Hillary Clinton and her changing views on Syria’s Assad


Seeing Hillary opine on the Iran deal today took me over the top. Now that she has lowered her voice an octave. I wandered into my time machine. Why not do a post on her handling of Syria, as the hordes spring forth out of Syria into Europe and soon the USA. And we should trust her on Iran? Oh, and let’s take a look at Kerry as well.

Watch as Clinton’s keen insight morphs from Assad being a good guy to well, you know, she wishes to dispense with him as she took care of business in Libya and Egypt. But let me throw in a few more characters in this bizarre play that must have the world in absolute astonishment.

Hillary Clinton and her various changing views on Assad.

At this point, Madame Secretary believes that Bashar al- Assad is the good guy. That was in 2011.

Reporters aren’t interested in exploring aspects of Clinton’s job as Secretary of State. One such comment not getting attention is her 2011 labeling of Bashar  al-Assad, the man almost  certainly (maybe) behind a devastating chemical weapons attack, as a “reformer.”

On the March 27, 2011, Clinton insisted, “There’s a different leader in  Syria now. Many of the members of Congress of both parties who have gone to  Syria in recent months have said they believe he’s a reformer.” (The Washington  Post gave this remark three Pinocchios. Clinton later backtracked.)  Yet, ABC, NBC and CBS have not reexamined the comments in the wake of the attack  or its accuracy.

Uploaded on Mar 31, 2011. Included in the clip is her take on the wonders of the administration’s actions in Libya as well. Libya is now a failed State thanks to Hillary. Many many falsehoods about Gadaffi. Spin, spin, spin.

Hillary Labels Syria’s Terrorist-Supporting Dictator A “Reformer”

A SURPRISE at the very ending of the clip.

Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State, has been calling over and over since 2011(That was quick) for the legitimate president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, to leave power and to let a bunch of al-Qaeda supporters known as the Syrian National Council (later Syrian National Coalition) replace him. However, the repeated defeats in battles of her “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) and their al-Qaeda Jihadi assistants have caused her much frustration culminating in a blood clot behind her ear. She was replaced by John Kerry.

Nancy Pelosi

In 2007, Nancy Pelosi, over strong objections from the  State Department, visited Syria, and said, “The road to Damascus is a road to  peace.” Senator John Kerry predicted that “Syria will change as it embraces a  legitimate relationship with the United States.” Read more:  Newsbusters

John Kerry

It wasn’t so long ago that Kerry made repeated pilgrimage to Syria, meeting with Assad five times between 2009 and 2011.

He famously used the adjective “generous” to describe Assad, as the Wall Street Journal’s Bret Stephens recalled in a column:

On March 16, 2011—the day after the first mass demonstration against the regime—John Kerry said Assad was a man of his word who had been “very generous with me.” He added that under Assad “Syria will move; Syria will change as it embraces a legitimate relationship with the United States.” (This is the man who is our secretary of state, and mastermind of the Iran nuclear deal.)

As Michael Rubin recently wrote in Commentary Magazine, Kerry’s staffers described “their collective cringe when, after a motorcycle ride with Bashar al-Assad, he returned to Washington referring to Bashar as ‘my dear friend.’”

The National Review detailed more about Kerry’s positive impression of Assad:

After a “long and comprehensive” meeting with Assad in April of that year, Kerry described it as “a very positive discussion.” A month later, Kerry was back in Syria. His spokesman, insisting that “Syria can play a critical role in bringing peace and stability if it makes the strategic decision to do so,” asserted that Kerry had “emerged as one of the primary American interlocutors with the Syrian government.” Despite the senator’s interlocutions, Assad, it appears, has made the wrong “strategic decision.”

The Washington Free Beacon in an article titled “An Affair to Remember: John Kerry Hearts Bashar al-Assad” called Kerry the Syrian dictator’s “highest-ranking apologist in American politics”

Bonus info:

Kerry and his Iranian in-law relatives. Could he be black mailed?

“I am proud of the Iranian-Americans in my own family, and grateful for how they have enriched my life,” Kerry said in the official statement. Kerry also said he was “strongly committed to resolving” the differences between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran, “to the mutual benefit of both of our people.”

…let us recall this information about Kerry, and his daughter’s husband’s family who happens to live in Iran. How in the world did Kerry even get a security clearance. Maybe again, another desert lover due to his ties.

“But what if the regime simply decides to round up Nahed’s family members and torture them? Or sends its goons to visit them at home? Or exerts some form of more subtle pressure on them that gets no publicity, and then makes it known they want the United States to release Iranians jailed in the United States on terrorism charges or for attempting to procure weapons technology or military spare parts”?

16 Responses to “Hillary Clinton and her changing views on Syria’s Assad”

  1. My Article Read (9-10-2015) | My Daily Musing Says:

    […] Hillary Clinton and her changing views on Syria’s Assad […]

    Like

  2. mcnorman Says:

    HRC is not her spouse. He was coated with teflon, not her. She is done. You know that there are contingency plans in the works.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      In some ways, we may regret pushing her out the door too soon! She may be an easier beat than Biden.

      Like

  3. Mustang Says:

    My take on Assad is that he’s an Arab. Only an Arab could understand Middle Eastern politics with any clarity. My view is that Assad is a 20 watts bulb, is a useful idiot to Iran and Russia, hated by Sunnis everywhere, and not quite as bad as John McCain thinks.

    One scenario I’ve been thinking about is: Saddam transfers his WMD to Syria, headed by a Baathist brother. Sunni rebels seize these weapons, and use them against other Sunni rebels, then claim that Assad did it. Assad responds as would any Arab: “I taut I taw a puddytat.” John McCain shows up, offers to arm Syrian rebels with US taxpayer funded weapons, and now John McCain is universally loved by everyone who wipes their butt with their left hand. Under these circumstances, it is difficult for me to determine who I hate more: McCain, or Assad. Oh, and those Syrian rebels are ISIS today.

    We can thank Andrew Jackson for the spoils system he saddled us with. This is why we have morons in Washington DC … And the democrats have never seen a moron they didn’t love. After all look who chairs the DNC.

    Liked by 2 people

    • petermc3 Says:

      Speaking of Debbie Wolfman Schultz I saw her on TV today…some scary shit yo. Even Bubba wouldn’t stain her blue dress.

      Liked by 3 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      I agree totally with your analysis. McCain is the biggest fool in the room IMO. Never was a war he didn’t love. Before Hillary and her pals came along we didn’t hear of Christians being slaughtered wholesale in the Middle East.

      Liked by 1 person

      • petermc3 Says:

        Maybe the Islamists mofo’s have it right when it comes to subjugating women. Making babies and gruel; in light of the murder and mayhem engendered by Charliebama’s Angels, makes sense. 👸🏽💂

        Liked by 2 people

  4. Laura Bernard Mielcarek Says:

    They’re all lying liars. The wind blows and they change their stance…vehemently denying they ever espoused a different opinion.

    Liked by 2 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      The internet is what has changed the terrain. We now have proof as bloggers that they are lying weasels. No longer dependent on the MSM.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. silverfiddle Says:

    An accomplished politician can stake out an position on all sides of an issue. I pray this horrible monster never again gets anywhere near the levers of power, let alone the presidency.

    Liked by 3 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      We have much to fear. She alone with her gal pals instigated the so called Arab spring. Gadaffi gave up his nukes. Look what it got him. A feckless foreign policy has brought the Middle East to where it is.

      Liked by 2 people

  6. petermc3 Says:

    Clinto, Pelosi, Kerry, what a crew. As a nation we should be so embarrassed that these destroyers are kept in power for decades. They continue their overt corruption and dissembling of a once great nation with virtually no pushback, no opposition; a perfect storm for the left as they lead us down the road to getting our just desserts.

    Liked by 2 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      Very well said. We are like the Lemmings, marching toward the cliffs.

      Liked by 2 people

  7. Brittius Says:

    Reblogged this on Brittius.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      Thanks again.

      Like

      • Brittius Says:

        You’re welcome.

        Like


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: