Clapper: ‘Thinking Of Something Else’ When he Lied To Congress

 

Keep in mind, Senator Wyden knows that metadata on every single one of us is being kept at the Utah Data Center.

Every itty bitty bit of everything we do say or may even be thinking is kept. Stored in a facility that is large enough to store everyone’s information for one hundred years. Wyden is very upset about it. He knowingly wants to nail Clapper down. Clapper knows he knows.

First we have the short Wyden take down, then the Clapper’s remarks on “The View” where Megan McCain tries to nail him. In case you haven’t seen it,

I will add the chilling clip of the Utah Data Center being built. It is now up and running. He states on The View that he was in “a bad place” to reveal he was spying essentially on every single one of us, since the program was Classified.

 

Ron Wyden’s exchange with Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. 2013

 

Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper claimed Tuesday that he “made a mistake,” but that he didn’t lie when he told Sen. Ron Wyden in 2013 that the National Security Agency doesn’t collect data on Americans.

Clapper was defending himself on “The View” after President Donald Trump called him a “lying machine.”

A report from The Guardian later that year showed that Clapper’s statement was false, that the NSA does collect phone metadata on millions of Americans.

Keep reading…

UPDATE: For an even better explaining, see an old post 2013. Clapper offers his “metaphor” explanation as to why he lied.

The attempt at a takedown starts about 3:48 if you want to move it along:

 

NSA Utah Data Spy Center Revealed

This is what Clapper termed “Classified” and that is “The bad place he was in” ???  We weren’t suppose to know about it!!

Filmed from Redwood Road, you can see the progress of the NSA’s Utah Data Center also called the NSA Spy Center.

Advertisements

Bombshell: Report confirms U.S. coalition struck deal with ISIS, Permanent bases set up

Once again, Americans give blood and treasure and in return our government lies to us, the media fails to report that we are setting up shop in one more country. Syria. We make our bargain with the devil. In this case, giving away the Syrian oil fields. Selling out the Kurds in the process. The swamp is alive and well.

I will give you the concluding paragraph of the post:

So it appears that the US allowed ISIS terrorists to freely leave areas under coalition control, according to no less than the BBC, while at the same time attempting to make the case before the public that a permanent Pentagon presence is needed in case of ISIS’ return. But it’s a familiar pattern by now: yesterday’s proxies become today’s terrorists, which return to being proxies again, all as part of justifying permanent US military presence on another nation’s sovereign territory………

And astoundingly, even foreign fighters who had long vowed to carry out attacks in Europe and elsewhere were part of the deal brokered under the sponsorship of the US coalition in Syria. According to According to the BBC report

 America’s Syrian adventure went from public declarations of “we’re staying out” to “just some logistical aid to rebels” to “okay, some mere light arms to fight the evil dictator” to “well, a few anti-tank missiles wouldn’t hurt” to “we gotta bomb the new super-bad terror group that emerged!” to “ah but no boots on the ground!” to “alright kinetic strikes as a deterrent” to “but special forces aren’t really boots on the ground per se, right?” to yesterday’s Mattis declaration of an open-ended commitment. And on and on it goes.

At a moment of widespread acknowledgement that the short-lived Islamic State is no longer a reality, and as ISIS is about to be defeated by the Syrian Army in its last urban holdout of Abu Kamal City in eastern Syria, the US is signalling an open-ended military presence in Syria. On Monday Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told reporters at the Pentagon that the US is preparing for a long term military commitment in Syria to fight ISIS “as long as they want to fight.”

Mattis indicated that even should ISIS loose all of its territory there would still be a dangerous insurgency that could morph into an “ISIS 2.0” which he said the US would seek to prevent. “The enemy hasn’t declared that they’re done with the area yet, so we’ll keep fighting as long as they want to fight,” Mattis said. “We’re not just going to walk away right now before the Geneva process has traction.”

Snip..

Meanwhile Turkey once again reiterated that the US has 13 bases in Syria, though the US-backed Syrian YPG has previously indicated seven US military bases in northern Syria. The Pentagon, however, would not confirm base locations or numbers – though only a year-and-a-half ago the American public was being assured that there would be “no boots on the ground” due to mission creep in Syria.

During the last year of the Obama administration, State Department spokesman John Kirby was called out multiple times by reporters for tell obvious and blatant lies concerning “boots on the ground” in Syria.

Remember this? “We are not going to be involved in a large scale combat mission on the ground in Syria. That is what the president [Obama] has long said.”
“It all depends what your definition of ‘boot’ is” John Kirby, State Department Spokesperson. U.S. Department of State – Daily Briefing: Apr.25.2016

According to yesterday’s bombshell BBC report:

 The BBC has uncovered details of a secret deal that let hundreds of Islamic State fighters and their families escape from Raqqa, under the gaze of the US and British-led coalition and Kurdish-led forces who control the city. A convoy included some of IS’s most notorious members and – despite reassurances – dozens of foreign fighters. Some of those have spread out across Syria, even making it as far as Turkey.

