Donald Trump ends celebration of Ramadan dinner celebration

Finally Trump puts his foot down. We have been at war with Islam since the beginning of our Nation. Shades of what John Adams and Thomas Jefferson argued back at the time of the beginning of our Nation. Muslims were terrorizing our shipping lanes on what was known as the Barbary Coast. Capturing our sailors and ships. Appeasement? Or War? I include a small part of an earlier post of mine concerning it.

President Trump, who stayed over at the White House for the weekend, did not hold an iftar dinner to commemorate Ramadan. Instead, he issued a statement Saturday morning to celebrate the occasion, which marks the end of the holy month.

 

“On behalf of the American people,” President Trump said in the statement, “Melania and I send our warm greetings to Muslims as they celebrate Eid al-Fitr.”

Over the years, the dinners, attended by leaders of the Muslim community, foreign diplomats and members of Congress, have grown odd, given the nonstop Islamic violence spreading across the world. Ramadan brings even more terror as Muslim attackers are seen as martyrs during Ramadan, and supposedly win greater rewards in the afterlife.

And 2017 set a new record for terror attacks during Ramadan, which ran from May 26 to June 24. There were 174 Islamic terror attacks that left 1,595 people dead and 1,960 wounded, reports Religion of Peace.  H/T”Daily Wire

What Jefferson and Adams knew about Muslims that Progressives don’t

Adams wanted to pay ransom to secure the release of hostages. Jefferson said no more. Appeasement? Or war. It is good to review this piece of History at this time. Here tis a piece of it:

During the meeting Jefferson and Adams asked the Dey’s ambassador why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts.

The Americans wanted to negotiate a peace treaty based on Congress’ vote to appease. For the following 15 years, the American government paid the Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages. The payments in ransom and tribute amounted to 20 percent of United States government annual revenues in 1800.

Not long after Jefferson’s inauguration as president in 1801, he dispatched a group of frigates to defend American interests in the Mediterranean, and informed Congress.

Declaring that America was going to spend “millions for defense but not one cent for tribute,” Jefferson pressed the issue by deploying American Marines and many of America’s best warships to the Muslim Barbary Coast. Read more

 

Scalise: fractured bones, injured internal organs, severe bleeding, condition critical

Prayers for Rep Scalise. Of course, the Alt-Left’s rhetoric has nothing to do with this.

Rep. Scalise is reported by MedStar Washington to have fractured bones, internal organs injured and severe bleeding. Scalise remains in critical condition, all thanks to a left wing extremist who hunted down Republicans.

From America’s Watchotower:

Here are 15 examples of celebrities wishing or threatening violence against Donald Trump, and if the left-wing on Twitter can be used as an example they are only upset it was not worse than it was. But the left are the tolerant ones…

Bernie Saunders?

“Today in the White house we have perhaps the worst and most dangerous President in the history of our country.  Bernie Saunders.

Congressman Steve Scalise sustained a single rifle shot to the left hip. The bullet travelled across his pelvis, fracturing bones, injuring internal organs, and causing severe bleeding. He was transported in shock to MedStar Washington Hospital Center, a Level I Trauma Center. He underwent immediate surgery, and an additional procedure to stop bleeding. He has received multiple units of blood transfusion. His condition is critical, and he will require additional operations. We will provide periodic updates.

Are the free societies of the world doomed to fail?

 

The man MI5 didn’t think was dangerous: Killer used gym to radicalize youngsters, worked out with a terror suspect on the FBI watch list and was reported to the security services again LAST SUMMER. So goes the headline.
Today a guest post by Mustang:

An interesting recent article in the UK’s Daily Mail headlined as “MI-5 and Yard: We had him and let him go: a shocking admission that 2-years before London Bridge jihadi maniac went on rampage.”  What is missing is the logical follow-on subtitle: negligent officials arrested and charged in the deaths of innocents.

To my way of thinking, this is a large part of the problem: free societies never seem able to hold their elected officials and bureaucrats accountable for their gross incompetence.  I am wondering … why not?  Do they, or do they not, work for “the people?”

According to the report, “Khuram Butt, 27, was flagged up because of his extremist views and his case was examined by Scotland Yard and the security services.  A call was later made to the anti-terror hotline, warning of Butt’s increasingly extremist behavior, but officials downgraded the investigation because they did not suspect the married father of two was planning an attack.”

As it turns out, the dismissal was incompetent in the extreme, or if you prefer, criminally wanton due to thoughtless political correctness.  Similar instances have occurred in the United States, a few of which were honor killings of female children by their own father, some of whom have never been brought to justice.

What does it take to switch on the light —to finally move against what to me is an obvious conspiracy by too many extremists who seek to murder us.

We can do better than this, yet we sit back and allow un-named officials to draw their fat salaries and hefty pensions even after making horrendously consequential decisions.  It makes the admonition “see something—say something” laughable.  Perhaps what has happened to us is exactly what we deserve —for our complacency.

What is your point of view?

WikiLeaks: Saudi & Qatar governments funded and gave logistical support to ISIS confirms Hillary Clinton email

John Podesta’s hacked Emails are a gift that keeps on giving. A new release yesterday has garnered no attention. It tells us all we need to know about our new best friend, Saudi Arabia. This leak comes on the heels of  Arab powers sever Qatar ties, citing support for militants | Reuters

Meanwhile we are selling $100 Billion in new military toys to Saudi Arabia. Maybe they see the light or maybe?

Ivanka Trump fund takes $100M from Saudi Arabia, UAE – NY Daily ….

May 21, 2017 – Saudi Arabia donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation, according to the charity’s website — which is, at most, …

I say lets get these so-called donations out of the mix. For an easier read, go to the link in the tweet below:

Money used to kill our men and women in uniform, aid terrorists……

Prime Minister May’s terrorism solution? Restrict the Internet

It would be one thing if control of the internet was focused on radical Islam converting others to mayhem and violence. But if history tells us anything, control of speech ends up as  the first step and the hallmark of moving toward a totalitarian State. So if you have concern that Prime Minister May might be a bad choice in the upcoming British election, check out my earlier post Could the British Labor Party Corbyn Win the British Election?  Here we go with the latest.

British Prime Minister Theresa May called for a bold measure after her nation suffered yet another deadly terror attack in the heart of London.

No, May did not call for reforming the United Kingdom’s immigration policies or shutting down known extremist mosques. She instead called for restricting the internet.

“We need to work with allied democratic governments to reach international agreements to regulate cyberspace to prevent the spread of extremist and terrorism planning,” May stated in her Sunday speech. She also declared that the “pluralistic values of Britain” must be established as “superior” to any other value set.

The UK already has a lengthy record for targeting so-called “Islamophobia” spread on the Internet. Back in 2013, the British government arrested several citizens in the middle of the night over their “racist” comments following a Muslim extremist decapitating British soldier Lee Rigby in broad daylight.

In February 2016, U.K. police arrested a Scottish man who was upset over the large number of refugees who were set to settle in his small town. A month later, authorities detained a London man for his apparently “Islamophobic” tweet in response to the Brussels terror attack.

And this is just the United Kingdom being discussed here. Pretty much every single Western European country is obsessed with silencing “hate speech” online and Germany has gone as far as to threaten to hit Facebook with a massive $53 million fine if the platform doesn’t comply with its demands to censor “offensive” views.

More at  Daily Caller

Free rides for refugees – Displacing Europe’s Population

I am not a fan of Info Wars in particular, but they often provide leads to information one would not find otherwise. Either way, one has to wonder why Europe is so worried about Russia when they are no less allowing the Trojan horse of millions of refugees into their midst which will ultimately doom themselves. There are Millions of Dollars in the business of taking care of refugees, so this is not so far fetched. Check out

   There’s money to made on these Syrian Refugees‏ 

Here we go with the latest from Moon Battery:

Combine the mass importation of “refugees” with Africa’s exploding population rate and you have effective genocide. If this continues, within a century Europeans will face a situation as grim as whites do now in South Africa. Another century after that and no one will even remember Europeans; the continent will be populated by savages squatting in dung huts.

If Russia invaded, Europe would fight back. But to be conquered by Russians would be infinitely better than to be displaced out of existence by uncountable hordes of Africans, because there would still be such a thing as the future.

More at Moonbattery

Judge overturns sentence for notorious serial killer D.C. sniper Lee Boyd Malvo

On Friday a federal judge tossed out two life sentences for one of Virginia’s most notorious criminals, sniper Lee Boyd Malvo and ordered Virginia courts to hold new sentencing hearings. Malvo arrived illegally in Miami in 2001 and, in December of that year, he and his mother were apprehended by the Border Patrol in Bellingham, Washington.[6] (His mother was deported back to Jamaica from the U.S. on December 15, 2002 in the aftermath of the D.C. area sniper shootings.)[7]) In January 2002, Malvo was released on a $1,500 bond.[6]    At the time of his arrest, he was 4 months shy of his 18th birthday. His partner John Allen Muhammad was an illegal as well.

Mustang offers us his view on the matter with a guest post:

Justice Denied

In 2002, Lee Boyd Malvo was convicted of taking part in a terrifying serial sniper murder case.  This saga isn’t over yet because (Clinton appointed) Federal District Judge Raymond Jackson (yep) has thrown out Malvo’s back to back life sentences … on the basis that the sentences were unconstitutional.  The claim: Malvo wasn’t aware when he made a plea bargain (to avoid the death sentence) that teenagers have rights denied to everyone else … well, because they’re teenagers.

Malvo was only 17 when he was arrested for a series of shootings that killed ten people and wounded three more.  Typical of cowards, Malvo and his side-kick shot people while concealed in the trunk of an automobile.  (Aside: the press initially reported that these murders were being carried out by terrorists, but later the press said “No, this wasn’t terrorism.”  If a certain behavior causes terror among people, it’s terrorism … further proof that the American people should completely ignore the lame-stream media).

By the way, Malvo’s lawyers are now arguing that he was but a naïve child at the time of his crimes, merely a pawn of accomplice John Allen Muhammad (yep) and that, as such, Malvo should have a future opportunity for parole.  Jackson’s decision follows two Supreme Court decisions, one that prohibited mandatory life sentences without parole for juveniles, and the other that established a framework within which retroactive reviews of all such sentences might be conducted by state courts.  Judge Anthony Kennedy authored this majority opinion (Oh say it isn’t so!)  Typically a leftist, Kennedy opined, (paraphrasing) that the opportunity for release of convicted dependents [should be] granted to those who can demonstrate they are capable of change.  Kennedy/Jackson seem not at all bothered that ten innocent persons were murdered by this scumbag, and laying cold in the grave, had no opportunity to reach their full potential in life.  Typical of leftist thinking, in my view … 

No doubt Malvo will be released one day; I have little doubt that he will be  welcomed with open arms into the loving care of the Nation of Islam (with whom then Senator Obama’s Trinity Baptist Church formed an ever-so-close alliance). 

Justice in America today depends on skin color; it is precisely this sort of selective law-making by the courts that generates the kind of anger displayed by Dylann Roof in Charleston.  So I have to ask: is this the best our country’s courts can do? 

%d bloggers like this: