What is next? Money laundering for Great Britain’s new best friends?
Lloyds Bank has been accused of religious discrimination after offering free overdraft accounts to Muslims.
The bank sent customers a booklet this month explaining new charges.
While many will have to pay up to £80 a month if they go into the red, Muslims were told they would escape the charges. The document said: “We are removing the monthly overdraft management fee of £6 from our Islamic Account, Islamic Student Account and Islamic Graduate Account. So, if you use an unplanned overdraft on these accounts, there won’t be any charges.”
The Islamic account was set up by the High Street bank to attract Muslim customers by allowing them to keep faithful to their religion.
A Lloyds spokesman said Islamic accounts were intended for customers who cannot receive or pay interest under sharia, but were available to anyone, regardless of their faith. More at
the time is here. Best yet, the mark of the beast or rather, a chip is now implanted on all driver’s license except nine States have been dragging their feet. An RFID chip. And just how much does that chip do? I am getting ahead of myself. Here is what she says:
Now, there is no debate as to whether or not the card will contain a chip that is capable of tracking people, the only debate has been around which tracking technology better suits their needs. Here are a few quotes again from the official government document:
“ DHS also invites comments on how States would or could incorporate a separate WHTI- compliant technology, such as an RFID-enabled vicinity chip technology, in addition to the REAL ID PDF417 barcode requirement.”
“States can leverage the same infrastructure that they will need to purchase for REAL ID to incorporate MRZ, proximity chips, and vicinity chip technology onto a driver’s license.”
“The use of RFID is essential to the WHTI program in order to ensure facilitation at crowded U.S. land and sea crossing points. Similar concerns are not implicated by REAL ID, which is one of the factors that led DHS to select the 2D bar code as the common machine readable technology on driver’s licenses and identification cards. DHS encourages States to explore alternative technologies on their driver’s licenses and identification cards in order to promote security and technology advances as well as e-government initiatives a State may wish to explore.”
“DHS does not believe that non-compliant driver’s licenses or credit cards are acceptable documents to establish identity.” Meaning – no chip, no ID. Doesn’t this remind you of something else?
Can you see where all of this is headed? Many of the people that are attempting to implement this thing may have “good intentions”, but we all know what they say about “good intentions”.
If we put up with a national ID card, then the Obama administration will be emboldened to try to implement the “universal Internet ID” that they have been talking about.
The sad truth is that America is no longer “the land of the free“. The government has decided that in order to keep us “safe”, everything that we do must be watched, tracked, traced, recorded and controlled.
Why it is difficult to respect Europeans by Mustang.
Ah, the Europeans … who, bless their little pea-pick ‘in hearts, seem to solidify into but two classes of human beings. In the first, we find those who tired of the tyranny of so-called noble aristocracy and moved … dare I suggest it? … to America. In America, they became frontiersmen, soldiers, sailors, farmers, entrepreneurs, politicians, judges, engineers, teachers, factory workers, miners, doctors, restaurateurs, steelworkers, cabbies, and dry-goods merchants. They were folks who made substantial contributions to America’s growth —and it is for this reason that we should take great pride in their accomplishments. The European emigre is part of the story of America.
Conversely, in the second group, we discover those who elected to stay behind, to do as they were told —including permitting themselves to be drawn into two horrific world wars, who believed that republican democracy and civic virtue was much too difficult, and that getting free stuff at everyone else’s expense was a pretty neat idea, even at the expense of their own economic and philosophical emancipation —who today have evolved into the kind of human beings that would never in a million years question anything their respective governments tell them. Somehow, in the dynamic of social evolution, they convinced themselves that their lives must surely benefit all of mankind —even if that means standing idly by while foreign swine rape their women and pillage their communities. It truly is amazing.
But, if for today we are only considering the de-evolution of Germany, then we should recognize that this one country has had a robust relationship with Moslem countries since the late 19th Century when the Germans ruled over substantial Islamic populations.
In this relationship, the Germans sought to use Islam as a tool of control, even including the recognition of Sharia courts, Islamic endowments, support of madrasas, and recognition of Islamic holidays and festivals. In these days, German officials ruled their Islamic holdings through Moslem intermediaries, who in this way, gave legitimacy to German occupation. In 1898, during his visit to the tomb of Saladin, Wilhelm II declared Germany as a friend to the world’s (then) 300 million Islamacists.
Subsequently, Germany mobilized Moslems living in British, French, and Russian territories to aid them during World War I. Although Germany failed to spread Jihad in 1914, German strategists nevertheless maintained a strong interest in Islamic geopolitics. It was a strategy revisited by the Germans during World War II—including Eberhard von Stoher’s suggestion that Germany adopt an extensive Islam program. Such a program was in fact created in late 1941, and which enlisted the support and participation of the Mufti of Jerusalem, Amin al-Husayni. Germany regarded the Moslems as a source of authority that would legitimize their involvement in the Third Reich, and even justify Islamic violence toward non-German infidels. To cement this relationship, Germany instructed German soldiers to respect Islamic traditions. Moreover, the Germans made extensive use of religious policies, ordered the construction of mosques, prayer halls, and madrasas. Similar programs were established in the Balkans, and Moslems were continuously reminded that the Bolsheviks were mostly their hated enemy, the Jews. In the Crimea, General Erich von Manstein demanded that Islamists eradicate the Jewish-Bolshevik wherever they may be found. Both the Wehrmacht and SS regarded the Islamists as welcome allies.
In the Balkans in 1943, Manstein continually consulted with Islamic officials. For their part, the Moslems hoped that Germany would assist them in establishing an Islamic state in the region. Having intensified partisan hatred of Germany, the plan to co-opt Moslems backfired; violence escalated, resulting in the death of a quarter of a million Islamists.
The wholesale murder of Europe’s Gypsies involved Muslims directly. According to one first-hand account, “The gypsies arrived en masse on carriages at the Talmud-Thora Building. For some reason, they raised a green flag, the symbol of Islam, and put a mullah at the head of their procession. The gypsies tried to convince the Germans and Moslems that they were not gypsies; some claimed to be Tatars, others to be Turkmens. But their protests were disregarded and they were all exterminated.”
According to Professor David Motadel at the University of Edinburgh, Hitler lamented to Martin Bormann in the final months of the war that Germany’s efforts to fully mobilize the Moslems had failed because the Islamacists were not strong enough … and had the movement succeeded, “just think of what we could have done to help them, even to incite them, as would have been both our duty and our interest.”
History is interesting, is it not? It should lead us now to wonder what is going on within Angela Markel’s inner circles as it relates to massive and uninterrupted Moslem migrations to Germany.
B-Ville has added this video. It was done in 2009. Chilling.
US FUNDS ISLAMIC TERRORISTS – by Mustang (For an update on my Irma Status, see previous post)
Robert Louis Stevenson once told us, “Don’t judge each day by the harvest you reap, but by the seeds that you plant.” It sounds like good advice … and perhaps also, a variation of “You reap what you sow.”
We Americans do not appear to be very efficient at sowing seeds—and I say this because over the past fifty or so years, we are reaping nothing by foolishness; some of this folly very dangerous to the interests of our citizens.
Case in point. We seem to have plenty of time engaging in heated discussions about white supremacists and neo-Nazi anti-fascists (a contradiction in terms if ever I heard one), but no time at all to consider US federal funding earmarked for charity fronted terrorist groups. The group I refer to is Islamic Relief (IR); it is the largest Islamist charity in the western world with dozens of branches across the globe. IR officials have dined at the White House, received awards from the British head of state, and has enjoyed receiving literally millions of dollars from western governments —include our own. The conundrum is this: IR does provide charitable resources in areas where they are most needed, but it is also a major promoter of hatred and violence against anyone who is not an insane Islamacist.
Wondering now, what is so difficult to figure out? Branded as a terrorist front organization by the United Arab Emirates in 2015, because of its ties to the Moslem Brotherhood and Hamas, IR was also condemned by the banking giant HSBC, which closed IR accounts in 2016. Then, a year later, Germany’s federal court initiated an investigation into IR alleging misuse of aid money. Earlier this year, the British joined the bandwagon by opening an investigation to inquire into the circumstances of its association with an extremist American Imam by the name of Yasir Qadhi, who urged Islamacists to kill all homosexuals.
You can read the story here. My question, shouldn’t we all be writing letters to the Attorney General asking him to shut this organization down, or to members of congress demanding that they stop funding terrorists in the United States, or refusing to buy any products from American companies that support the Silicon Valley Community Foundation? Just asking …
Finally Trump puts his foot down. We have been at war with Islam since the beginning of our Nation. Shades of what John Adams and Thomas Jefferson argued back at the time of the beginning of our Nation. Muslims were terrorizing our shipping lanes on what was known as the Barbary Coast. Capturing our sailors and ships. Appeasement? Or War? I include a small part of an earlier post of mine concerning it.
President Trump, who stayed over at the White House for the weekend, did not hold an iftar dinner to commemorate Ramadan. Instead, he issued a statement Saturday morning to celebrate the occasion, which marks the end of the holy month.
“On behalf of the American people,” President Trump said in the statement, “Melania and I send our warm greetings to Muslims as they celebrate Eid al-Fitr.”
Over the years, the dinners, attended by leaders of the Muslim community, foreign diplomats and members of Congress, have grown odd, given the nonstop Islamic violence spreading across the world. Ramadan brings even more terror as Muslim attackers are seen as martyrs during Ramadan, and supposedly win greater rewards in the afterlife.
And 2017 set a new record for terror attacks during Ramadan, which ran from May 26 to June 24. There were 174 Islamic terror attacks that left 1,595 people dead and 1,960 wounded, reports Religion of Peace. H/T”Daily Wire
Adams wanted to pay ransom to secure the release of hostages. Jefferson said no more. Appeasement? Or war. It is good to review this piece of History at this time. Here tis a piece of it:
During the meeting Jefferson and Adams asked the Dey’s ambassador why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts.
The Americans wanted to negotiate a peace treaty based on Congress’ vote to appease. For the following 15 years, the American government paid the Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages. The payments in ransom and tribute amounted to 20 percent of United States government annual revenues in 1800.
Not long after Jefferson’s inauguration as president in 1801, he dispatched a group of frigates to defend American interests in the Mediterranean, and informed Congress.
Declaring that America was going to spend “millions for defense but not one cent for tribute,” Jefferson pressed the issue by deploying American Marines and many of America’s best warships to the Muslim Barbary Coast. Read more
Prayers for Rep Scalise. Of course, the Alt-Left’s rhetoric has nothing to do with this.
Rep. Scalise is reported by MedStar Washington to have fractured bones, internal organs injured and severe bleeding. Scalise remains in critical condition, all thanks to a left wing extremist who hunted down Republicans.
Here are 15 examples of celebrities wishing or threatening violence against Donald Trump, and if the left-wing on Twitter can be used as an example they are only upset it was not worse than it was. But the left are the tolerant ones…
“Today in the White house we have perhaps the worst and most dangerous President in the history of our country. Bernie Saunders.
Congressman Steve Scalise sustained a single rifle shot to the left hip. The bullet travelled across his pelvis, fracturing bones, injuring internal organs, and causing severe bleeding. He was transported in shock to MedStar Washington Hospital Center, a Level I Trauma Center. He underwent immediate surgery, and an additional procedure to stop bleeding. He has received multiple units of blood transfusion. His condition is critical, and he will require additional operations. We will provide periodic updates.
To my way of thinking, this is a large part of the problem: free societies never seem able to hold their elected officials and bureaucrats accountable for their gross incompetence. I am wondering … why not? Do they, or do they not, work for “the people?”
According to the report, “Khuram Butt, 27, was flagged up because of his extremist views and his case was examined by Scotland Yard and the security services. A call was later made to the anti-terror hotline, warning of Butt’s increasingly extremist behavior, but officials downgraded the investigation because they did not suspect the married father of two was planning an attack.”
As it turns out, the dismissal was incompetent in the extreme, or if you prefer, criminally wanton due to thoughtless political correctness. Similar instances have occurred in the United States, a few of which were honor killings of female children by their own father, some of whom have never been brought to justice.
What does it take to switch on the light —to finally move against what to me is an obvious conspiracy by too many extremists who seek to murder us.
We can do better than this, yet we sit back and allow un-named officials to draw their fat salaries and hefty pensions even after making horrendously consequential decisions. It makes the admonition “see something—say something” laughable. Perhaps what has happened to us is exactly what we deserve —for our complacency.
What is your point of view?