IMPORTANT NOTE: Omar fields falling into hands of SDF could well have been part of a Quid pro quo deal that allowed ISIS to leave Raqqa for allowing SDF to capture Omar oil field after ISIS attacks  positions. If you read 1 article today, make sure its one by BBC below https://twitter.com/ehsani22/status/930134159607070721 

Full story over at Zero Hedge

Watch Sen. Chuck Schumer Shower Praise on Diversity Visa Lottery in 2006

Put this down as “just for the record.” He thinks it’s wonderful watching the lottery winners as he goes riding along on his bike. How ironic. Really worked out swell Chuckie. Meanwhile the power ball winner in this little lottery of his and swimmer Ted Kennedy was the terrorist.

In case you missed yesterday’s info:

National Review:

The Diversity Visa (DV) program, to take just one glaring example of government insanity, is still going.

On October 1, the State Department opened the annual DV random lottery to applicants from around the world. Yes, it’s completely random, like a Powerball drawing.

Up to 55,000 lucky winners will snag permanent residency visas (green cards), which put them on the path to American citizenship ahead of millions of other foreigners patiently waiting to come to this country.

The Diversity Visa lottery program is a public-health hazard and a national-security risk that leaves our safety to random chance. But pleas to curtail or end the program since the 9/11 attacks have fallen on deaf ears.

But if you come from a terror-sponsoring or terror-friendly nation — such as Iran, Syria, Sudan, North Korea, or more than a dozen officially designated terror enablers on the State Department’s list — no worries. Thousands from these breeding grounds for jihad will walk through our front doors.

You know who else will get in? Untold numbers of “diversity” petitioners from Liberia, Sierra Leone, and other West African countries where the Ebola virus is epidemic. If you think the feds will ensure that foreign visa-seekers with communicable diseases stay out, think again. The State Department now allows applicants with HIV to apply and enter. Those who suffer from tuberculosis, leprosy, or other afflictions “of public health significance” can apply for waivers. Unfortunately, there is no antidote for our government’s blind and deadly diversity worship. Political correctness is a plague on us all.

Keep reading…

Lloyds Bank drops overdraft fee on Islamic accounts, charges non-Muslims

 

What is next? Money laundering for Great Britain’s new best friends?

Lloyds Bank has been accused of religious discrimination after offering free overdraft accounts to Muslims.

The bank sent customers a booklet this month explaining new charges.

 

While many will have to pay up to £80 a month if they go into the red, Muslims were told they would escape the charges. The document said: “We are removing the monthly overdraft management fee of £6 from our Islamic Account, Islamic Student Account and Islamic Graduate Account. So, if you use an unplanned overdraft on these accounts, there won’t be any charges.”

The Islamic account was set up by the High Street bank to attract Muslim customers by allowing them to keep faithful to their religion.

A Lloyds spokesman said Islamic accounts were intended for customers who cannot receive or pay interest under sharia, but were available to anyone, regardless of their faith. More at

Creeping Shariah

National I.D is now here. Nine States non compliant for Domestic Flights as of 2018

Looks like the “Real National I.D National Drivers License is here. Earlier I posted: National Chip ID Card For American Citizens: ID Act Effective On May 11, 2011

 

It was delayed, but according to Adriennes Corner

the time is here. Best yet, the mark of the beast or rather, a chip is now implanted on all driver’s license except nine States have been dragging their feet. An RFID chip. And just how much does that chip do? I am getting ahead of myself. Here is what she says:

Residents In Nine States Will Need Passports For Domestic Flights in 2018…

 Seriously?

Seems so.

From Forbes:

When traveling, it’s best to plan ahead whenever you can. For example, you may have thought you don’t need a passport because you don’t travel outside the United States. But for residents of nine states, that will change at the beginning of 2018 for any commercial flight, whether international or domestic.
As reported by Travel and Leisure, nine states will no longer allow travelers to board an airplane with just their state issued driver’s licenses as of January 22, 2018. To get past TSA security checkpoints, another form of identification will be required: passport, permanent resident card/green card or a military ID.

Back to my original post:

Under the REAL ID state-issued driver’s licenses and identification cards have to meet federal standards or they will not be accepted for federal purposes–boarding commercial aircraft, gain access to federal facilities or enter nuclear power plants. From the government on the type of chip to be used: www.gpo.gov

Now, there is no debate as to whether or not the card will contain a chip that is capable of tracking people, the only debate has been around which tracking technology better suits their needs. Here are a few quotes again from the official government document:
“ DHS also invites comments on how States would or could incorporate a separate WHTI- compliant technology, such as an RFID-enabled vicinity chip technology, in addition to the REAL ID PDF417 barcode requirement.”

“States can leverage the same infrastructure that they will need to purchase for REAL ID to incorporate MRZ, proximity chips, and vicinity chip technology onto a driver’s license.”

“The use of RFID is essential to the WHTI program in order to ensure facilitation at crowded U.S. land and sea crossing points. Similar concerns are not implicated by REAL ID, which is one of the factors that led DHS to select the 2D bar code as the common machine readable technology on driver’s licenses and identification cards. DHS encourages States to explore alternative technologies on their driver’s licenses and identification cards in order to promote security and technology advances as well as e-government initiatives a State may wish to explore.”

“DHS does not believe that non-compliant driver’s licenses or credit cards are acceptable documents to establish identity.” Meaning – no chip, no ID. Doesn’t this remind you of something else?

Can you see where all of this is headed?  Many of the people that are attempting to implement this thing may have “good intentions”, but we all know what they say about “good intentions”.

If we put up with a national ID card, then the Obama administration will be emboldened to try to implement the “universal Internet ID” that they have been talking about.

The sad truth is that America is no longer “the land of the free“.  The government has decided that in order to keep us “safe”, everything that we do must be watched, tracked, traced, recorded and controlled.

  • Kentucky
  • Maine
  • Minnesota
  • Missouri
  • Montana
  • Oklahoma
  • Pennsylvania
  • South Carolina
  • Washington

Why it is difficult to respect Europeans

Why it is difficult to respect Europeans    by Mustang.

Mustang who also spins some great tales at Fix Bayonets and Thoughts From Afar

Ah, the Europeans … who, bless their little pea-pick ‘in hearts, seem to solidify into but two classes of human beings. In the first, we find those who tired of the tyranny of so-called noble aristocracy and moved … dare I suggest it? … to America. In America, they became frontiersmen, soldiers, sailors, farmers, entrepreneurs, politicians, judges, engineers, teachers, factory workers, miners, doctors, restaurateurs, steelworkers, cabbies, and dry-goods merchants. They were folks who made substantial contributions to America’s growth —and it is for this reason that we should take great pride in their accomplishments. The European emigre is part of the story of America.

Conversely, in the second group, we discover those who elected to stay behind, to do as they were told —including permitting themselves to be drawn into two horrific world wars, who believed that republican democracy and civic virtue was much too difficult, and that getting free stuff at everyone else’s expense was a pretty neat idea, even at the expense of their own economic and philosophical emancipation —who today have evolved into the kind of human beings that would never in a million years question anything their respective governments tell them. Somehow, in the dynamic of social evolution, they convinced themselves that their lives must surely benefit all of mankind —even if that means standing idly by while foreign swine rape their women and pillage their communities. It truly is amazing.

But, if for today we are only considering the de-evolution of Germany, then we should recognize that this one country has had a robust relationship with Moslem countries since the late 19th Century when the Germans ruled over substantial Islamic populations.

In this relationship, the Germans sought to use Islam as a tool of control, even including the recognition of Sharia courts, Islamic endowments, support of madrasas, and recognition of Islamic holidays and festivals. In these days, German officials ruled their Islamic holdings through Moslem intermediaries, who in this way, gave legitimacy to German occupation. In 1898, during his visit to the tomb of Saladin, Wilhelm II declared Germany as a friend to the world’s (then) 300 million Islamacists.

Subsequently, Germany mobilized Moslems living in British, French, and Russian territories to aid them during World War I. Although Germany failed to spread Jihad in 1914, German strategists nevertheless maintained a strong interest in Islamic geopolitics. It was a strategy revisited by the Germans during World War II—including Eberhard von Stoher’s suggestion that Germany adopt an extensive Islam program. Such a program was in fact created in late 1941, and which enlisted the support and participation of the Mufti of Jerusalem, Amin al-Husayni. Germany regarded the Moslems as a source of authority that would legitimize their involvement in the Third Reich, and even justify Islamic violence toward non-German infidels. To cement this relationship, Germany instructed German soldiers to respect Islamic traditions. Moreover, the Germans made extensive use of religious policies, ordered the construction of mosques, prayer halls, and madrasas. Similar programs were established in the Balkans, and Moslems were continuously reminded that the Bolsheviks were mostly their hated enemy, the Jews. In the Crimea, General Erich von Manstein demanded that Islamists eradicate the Jewish-Bolshevik wherever they may be found. Both the Wehrmacht and SS regarded the Islamists as welcome allies.

In the Balkans in 1943, Manstein continually consulted with Islamic officials. For their part, the Moslems hoped that Germany would assist them in establishing an Islamic state in the region. Having intensified partisan hatred of Germany, the plan to co-opt Moslems backfired; violence escalated, resulting in the death of a quarter of a million Islamists.

The wholesale murder of Europe’s Gypsies involved Muslims directly. According to one first-hand account, “The gypsies arrived en masse on carriages at the Talmud-Thora Building. For some reason, they raised a green flag, the symbol of Islam, and put a mullah at the head of their procession. The gypsies tried to convince the Germans and Moslems that they were not gypsies; some claimed to be Tatars, others to be Turkmens. But their protests were disregarded and they were all exterminated.”

According to Professor David Motadel at the University of Edinburgh, Hitler lamented to Martin Bormann in the final months of the war that Germany’s efforts to fully mobilize the Moslems had failed because the Islamacists were not strong enough … and had the movement succeeded, “just think of what we could have done to help them, even to incite them, as would have been both our duty and our interest.”

History is interesting, is it not? It should lead us now to wonder what is going on within Angela Markel’s inner circles as it relates to massive and uninterrupted Moslem migrations to Germany.

B-Ville has added this video. It was done in 2009. Chilling.

U.S. FUNDS ISLAMIC TERRORISTS

%d bloggers like this: