Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm Backs Requiring Military To Go Electric Vehicle Only By 2030


 

Can she really be that stupid? Where does she think all of this electricity comes from? Our enemies must be laughing their heads off and our friends, the few left, will surly look elsewhere for alliances.

Unreal ..and so when a vehicle is out of charge and stuck in hostile territory, you can call a timeout with your enemy and ask them to pick up battle after they politely guide you to the nearest charging station. These people are beyond help and a serious danger to our country.

Senator Joni Ernst asks, “Do you support support the military adopting that EV fleet by 2030?”

Granholm, ” I do.  And I think we can get there as well.”

 

 

Not enough Granholm?

Department of Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm doubled down on her praise of China for being the world’s largest “clean energy” technology investor, despite it also being the world’s largest emitter of CO2.

During a House Appropriations Subcommittee hearing, Chief Deputy Whip Guy Reschenthaler (R-PA) grilled Granholm about her comments on March 10, 2023, that “We can all learn from what China is doing” on the environment, and another remark saying that the U.S. did not have the moral authority to criticize China.

Reschenthaler asked Granholm if she was aware at that time that 30 percent of the world’s CO2 emissions came from China. Granholm responded, “Oh, yes.”

 

Let’s round it out with comments from Maria and her crew. One of the best take downs.

FOX Business’ Maria Bartiromo, Solus Alternative Asset Management strategist Dan Greenhaus and Fox News contributor Liz Peek discuss Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm for praising China’s ‘encouraging’ investment in clean energy.

 

 

That’s it folks. The best of the swamp.

27 Responses to “Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm Backs Requiring Military To Go Electric Vehicle Only By 2030”

  1. Baysider Says:

    K. So she’s got vehicles covered. Break out the skateboards.

    Now … what about all the black powder (and regular gunpowder) in weapons systems? Just in case this woman has never left a gun range smelling of sulfur … or seen the big guns of the USS Missouri loaded with 6-ft. long bags of black powder. So what’s the plan for the ammo Granny? Sharpen up your Roman short swords and slingshots? Maybe she should check in with history and find out what happened to one army when it ran out of gas … and t’other one didn’t. The “Look, the Germans have abandoned their tanks and are walking back to Germany” scene from the Battle of the Bulge.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. The Night Wind Says:

    These idiots actually believe that they’re invincible. They don’t really believe that foreign powers can do anything to stop them.

    As for these electric vehicles, it’s plugged into (pun intended) their other plans for 2030. They’ve been transforming our military mostly into a domestic ‘peacekeeping’ force (while relying on proxy-troops and US airpower to deal with foreign ‘threats’). By this time, they intend to have Smart Cities where ‘essential’ workers are corralled, so these electric vehicles are probably intended for internal police actions.

    That’s the same model they’ve been employing in Europe. US troops are stationed there, supposedly to contain the ‘Russian Threat’ (before that it was Iran was the ‘threat’, and before that ‘extremists’ in the former Iron Curtain countries). The real reason is that the Beltway is propping up their puppet governments who’d all be overthrown in a matter of weeks if they didn’t have the Pentagon at their backs.

    Liked by 2 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      I am amazed that the Netherlands has not had a rebellion big time… that they are taking the farms and this is all the farmers can come up with?

      Like

      • The Night Wind Says:

        There have bigger protests than our media reports. For example, in Holland they didn’t show the authorities knocking down barricades with bulldozers or the regular beatings and gassings the protesters get from police.

        The problem that Europe has is that those countries are geographically small and densely populated. It’s much easier for security forces to control even a massive urban demonstration than smaller one out in the wide-open spaces. Like Afghanistan and Vietnam: the cities were fairly easy to control, but the countryside was a death-trap for occupiers.

        Another advantage that the NATO/EU Deep States have is that they can bring in foreign militaries if they really start losing control—plus sanctions of the dollar and Euro if they don’t toe the line. I believe to this day that the Canadian protests were suppressed by foreign troops—probably from Ukraine and Poland.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bunkerville Says:

        Thanks for the analysis…makes sense

        Like

  3. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm Backs Requiring Military To Go Electric Vehicle By 2030 — BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades | Vermont Folk Troth Says:

    […] Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm Backs Requiring Military To Go Electric Vehicle Only By 2030 — … […]

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Mustang Says:

    I apologize, but I can’t help but have a few questions. Assuming that we’ll get these batteries from China, does it make sense to logistically ingratiate ourselves with a potential enemy? How many miles can we anticipate for an M1127, M1128, or M1129 before they need a recharge? How about for an M577A3? How about Assault Amphibian Vehicles? Well, the list of our armored, light-armored, un-armored, anti-aircraft, and prime movers is far too long to list here, but I think Bill made an exceptional point.

    And none of us are surprised that such silly crapola came out of Granholm’s mouth. She is a bona fide idiot, and such people rarely have a clue.

    Side note to all those utterly stupid people who voted for Biden, who selected all of these moronic cabinet officials — traitor!

    Liked by 2 people

  5. Bill Heffner Says:

    Well, my submarine (in 1960) was entirely driven by electric motors. Using big ass batteries no less. Of course, those batteries were charged by four huge diesel engines that we also had on board, but since when have Democrats ever cared about the source of the electric power that drives their precious electric cars?

    Liked by 3 people

  6. markone1blog Says:

    So, Bunker, is this the Biden regime way of trying to hold our next major war off until 2030 when these underpowered and lightly armored pieces of instant scrap will go on the battlefield?

    And they think they are having a hard time recruiting now.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. MaddMedic Says:

    Seems there is a daily competition amongst the Biden’s cabinet as to who can come up with the best stupid on a daily basis.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm Backs Requiring Military To Go Electric Vehicle Only By 2030 …….. – Freedom Is Just Another Word… Says:

    […] Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm Backs Requiring Military To Go Electric Vehicle Only By 2030 — … […]

    Liked by 2 people

  9. peter3nj Says:

    Secretary Grahamhole had been keen on direct current ever since she discovered her artificial pleasure toy could plug in to her cigarette lighter thereby saving the cost of motel rooms as she travels the country in her E-car.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Zilla Says:

    Ugh.
    Hi Bunk! I have missed you and I am delighted to see the blog still here!
    I gave this a reblog over at my new joint. You probably got the ping by now. XOXO

    Liked by 2 people

  11. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm Backs Requiring Military To Go Electric Vehicle Only By 2030 – AxZilla.com Says:

    […] Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm Backs Requiring Military To Go Electric Vehicle Only By 2030 […]

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Bigus Macus Says:

    She is just another low IQ clown in the Biden regime circus.

    Liked by 2 people


Leave a comment