Sanctuary – the danger of civil disobedience


We started out with sanctuary churches for illegals, then wholesale cities to States. We have included protecting illegals to those using marihuana. Conservatives are getting into the act now claiming the Second Amendment with gun control as their right to using State sanctuary of counties and towns for the use of this new found “right.” Police authorities claim they will not enforce the rule of State laws.

Mustang gives us his take on illegal use of “Sanctuary” and its impact regarding illegal immigration. Just where will this new found “Right” take us? How far will it go?

Why Sanctuary?

by Mustang

In law, “sanctuary community” has no standing because in the United States, no one is above the law.  No state may refuse to obey federal laws in matters constitutionally assigned to federal authority.  No community within a state has the right to ignore federal authority.

When communities declare themselves sanctuary entities, they are in effect exercising a kind of civil disobedience, which may be (and should be) punished under the law.  Under American law, there is no legitimacy attached to civil disobedience —no matter what arguments may be used to justify it by law breakers.

But the issue has taken on a new dimension.  Not only do civil administrators declare their intent to ignore federal law, they produce writs that prohibit constitutionally sworn police officers from obeying federal laws, as well.  It is a dangerous conspiracy that threatens the United States, its several states, and communities within those states.

Cloward and Piven at the Motor Voter signing law

I believe that “conspiracy” is the correct word for what is happening in the United States today.  A refusal of obey federal law with respect to immigration appears related to the so-called Cloward-Piven strategy devised in 1966, the purpose of which was to overwhelm the lawful exercise of federal power to such an extent that federalism fails; a situation in which the federal government can no longer execute its Constitutional authority or mandate.

Sanctuary cities may not be the most important issue facing the Department of Justice, but if one believes that illegal immigration has reached the point where it imposes a clear and present danger to the security of the United States, its several states, its thousands of communities, then the federal government must act to settle this issue permanently.

Let’s recap:

  • Illegal immigration is illegal.
  • Illegal immigration is a burden to lawful citizens in terms of taxes, infrastructure, access to policing, medical treatment facilities, public education, and community services.
  • Illegal aliens pay less in taxes (sales taxes, etc.) than they receive through state and local services (Source: Congressional Budget Office).
  • The presence of illegal aliens poses a significant risk to lawful residents in terms of violent crimes, drugs, drunk drivers, community health and sanitation.

On 9 January 2020, Ms. Maria Fuentes, aged 92, a citizen of Richmond Hill, Queens, New York, was brutally raped and murdered at the intersection of Liberty Avenue and 127th Street in Richmond Hill by 21-year old Reeaz Khan, an illegal alien from Guyana.  Reeaz was roaming the streets of New York City despite a federal order for his deportation for prior assault and illegal weapons charges.

He was roaming free on the streets of New York City because the New York City Police Department refused to honor a federal retainer request.  Quite naturally, the NYPD now claims that they never received such a request from federal law enforcement agencies.

The evidence of this particular case shows that Reeaz Khan pounced upon his 92-year old victim from behind, throwing her to the ground, sexually assaulting her, and then ran from the scene of his crime.

This illegal alien has now been charged with seven charges, including second degree murder, first degree manslaughter, first degree attempted rape, first degree sexual assault, and tampering with physical evidence.  Reeaz claims that he came upon the woman, found that she was passed out, and tried to render aid but in the process, his pants fell down and his genitals came in contact with hers.  I hope he has a masterful attorney.

DHS Acting Secretary Chad Wolf observed that New York City is in a state of complete breakdown of law and order and blames this partly on New York City’s sanctuary policies.  Wolf said, “NYC proudly passed sanctuary city laws and bragged about it for months.  But now the citizens of NYC are facing the deadly consequences of these sanctuary policies.

In 2019, New York City experienced 300 murders, an increase of 8% over the murder rate of 2018.  Maybe sanctuary policies aren’t working as well as everyone on the left claims.  Nor should we forget the senseless murder of Kate Steinle in San Francisco, California —the home of Democrat Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Sanctuary is not a new concept.  In times past, the word refers to a wide range of protective measures that may be taken by communities on behalf of those who residents believed deserve protection.  Lately, though, we have taken the word sanctuary and added to it the word community, but in the absence of any statute that defines sanctuary city, we find the notion somewhat confusing.

In law, “sanctuary community” has no standing because in the United States, no one is above the law.  No state may refuse to obey federal laws in matters constitutionally assigned to federal authority.  No community within a state has the right to ignore federal authority.

Thanks to If All You See… » Pirate’s Cove

For blog of the day!

Other than that, all is well in the swamp.

Mustang also blogs at Fix Bayonets and Thoughts From Afar

14 Responses to “Sanctuary – the danger of civil disobedience”

  1. writegardener Says:

    I can’t believe Sanctuary Cities are even allowed to exist in the USA, much less entire states and illegals thumbing their nose at our federal government. I have no problem with legal immigrants who assimilate and contribute to our country. Sanctuary cities and political correctness have been 2 of the most destructive changes I’ve seen in the last number of years. I fully support retaining borders, language and culture.


  2. If All You See… » Pirate's Cove Says:

    […] blog of the day is Bunkerville, with a post on the danger of civil […]


  3. peter3nj Says:

    It must be far better to have a minimal number of dead sexually assaulted and raped american women than illegal foreigners rotting in jail with their select dietary needs, flat screen satellite TVs, weight rooms, basketball courts, medical and dental care, cell phones and the latest prison fashions. Soon they may be subjected to conjugal visits by their women spirited into the country by Air Force One come 2025. Oh crap…my meds!

    Liked by 3 people

    • Mustang Says:

      A friend recently sent me a video that shows three illegal women who were arrested in separate incidents for shoplifting in the Rio Grande Valley. One of these women stole four (4) handguns from Dick’s Sporting Goods. She had all four of these weapons stuffed inside her bra. The second woman had stolen so much off the shelves at Wal-Mart that her booty filled up half of one of their standard size shopping trolleys. The third woman lifted out of her dress two (2) automobile batteries. One wonders about the bra and the batteries (which are heavy —two of them— talk about abdomen control). So the question is, do we really want illegal Hispanic women visiting their husbands (or, at least, the alleged father of her children) in “tightly controlled” prisons?

      I’m thinking …. nah.

      Liked by 1 person

      • peter3 Says:

        You’re absolutely correct. Some of these guys from America Central are so tiny they could fit inside their woman’s poncho and no self respecting prison guard would put his career on the line by suggesting a brown female might do something unladylike.
        **** car batteries, really? 🤣

        Liked by 2 people

      • markone1blog Says:

        Considering the jolt that a car battery can deliver, pulling those things out in the area of the chest could have delivered a fatal shock.

        Liked by 3 people

  4. markone1blog Says:

    I predict that this site will be shadow-banned by Google, since it communicates too much common sense and rationality.

    Liked by 4 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      Ten years ago Google included bloggers in their search results quite often… I started out carrying all of the individual votes of the House and Senate… Vote Tally Count…….would be the header… I was at the top of the search results and would get thousands of hits… as I recall they even had a specific search for blogger results…. FB would a nice way to keep in touch with kids and nephews and nieces… no more… times change.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Mustang Says:

      Completely agree with you about the offerings at Bunkerville but have to make a stipulation. In America today, common sense isn’t all that common.

      Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: