power almost in perpetuity. Say hello to George.

        Liked by 1 person

      • george227 Says:

        Peter, bribery is specifically outlawed for the president in the Constitution itself.
        Extortion is bribery at the point of a gun, . . or Javelin missile.

        Like

      • bunkerville Says:

        George… go to the Brookings Institute link to her resume and then get back to me.

        Liked by 1 person

      • george227 Says:

        Bunky, (may I?), thanks for the discussion. The debate is not about whether she worked at or with Brookings, it is that there is some kind of plot which included Soros, but which is all in the bubble of conservative fora.

        Like

      • Mustang Says:

        In order for a charge of bribery to be proved, all of the following elements must exist:

        The individual being bribed must be a public official.
        A thing of value has been offered (tangible or intangible)
        An official act has been influenced by a bribe.
        A public official has the authority to commit the official act.
        The public official intended to receive a bribe.
        There is a causal relationship between the payment and the act.

        Now, if the Schiff cabal is claiming that Trump bribed the Ukrainians, the element is not satisfied because the Ukrainians are not US public officials. A thing of value does not exist because all the president wants is for the Ukrainians to do the right thing vis-a-vis corruption. No official act has been influenced by a bribe because Congress already approved foreign aid to Ukraine; all Tump did is delay the aide while considering, as it is his right to do, whether Ukraine deserves to benefit from the American taxpayer. Since there was no causal relationship between Ukrainian investigations into corruption and Congresses intent to deliver foreign aid, the test remains unmet. Hence, there is no bribery, high crimes, or misdemeanors.

        It’s Miller Time.

        Liked by 4 people

      • george227 Says:

        Look up 52 USC 30121 where it specifically prohibits the solicitation of any favor from foreign governments of persons.

        Having served on a Federal Criminal Grand Jury for 70 sessions in 24 months, I learned some of the law.

        Like

      • bunkerville Says:

        George… I realize after the fact that Mustang wrote a post that I think you would find interesting and why we are concerned. I still have hope for you..

        The “Open Society” and George Soros – Just what is it?
        https://bunkerville.wordpress.com/2018/11/14/the-open-society-and-george-soros-just-what-is-it/

        Liked by 3 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      I hesitated and went back and forth for hours on this post… double checking and triple checking,,.. after all Bunker has to keep her reputation!! Seriously, her resume linked directly to the Brookings institute as you can see above… so if they lay claim to her Soros connection it is good enough for me….
      Thanks for your thoughtful comment..always appreciated.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Always On Watch Says:

      Mustang,
      I’m guessing that these “middle” Americans deeply resent what the Sorocrats are doing to their president in the House of Representatives.

      I know for a fact that your statement is true!

      Liked by 2 people

  6. Linda Says:

    We are discussing this here this morning over our morning coffee. The USA is infested bad with these haters. Geesh George get real, smeared? You can’t smear someone when the truth is spoken, get a grip with reality, dude.

    p.s. I got your back, Bunk, always.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. Ed Bonderenka Says:

    Posted to “The League of Deplorable Gentlemen” on Facebook.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Adrienne Says:

    Is it just me or does Ms Hill look like a tranny? Yeah – I know it’s OT, low brow, and snarky, but it’s all I’ve got since I didn’t pay one bit of attention to anything she said today.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. geeez2014 Says:

    BUnkerville! Brother, did that catch MY attention, too. I only saw the first and last hours of the hearings but I found Dr Hill very measured and believable the first hour, then when I saw the second hour and that measured, calm woman seemed to FLIP OUT over Soros and how anybody mentioning him is ANTISEMITIC and following the ELDERS OF ZION I could not believe it! Since when has any of us criticized Soros for all the things we know about him and mentioned his JEWISHNESS? who CARES he’s Jewish or anything else? Hill was HIGHLY sensitive to this and it really caught my attention, too. Actually, I was literally seconds from posting on it when I saw your blog email and looked and you’d done it already…Great job!

    Liked by 3 people

  10. george227 Says:

    This woman is being smeared because she really took it to the politicians.

    Aren’t folk tired of trying to defend the defenseless Trump?

    Like

    • geeez2014 Says:

      Smeared? By Bunkerville? Truth isn’t smearing.

      Like

    • Linda Says:

      dude, get a reality check.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Mustang Says:

      “Smear” is an emotional word which denotes an application of misleading information designed to control a particular narrative. Facts, on the other hand, lead thoughtful people to form reasoned conclusions. The charge reveals much about George227, and his agenda. In making the statement, this commenter reveals himself as a poster-boy for the Soro-cratic party, which in turn makes him a very piss-poor American.

      Liked by 1 person

      • george227 Says:

        I am AF19839588, a real veteran with a real serial number. I enlisted in 1965, and volunteered for the war, going over in 1967. Seeing what we were doing to the Vietnamese and our own people turned me against it in May of 1968, and I was loud about it. I went into the hospital twice and everything I had was repeatedly vandalized by cowards too scared to show themselves.

        You will not question my patriotism or service or validity of my views. I had to guts to stand up for my views.
        I still do.

        Thank you.

        Like

      • Mustang Says:

        You will not question my patriotism or service or validity of my views.

        As a matter of fact, yes I will —in the same way I question the patriotism and service, and the validity of the views of Benedict Arnold and John Kerry. I served in RVN, on the ground, twice. This war, created by the Democrat Lyndon Johnson, was a disaster for American foreign policy and the prestige of our nation, and in the same way Johnson’s Great Society was a disaster for America’s Homefront with consequences far into the future. Nevertheless, I did my duty and have never felt the need to brag about it. You, on the other hand, appear to me as a weasel and it is impossible for me to respect such a low critter as yourself. If you were a true patriot, you’d never support the likes of Hillary Clinton, the efforts of Soros, or any witless, self-serving politician to destroy the American Republic. When America needs true patriots, you are found lacking. Shame on you.

        Liked by 2 people

      • george227 Says:

        Please separate your political prejudice from discussions of patriotism. I will not question your patriotism, and you would be a fool to question mine.

        The Vietnam War began in 1956, after John Foster Dulles reneged on our 1954 promise of free elections in all of Vietnam. We were there killing people in their own country to put our choice of crook in the presidential palace. I got sick of being part of the Killing Machine against people who had done nothing to us.

        Coming from the Air Force Flight Test Center at Edwards AFB, I was used to working with professionals, rational people making good decisions, ultimate professionals at Test Pilot School, NASA, and Special Projects. We lost more folk in that year at Eddie’s than we did my year in Korat with the 388th Tac Fighter Wing. Just professional folk doing their jobs.

        At Korat, we were unarmed airborne electronic intelligence. What you call REMFs. We lost 22 of us unarmed REMFs. Look us up,the 553rd Reconnaissance Wing.

        Like

      • Ed Bonderenka Says:

        I second Mustang. Scoundrels who hide behind their uniform or VA card are still scoundrels.
        The same is true for idiots of like circumstance.
        I don’t need my DD214 to prove my patriotism or allegiance.
        It proves neither.

        Liked by 3 people


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: