Why Does Interpol Need Immunity from American Law?

While the National Review comments that “for no apparent reason, Zero signed this bill while we were not watching,, we were posting on this months ago– the intent? The Copenhagen meeting had much on the agenda besides global warming and this is the first step in what Bill Bennett had warned about.

You just can’t make up how brazen this crowd is. One week ago, President Obama quietly signed an executive order that makes an international police force immune from the restraints of American law.

 Specifically, previously Interpol’s property and assets remained subject to search and seizure, and its archived records remained subject to public scrutiny under provisions like the Freedom of Information Act. Being constrained by the Fourth Amendment, FOIA, and other limitations of the Constitution and federal law that protect the liberty and privacy of Americans is what prevents law-enforcement and its controlling government authority from becoming tyrannical.

On Wednesday, however, for no apparent reason, President Obama issued an executive order removing the Reagan limitations. That is, Interpol’s property and assets are no longer subject to search and confiscation, and its archives are now considered inviolable. This international police force (whose U.S. headquarters is in the Justice Department in Washington) will be unrestrained by the U.S. Constitution and American law while it operates in the United States and affects both Americans and American interests outside the United States.

Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files which, therefore, will be beyond the ability of Congress, American law-enforcement, the media, and the American people to scrutinize?

Watch out for U.N. Copenhagen-they say deal impossible, but

… The E.U. is on board. One of the main features is a one world government where countries wind up giving up many of their rights to a commision, including a legal system. https://bunkerville.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/watch-out-for-u-n-copenhagen-they-say-deal-impossible-but/

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MGY3MTI4YTRjZmYwMGU1ZjZhOGJmNmQ0NmJiZDNmMDY=