Anatomy of a Stolen Election in Arizona – Does it Matter?


 

Maricopa County is the only jurisdiction in the country that picks up completed ballots at USPS Processing Distribution Center, but doesn’t bring them back to the election department or tabulation center. That is where this nasty tale begins,

I noticed in the clip I posted last week, that the explanation of what happened to a ballot submitted when the machines in Arizona weren’t working made no sense. Now we learn it was all part of the scam. We can only imagine that for these ballots that is exactly what happened to this poor fellow’s ballot. He and enough other ballots to turn the election.
 
 
 
 
 
Now we learn:

Maricopa County picks up mail-in ballots and takes them directly to its print vendor Runbeck Election Services, which is headquartered in Phoenix.

Every single completed mail-in ballot, whether mailed or dropped off at a polling place, goes to Runbeck. All mail-in ballots collected on election day, and the previous few days, are sitting at Runbeck headquarters. Maricopa has no idea how many ballots are in their possession because the ballots are at their print vendor.

Maricopa allegedly uses Runbeck because they have “high-speed scanners.” Runbeck scans the ballots in batches to create a digital image of each envelope signature area. This batch of images is given to the Maricopa tabulation center (MCTEC) for poll worker review. MCTEC notifies Runbeck if any of those signatures don’t match. Runbeck separates out those bad envelopes, then delivers both sets of these envelopes by van to MCTEC, which is 6 miles away. MCTEC then opens the envelopes and starts the tabulation process.

This “batch” process is repeated until all “mail-in” ballot envelopes are scanned at Runbeck. This takes 10-12 days after every general election, and ballots envelopes are delivered each day by Runbeck vans. Runbeck uses the Bluecrest Vantage mail processing machines to scan these ballot envelopes. This machine can process 40-50,000 ballots an hour. These machines can also automatically scan the ballot signatures using embedded commercial-grade check cashing signature software from Parascript. But Maricopa continues to use its slow manual “batch” process of reviewing signatures.

 
……
 
On Friday RAV reporter Ben Bergquam followed a Penske Truck from the Maricopa Election Center back to Runbeck several miles away. Once the truck arrived at Runbeck the gate was closed behind it. The fence prevents anyone from seeing inside the faciliy’s parking lot.
 
 

Keep reading

We keep hearing that a bevy of lawyers are on the job. Thats the GOP for us, On the job after the fact,

From one of the big cheerleaders along with Kari Lake that all will be well in the end. No one investigated this vote count process?

Harmeet K. Dhillon
 
“Lot of armchair scapegoating around. I’m still in the field working for candidates, filing lawsuits where appropriate & working for free as a grassroots volunteer. Once all votes are counted, I’ll share my views on what we need to do to change outcomes. Till then keep fighting!”
 
 
We learn that what is happening is perfectly normal for “decades.”Of course. Warning rough language.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We pick up the another story: What caused this?

The cause of Arizona’s massive 30% machine tabulator failure is identified.  This action disproportionately affected Republicans and assured delays in counting. 

Technical expert, Dan Sundin, has homed in on the likely cause of why 30% of the tabulators in Arizona could not process the majority of Republican ballots on Election Day.

During the 2022 General Election, the election programming was set up to process 20” long ballots. This was a change from the 2020 General and the 2022 Primary ballots, which were 19” long – an inch shorter.

So when Arizona election officials say they don’t know what happened on November 8th because everything was the same as Arizona’s primary – this isn’t true.

The sample ballot pdfs published by Maricopa County and the Runbeck-printed ballots used for mail-in voting were correctly made to 20” length in the 2022 General. So there have been no problems processing Democrat-leaning, mail-in ballots.

However, the ballot-on-demand printers used for in-person voting only have 19″ trays that contain 19” ballot paper.

This means, that for in-person voting, the official ballot image had to be compressed to fit on smaller paper than it was built for.

Compression causes the ink to be a little lighter than it should be and thus affects how the tabulators read the ballot.

Maricopa County directed some voting centers to increase how dark the printing was, and this helped the problem somewhat.

Read more

The best of the swamp. The very best.

40 Responses to “Anatomy of a Stolen Election in Arizona – Does it Matter?”

  1. Baysider Says:

    Good. Gawd.

    re: “It would also be a good idea for optics if the company involved had not given a major donation to the Democrats.” Another Good. Gawd.

    So … what would be wrong about returning to handmarked paper ballots with pairs counting them? (Yeah, harder to cheat.)

    Liked by 3 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      I am all in. The Constitution states the date for the election. I sure wish someone would take all of this various nonsense to the courts.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Baysider Says:

        Can’t find link to this cartoon, so just imagine. Uncle Sam standing in the road holding up a copy of the constitution. A tank – new California laws – is coming straight at him blaring “step away from the constitution sir.”

        Liked by 3 people

  2. If All You See... - Pirate's Cove » Pirate's Cove Says:

    […] blog of the day is Bunkerville, with a post on the election problems in Maricopa […]

    Liked by 1 person

  3. geeez2014 Says:

    Wondering if you all feel that Katie Hobbs, as Sec of State, who’s probably beating Lake, should have recused herself since her position is in charge of elections?

    Liked by 2 people

    • Mustang Says:

      When you’re the official in charge of elections, how do you recuse yourself? I may be naïve here, but I think the system more-or-less runs automatically. Hobbs doesn’t personally count the ballots. There is an Under-secretary of State who does that, and Hobbs has a wide margin of plausible deniability. But in speaking with Bunkerville earlier today, she’s absolutely right to observe that corruption runs rife inside the U.S., and the best argument for this is that below the elected personages are the permanent bureaucrats … and they’re the ones whom Soros et.al. are currying favor with. Think about this for a moment. Who do most bureaucrats vote for, and why? They vote for Democrats because Democrats believe in BIG government, and BIG government guarantees bureaucrats’ jobs. And even if someone “got caught” manipulating the election results (which is easier than most people think), you don’t get fired until you’ve been warned on two other occasions. Lots of wiggle room, ya know?

      Liked by 1 person

      • geeez2014 Says:

        It’s not I who has suggested it had been better to recuse herself because she is a candidate in the proceedings she oversees. It’s Kari Lake and others who’ve suggested this; My thought was “recuse from what, her position NOW or running for any other position like governor?”! I was curious because, like you, I wondered just how much she could do in her existing position.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bunkerville Says:

        It would also be a good idea for optics if the company involved had not given a major donation to the Democrats.

        Liked by 3 people

      • bunkerville Says:

        Z.. in the end, it is she who will affix her name to certifying the election. Once she does that….. thats my thought…it will be very difficult to move forward in contesting the election.

        Like

      • geeez2014 Says:

        BUNK: “it will be very difficult to move forward in contesting the election.” That actually supports the idea of her recusing herself early on……..By the way, I do NOT think it’ll be ‘very difficult’ for Kari Lake to ‘move forward in contesting…’ !!!

        Liked by 1 person

  4. nrringlee Says:

    As a small ‘l’ libertarian, small ‘r’ republican for many decades I look at this and wonder how, in a country where data systems came to be we can be so stupid. Simple answer, it can’t. This is the New Jim Crow. When precincts are targeted with printer errors the ‘de facto’ cause for action should come in to play. That is, of course unless those precincts and polling sites are in conservative and libertarian neighborhoods. Then not so much.

    The bride and I just returned from a weekend sojourn to the Republic of Maricopa. Back home in Mohave County, safe and sound. From now on my focus is on my county.

    Liked by 3 people

  5. Silverfiddle Says:

    So, do the rejected ballots end up getting processed and counted?

    How does Maricopa using an antiquated system promote fraud?

    Are they doing something that makes the election un-auditable?

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      SF.. I am simply a conspiracy theorist as such….when there are districts that have more voters than population. Why yes, that is my theory.
      We simply are not on the same page. Lets leave it at that. .. must go, have to to get my tin foil ordered.
      P.S.. I am sure Chicago back in 1960 was a conspiracy too…

      Liked by 1 person

      • Silverfiddle Says:

        Good evidence can stand critical cross-examination. Do we have an election audit anywhere that records more votes cast than voters?

        Like

      • bunkerville Says:

        SF Sometimes common sense works… off the top of my head doesn’t this seem a bit strange discovered after the election in 2020 from NPR.. Tell me why are the challenges to recount in AZ earlier and elsewhere fought to the death?

        Like

      • Silverfiddle Says:

        Why aren’t good Republicans on the ground, poll watchers, challenging these supposed thefts?

        Like

      • bunkerville Says:

        SF. Why not make your best argument why you think there are no problems with the honesty of our elections?
        That is the best way to roll here.
        I always enjoyed your posts when you were blogging at your first site. Maybe you spent too much time over at Always on Watch with all that bickering. Now at your new blog- which by the way I was happy to hear you were posting again– you seem to encourage and enjoy endless bickering which for the most part fails to enlighten. Why not get back to the good work you are known for?

        Like

      • Silverfiddle Says:

        The person alleging nefarious activity bears the responsibility to bring evidence. I am open to the possibility of election fraud, but so far, its been all smoke and no fire.

        We had two recent cases of prosecutable voter fraud, in Philadelphia (Democrats), and North Carolina (Republicans). Prosecutors drilled down and prosecuted people pretty quickly.

        I’m waiting for something similar in Arizona.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Mustang Says:

      Arizona and New Mexico compete on a regular basis for the title of Most Corrupt Political System. It’s hard to tell who’s ahead in any one election year. We could sort this out with a few more people like Billy the Kid and the Earp brothers. Until then, not so much. I had to laugh noting the Sheriff’s vehicle blocking the parking lot. Traditionally, country sheriffs in AZ and NM are THE most corrupt officials in the history of world corruption. So, a sheriff’s squad car does not equal “good feelings” about the viability of county elections. For whatever that’s worth …

      Liked by 1 person

      • bunkerville Says:

        In Florida one can check on ones ballot along the way. After I moved my name stays on the roll one more year. I could go in and see if it had been used. First time I registered they took my Drivers ID with pic…and signature.Once they have that…. I would say a good move.

        Liked by 1 person

  6. peter3nj Says:

    At least the bride of Frankenstein has nice legs.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Mustang Says:

    My guess is that there are answers to questions once the questions are asked, and one could begin an investigation with massive numbers of rental trucks. Not too hard. But of course, if the people of Arizona aren’t upset with the result of fraudulent elections, why bother asking questions?

    Liked by 2 people

  8. markone1blog Says:

    At least Harris County Republicans seem to be lawyering up and bringing suit against those who pulled these tricks (refer to my post today). Problem is that the main stream media (aka the Houston Comical and the television stations in the area [except for a few reporters at KRIV]) are ignoring the most of this story. The few blurbs they do release on the issue make it sound like these Republicans are crazy conspiracy theorists.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. peter3nj Says:

    It would be fair to say were the shoe on the other foot the democrat parade led by Schumer and Pelosi, the Arizona National Guard, CIA, FBI, BLM, Antifa, Black Panthers-oops:The New Black Panthers, Al Sharpton, Obama and Reverend Wright (is he still alive?) would be storming the gates to get inside. The employees would be led out in shackles.
    Flashback to today where we find the , republican hierarchy once again having been blewed, screwed and tattooed without a kiss silently crawling back into their holes. Of course no one saw this coming. NEXT!!!!

    Liked by 2 people

    • markone1blog Says:

      Peter,
      I fully agree. As recently as this past summer, a group of Democrats fled from Texas to break quorum on a voter integrity bill in Texas. They claimed that having to show state-provided identification would disenfranchise Black and Brown voters.

      Now, these Democrats seem to think that having people wait hours in line and then turning them does not disenfranchise them. These Democrats think that telling them to “just eat cake” and rearrange their day to go to another polling place does not disenfranchise them. These Democrats think that having a polling place run out of paper at a crucial hour does not disenfranchise voters. These Democrats would like us to believe that their busloads of voters brought in on a judge’s whim don’t disenfranchise real voters.

      Additionally, these Democrats seem to think that having ballot counts where there are more ballots cast than voters does not point to Democrat tricks.

      Liked by 1 person


Leave a comment