While you were asleep the 9th circuit declared ‘Open Borders”


For any GOP Senator who cannot get their act together and support Trump’s Executive Order regarding funding the border, take a look at what the 9th circuit did last week. We have Open Borders now. And it is here. Well worth the full read guys in case you missed what happened.


Congress could never get away with creating constitutional rights for illegal aliens to remain here, yet a single lower court just did so on Thursday. And where Congress would face deep reprisal in the next election, faceless judges will never feel the heat.

Conservatives fear that extreme Democrats might actually abolish ICE and all immigration enforcement, but the lower courts are already systematically abolishing ICE’s authority, nullifying immigration enforcement statutes, violating separation of powers, and constantly increasing the wave of bogus asylum-seekers that they originally spawned with other radical rulings.

The latest ruling from the Ninth Circuit demonstrates that unless Republicans and the president begin pushing back against these radical judges and delegitimizing their rulings, Democrats will get everything they want without ever facing electoral backlash or even the need to win elections.

It’s truly hard to overstate the outrageously harmful effects of Thursday’s Ninth Circuit ruling. For the first time in our history, the courts have fabricated a constitutional right for those denied asylum to appeal to federal courts for any reason.

Here’s the background.

Hundreds of thousands of migrants are flooding our border, claiming the formula of “credible fear” of persecution. They get to stay indefinitely while they ignore their court dates in immigration court. Because of an amalgamation of several prior activist court rulings, mainly by this very circuit, roughly 90 percent of credible fear claims are approved by asylum officers and the claimants shielded from deportation, even though asylum status is ultimately rejected almost every time by an immigration judge.

Unfortunately, by that point it’s too late for the American people, who are stuck with the vast majority of these claimants remaining indefinitely in the country.

Yet rather than ending this sham incentive, the Ninth Circuit drove a truck through immigration law by asserting that there is now a constitutional right for even the few who are denied initial credible fear status and are placed in deportation proceedings to appeal their denials, not just to an administrative immigration judge but to a federal Article III judge for any reason. More at Zero Hedge


The Venezuela Crisis – Where the refugees are headed, why we should care


The biggest migration in South American history is taking place and here is why it should matter to us. They are not just coming our way, but are putting enormous strain on their South American neighbors.

Looks like for now 290k for us. For now. Considering the number we have pounding on the door, it’s probably small change. Better yet, I bet they don’t have the Marxist fever that at present is sweeping our land. Maybe a couple of these folks could chat with Bernie, Cortez and friends about how this Communism thing worked out for them.

Some four hundred thousand have claimed asylum from political persecution and violence, and another million have gained other forms of residency. Hundreds of thousands of others, however, lack legal residency, and with it, access to employment, education, and social services. It is one of the largest and swiftest mass migrations in Latin America’s history, and the United Nations has characterized the situation as a humanitarian crisis [PDF].


The chart shows 3.4 million refugees from Venezuela since 2015. That’s 10 percent of the population. 10 percent of the US population would be 33 million. The UN, the European Union and the US with allies should see this as a disaster and demand change.


Venezuela is in the midst of an unprecedented political and economic crisis, the effects of which are rippling across the hemisphere and beyond. Wracked by hyperinflation, severe food and medicine shortages, soaring crime rates, and an increasingly authoritarian executive, more than 2.7 million Venezuelans—approximately 9 percent of the population—have fled the country in the past four years.

More at

Council on Foreign Relations

Illegal alien set free from Sanctuary City rapes child, previously deported


You have to look at illegal aliens through the eyes of the Democrats. What is the mental and physical well-being of a child, compared to gaining another Democrat voter?

The child is merely collateral damage as far as they are concerned. Juan Ramon-Vasquez was arrested in Philadelphia and refused to honor ICE’s detainer request. Ramon-Vasquez celebrated his release by repeatedly raping a young child over a period of time.

He has since been sentenced to 21 months for being in the country unlawfully and another 20 years for the child rape. Thank you liberals. This child would never have been raped without your invaluable help.

From the city of brotherly love… We knew it was going to go this way. Just one of many of similar stories that will not get the attention it deserves.



After being deported in 2009, Ramon-Vasquez was found to be living back in the country in March 2014 in Philadelphia. At the time, the illegal alien child rapist was in Philadelphia Prison Department custody, but the local authorities refused to turn Ramon-Vasquez over to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents for deportation due to the city’s sanctuary city policy that shields criminal illegal aliens from arrest and deportation.

From Breitbart News

H/T: David Harris

Just a thought – this should help with the crime stats.

Democrats don’t want ICE notified when illegals try and buy a gun


Oh this should work out swell. Not enough that it’s open border time. Let’s be sure and give them a bonus card for being too stupid to try and sign up for a gun. By the way, I wonder just why our newly minted illegals would want a gun? Any ideas folks?


As the debate over illegal immigration continues to rage, Democrats continue to prove they are proponents of open borders and lawlessness.

The latest example comes from Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz, who is berating Democrats for protecting illegal aliens who attempt to purchase firearms and fail a background check.

From Gaetz Tweet:

Democrats in the Judiciary Committee just voted against notifying ICE when an illegal alien fails a background check to buy a gun. They hate ICE so much that they’d keep ICE in the dark when illegals try to get guns!


Town Hall

The FBI this year has barred a record number of cases of illegal immigrants from buying guns, according to a new report of background checks.

The National Instant Criminal Background Check System listed 7,836,600 “illegal/unlawful alien” as of 2018.

That number has been increasing in recent years.

Illegal immigrants rank at the top of those on the FBI’s “prohibited category.”

The Great Wall of Chi … er, America


The Great Wall of Chi … er, America

by Mustang

A small fence separates densely populated Tijuana, Mexico, right, from the United States in the Border Patrol’s San Diego Sector.

All we hear in the press these days is the twaddle that surrounds the so-called Trump Wall.  One would think that this whole thing began about the time Donald Trump announced his candidacy for the presidency of the United States.  Actually, the discussion has been ongoing for quite some time.

Congress mandated construction of a border all along 670 miles of the US-Mexico border as part of the Secure Fence Act of 2006; the Consolidated Appropriations Act of FY-2008 extended the mandate to an additional 370 miles.  The actual distance between Brownsville, Texas and San Diego, California is 1,553 miles.


According to some, the US plan for a southern wall has generated “significant” opposition and demands for further consultation and deliberation, most of this from among those who fervently believe that open borders best suit the national interests, and from among international sources who should benefit most from open borders.  This is no doubt partially true.  There are also demands for the construction of a barrier to illegal trespass across the US southern border with Mexico.

Constructing a wall along the southern border is not an easy task.  Congress, in favor of a wall in 2006 now appears opposed to it … or at least, its cost.  Forgotten in this discussion is the cost of not having a hardened border with Mexico.  Given our entire history with Mexico, it imprudent not to have a barrier that channels people to certain entry points to the United States.  That issue aside, the wall will also require consideration of private property rights, environmental concerns, and the question of Indian lands (formerly called reservations); a wall might actually divide these properties between two countries.

The wall, if it is ever constructed, will not be a solid barrier along the entire border region, Texas to California.  Nor has this ever been proposed.  The wall will be segmented, and there will be significant gaps between these segments.  For example, the wall will extend from the Pacific Ocean south of San Diego, to El Centro, California.

The wall begins again south of Yuma, Arizona.  The distance between these two cities is over 60 miles.  If a single border patrolman could effectively monitor a single linear mile, it would take more than 180 patrolmen to secure this open segment over a 24-hour period, although even more patrol officers might be required during hours of darkness without additional technological monitoring devices.

After Trump’s speech on immigration, the totally subjective National Public Radio did an analysis and “fact check” of the points Mr. Trump made.  One of these analyses concluded, “Trump has made crime committed by immigrants in the U.S. illegally a major theme of his campaign. While he has spotlighted several real cases of murders committed by people in the country illegally, the context here is important.  Multiple analyses have found that immigrants commit violent crime at a lower rate than those born in the United States.” — Source: Sarah McCammon, NPR.

Of course, NPR analyst McCammon only cited one source (not multiple), which happened to be conclusions fielded by the American Immigration Council, a liberal advocacy group for unrestricted immigration.

Well, of course crimes committed by illegal immigrants would be at a lower rate given the fact that the US population is around 330 million, and the illegal alien population around five percent of that.  These criticisms of Trump are not very helpful, particularly since it wasn’t Trump that came up with the idea to begin with.

The Democratically controlled Congress led by Nancy Pelosi did that.  Moreover, NPR is promulgating dishonest, completely subjective information for public consumption.  Ignoring that, what does it matter?  If illegal aliens committing crimes were not in the US to begin with, victim’s lives (however many were lost) would have been saved.



In any case, this NPR report is precisely why the American people give little credibility to the American press.  I do wonder if members of the press realize how irrelevant they’ve become.

State Department Approves Child Brides – Legal Under U.S. Law


I will go out on a limb and opine that the approval of bringing in child brides into our country by our State Department is probably the result of the Muslim infiltration into our government. How else to explain the actions? Read the full AP story.

So now we have judges ruling FGM ban  unconstitutional and our government approving child abuse. So much for our Judeo-Christian values.


Federal Ban on Female Genital Mutilation Ruled Unconstitutional

Nov 21, 2018 – A federal judge in Michigan has dropped most of the charges against a Detroit doctor accused of female genital mutilation, concluding that Congress “overstepped its bounds” when it passed a law banning the practice. That 1996 law violates the Constitution and is unenforceable.

As a result, he dropped six federal charges against Jumana Nagarwala, who was accused of mutilating the genitals of multiple girls when they were about 7. Other defendants charged with assisting in the procedures have also had charges dropped.



The State Department has approved thousands of requests made by older men to bring child or adolescent brides to the country in the past decade, according to an Associated Press report published Friday and based on government data.

In nearly all the cases, the girls were the younger person in the relationship. In 149 instances, the adult was older than 40, and in 28 cases the adult was over 50, the committee found. In 2011, immigration officials approved a 14-year-old’s petition for a 48-year-old spouse in Jamaica. A petition from a 71-year-old man was approved in 2013 for his 17-year-old wife in Guatemala.


The State Department approved 5,556 requests made from adults who were looking to bring minor spouses or fiancées to the United States and 2,926 requests made by minors that were seeking to have older spouses brought in. The agency also reportedly approved 204 requests made by minors seeking to bring in spouses who were also minors.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is the first step for consideration of petitions for spouses or fiancées.

Data gathered by the news agency revealed that in the majority of cases, girls were the youngest in the relationship. In nearly 150 cases, the man seeking to bring minor spouses or fiancées to the U.S. was over the age of 40.

H/T: The Hill

Full story over a the Associated Press

Border Wall called a ‘Con’ For Trump’s ‘Rube Ten-Toothed Base’


Yesterday was a red letter day for the Democrats and Nancy Pelosi in particular. How to select the one special moment that defined the total nonsense resulting from the Democrats taking control of the House. Let’s not review the vulgar impeachment remark.

No need for me to document the very many absurdities.

How about this one? Rick Wilson Slams Border Wall As a ‘Con’ For Trump’s ‘Rube Ten-Toothed Base’

So let’s take a spin over to CNN and Rick Wilson. We are deplorable, irredeemable, known as those with low-sloping foreheads.

Now we are the toothless souls. Many hard working Americans who cannot afford the outrageous dentistry costs. But how would he know? (Does anyone think that someone cannot come up with a substance to coat our teeth early on to preclude cavities?) But I digress.


Here are the disgusting remarks made.



Tucker Carlson gave a worthy response to the offensive remarks of Rick Wilson.


%d bloggers like this: