DEATH PANEL? DASCHLE ENCOURAGES ‘OTHER OPTIONS’ FOR ELDERLY PATIENTS NEEDING SURGERY

Apparently the elderly should just end it sooner rather than later for the “common good”. They have no shame. Who decides this? Check out our story over in Great Britain. Here is the answer to the trick question: Most expenses often happen at the end of life period. But the tricky part is, you don’t know if it is the end, until after the fact. So goes Cancer treatment. If you recover, it was “not a waste” if not, it was an unnecessary expense in the rationing board’s mind.The elderly get the plug pulled, no questions asked. Coma Grandmother left untreated by Doctors who thought she was beyond help makes full recovery.

Former Senator Tom Daschle wants to “encourage” elderly patients in need of surgeries to seek “other options.”

During a recent radio interview, the former Senate Democrat admitted that if an elderly patient might need a heart transplant, that patient should be encouraged to seek options such as oral medication or “hospice.” For those unfamiliar with hospice, and as the radio host rightly points out, “hospice is where you go to die.”* Former Sen. Tom Daschle says an 85 year old who needs a bypass needs other options including oral medications or a hospice. It should be noted that Mr. Daschle was President Obama’s first choice to be Secretary of Heath and Human Services.

The hospice exchange starts at 2:23:

H/T Breitbart TV

FCC Commissioner Wants to Test the ‘Public Value’ of Every Broadcast Station

Here it comes…. we knew it was coming…. another Marxist dump on a Friday. It speaks for itself and a real heart thumper. I wonder how NPR will meet the criteria. Juan Williams sure didn’t fair so well. The FCC is schduled to meet December 21. Mark it on your calendars. The shortest day, the longest night. Perfect Holiday gift. Some great clips over at

Hot Air:

Here’s your FCC at work, ensuring that freedom of speech and property rights are defended on America’s airwaves. Just kidding! The Blaze and Naked Emperor News has two clips of FCC commissioners demanding unprecedented authority over prior restraint of speech and seizure of private property in order to satisfy their ideas of — you guessed it — “diversity

This is an abbreviated portion found over at CNS:

American journalism is in “grave peril,” FCC Commissioner Michael Copps says, and to bolster “traditional media,” he said the Federal Communications Commission should conduct a “public value test” of every commercial broadcast station at relicensing time.

In a speech at the Columbia University School of Journalism in New York on Thursday, Copps also said station relicensing should happen every four years instead of the current eight.

“If a station passes the Public Value Test, it of course keeps the license it has earned to use the people’s airwaves,” Copps said. “If not, it goes on probation for a year, renewable for an additional year if it demonstrates measurable progress. If the station fails again, give the license to someone who will use it to serve the public interest.”

Ever since Barack Obama became president, prominent conservatives have warned about liberal efforts to squelch conservative and Christian talk-radio.

Although Copps has said the FCC will not reinstate the Fairness Doctrine, his prescription for “testing” commercial broadcast stations (see below) will alarm defenders of free speech and free enterprise.

According to Copps, the FCC’s Public Value Test would include seven areas — and most of the following text is taken verbatim from his speech:

Meaningful Commitments to News and Public Affairs Programming.  Copps said stations meeting certain benchmarks of progress would qualify for “expedited handling of their license renewals.” He said he hopes the FCC will “put the brakes” on cross-ownership of newspapers and broadcast stations.

Enhanced Disclosure. Requiring information about what programs a station airs allows viewers to judge whether their local station should be subsidized with free spectrum privileges, Copps said. It opens a window on a station’s performance. 

Political Advertising Disclosure. …  But we the people have a right to know who is bank-rolling these ads beyond some wholly uninformative and vapidly-named group that appears on the bottom of the screen to mask the special interests it really represents.   I propose that the FCC quickly determine the extent of its current authority to compel release of what interests are paying for this flood of anonymous political advertising — and if we lack the tools we need to compel disclosure, let’s go ask for them.

Reflecting Diversity.  Copps noted that people of color own only about 3.6% of full-power commercial television stations. But he also said diversity encompasses how groups are depicted in the media — too often stereotyped and caricatured, he said — and what roles minorities and women have in owning and managing media companies.  The FCC’s Diversity Advisory Committee has spent years providing us with specific, targeted recommendations to correct this injustice., Copps said. “How sad it is that most of these recommendations have not been put to a Commission vote. It is time to right this awful wrong.”

Community Discovery.    Diversity of programming suffers, minorities are ignored, and local self-expression becomes the exception.  Here’s some good news: Community Discovery would not be difficult to do in this Internet age, when technology can so easily facilitate dialogue.

Local and Independent Programming.  According to Copps, the goal is more localism in our program diet, more local news and information, and a lot less streamed-in homogenization and monotonous nationalized music at the expense of local and regional talent.  Homogenized music and entertainment from huge conglomerates constrains creativity, suppresses local talent, and detracts from the great tapestry of our nation’s cultural diversity.  We should be working toward a solution wherein a certain percentage of prime-time programming—I have suggested 25 percent—is locally or independently-produced.  Public Service Announcements should also be more localized and more of them aired in prime-time, too.  And PEG channels—public, educational and government programming—deserve first-class treatment if we are to have a first class media.

Public Safety.   Stations, like government, have a solemn duty to protect the safety of the people.  “These few criteria for a Public Value Test are neither excessive nor onerous,’ Copps said in his speech.

“But they would get us back to the original licensing bargain between broadcasters and the people: in return for free use of airwaves that belong exclusively to the people, licensees agree to serve the public interest as good stewards of a precious national resource As the old question goes:  If not now, when?  If not us, who?”

Copps said the FCC and Congress in the future will need to examine the rules governing the structure of media ownership. And he advocated increasing support for public broadcasting, which he described as “the jewel of our media landscape.” More at CNS News

.

Bolivia drops retirement age to 58

I tried to figure out it how this all works out. Thirteen years ago Bolivia privatized the pension funds after the state-run system collapsed. Hmm.. now moving toward a 58 year retirement.  Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid was the closest I had come to knowing much about Bolivia. I took a fast look at Bolivia’s history at  Info Please and looks like another bungled foreign policy on our part.  We keep propping up these folks who will not help out the poorest of the poor,even though the country enjoys large natural wealth, just doesn’t cut it Uncle Sam in today’s world where everyone knows how the other half lives. I know its our technology but..

Bucking a global trend, leftist-led Bolivia is lowering its retirement age.
Bolivia’s Congress has given final approval to a law that makes Bolivians eligible for full pensions at age 58.
President Evo Morales has pushed for the law, which also nationalizes the landlocked Andean nation’s pension system and extends pension protection to the 60 percent of Bolivians who work in informal sector.
The previous retirement age was 65 for men and 60 for women.
Bolivia’s Federation of Private Employers opposed the law, which the Senate passed early Friday. It expresses skepticism the new system will be sustainable.
Thirteen years ago, Bolivia privatized its pension funds after a state-run system collapsed.

Read more at the : Washington Examier