U.S. NHTSA reinstates billions in fines on gas-guzzling automakers


So goes the headline in the only article I could find that covered this story in any depth this morning. Right, an obvious electric car pushing organization. Just who do they think will pay these fines? Trump had suspended the CAFE Standard that auto makers had said were too difficult to make. But in Biden’s move to reverse anything Trump did to make our U.S. economy run, now moves to automakers. Our cars soon will be made of plastic. Unsafe at any speed. As for the working man’s truck? Forget about it.

The comparison argument that EV’s can make the standard thus no reason Detroit can is absurd on the face of it. Where are all these EV’s coming from? Who is going to pay for them? No doubt more checks from Uncle Sam. Worse they have designed a monopoly game of trading “credits”.

Anyone else recall the “cash for clunkers?”  Pouring concrete into engine blocks on perfectly working automobiles. Coming soon. You Betcha. The man said he was going to do it.

Way to go Joe.

Electrek:

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ruled that heightened fines on automakers that fail to meet Corporate Average Fuel Economy requirements on 2019 and later vehicles would be reinstated. The decision is a big hit to high-polluting automakers and the lobby group that supports them, and a win for EV makers. 

The decision comes after years of fighting over a policy adopted in 2016 under President Obama that would apply to 2019 and later model year cars. The policy increased the fines for missing average fuel economy targets from $5.50 to $14 per .1 mpg per vehicle, in response to a 2015 law meant to catch old government penalties up to inflation. This is the first significant increase in this penalty since CAFE rules were first established in 1975 (the penalty was originally $5, then $5.50 since 1997).

Automakers who manage to stay within the limits gain credits that can be sold to other automakers who would otherwise be penalized. Automakers’ compliance or lack thereof can be found in DOT’s CAFE dashboard, where it can be seen that FCA missed the 40.9 mile-per-gallon target by nearly 11 mpg in 2020 (CAFE mpg is not calculated the same way as normal mpg and is more generous, thus the high numbers).

While automakers have long made the argument that compliance with such high CAFE targets is technologically impossible, the dashboard shows that Tesla exceeded the same 40.9 mpg target by 685 mpg. Surely other automakers with a century of experience can do better than 1/20th of Tesla’s efforts?

That risk seems to have turned out poorly for the automakers, as they’ll be writing some big checks for their noncompliance soon. The final rule takes effect 60 days after its publication in the federal register, and automakers who didn’t plan properly to increase their efficiency and incorporate more EVs into their fleet will continue paying these penalties for years to come – much of which is likely to end up in their EV competitors’ pockets via the trading of credits.

Coming to our town soon.

1958 BMW Isetta in USA

1958 BMW Isetta in USA

Other than that all is well in the swamp.

For the best in conservative news push the button.

19 Responses to “U.S. NHTSA reinstates billions in fines on gas-guzzling automakers”

  1. U.S. NHTSA reinstates billions in fines on gas-guzzling automakers;;;; – Freedom Is Just Another Word… Says:

    […] U.S. NHTSA reinstates billions in fines on gas-guzzling automakers — BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and G… […]

    Liked by 1 person

  2. markone1blog Says:

    Let’s see. Electric cars cost between $55,000 and $110,000. However, as demand goes up, price will follow. Today’s power from the electric socket costs 9.7 cents per kWh (as long as you get 1kWh / month); however, that will change as demand goes up.

    At the same time, everything shipped to our stores by diesel is going up (thanks to Dementia Joe). Likewise, the cost of getting to work until we all get magic carts powered by unicorn farts is going (well, you know where).

    Like

    • markone1blog Says:

      By the by, did you know that it takes more than 1 kWh to charge a kW into a rechargeable car battery? And as the battery gets older, the more juice you have to add to it to get it to charge to the degree needed to move a car.

      Were you additionally aware that car batteries on electric cars wear out fairly quickly, are the most expensive part of the car, and are very environmentally dangerous?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Baysider Says:

        Check to both those, Mark. Batteries projected to last 10-20 years, depending on whose PR you read. An actual user complained of sticker shock when she found out she would have to replace in 5 or 6 years, at a cost upwards of $5,000 including labor. 😤 😤 😤
        Then – where do the old batteries go?

        Honorable mention:
        Drop off in power as the electricity moves down the grid. Is this comparable to the cost to transport gas to the source of use? I don’t know. But no one seems to want to factor it as part of the true cost of getting power.

        Super honorable mention:
        Deep within the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act that was signed into law by President Joe Biden is a passage that will require automakers to begin including what can be best summarized as a “vehicle kill switch” within the operating software of new cars, which is described in the bill as “advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology.”

        It could also be described without the “drunk and impaired part” to simply “advanced driving prevention technology.” Check your social credit score lately? Forget Thanksgiving dinner at grandma’s if your controllers don’t agree with your actions. The same controllers that are booting people off social media left and right (well, mostly “right”).

        Liked by 1 person

      • bunkerville Says:

        B.. More good news from you…. and someone on T.V. gave a report on the ongoing costs of maintenance. They lead us to believe that it is minimal. Not. Now Biden is claiming under the war powers act that his Green agenda should go on steroids. Stop the world or at least him.

        Like

      • Baysider Says:

        War powers act? He IS demented!

        Liked by 1 person

    • markone1blog Says:

      So, based on your observations, will Biden be the “president” to take America to the Stone Age?

      Or, based on my observations, will Biden be the “president” to throw America into the maw of an environmental disaster while trying to avoid the unproven “climate change” tripe?

      Like

    • Baysider Says:

      PS to my comment below: WHO pays 9.7 cents per kWh? Our local costs are in 3 tiers:
      Cheapest: 20 ¢/kWh
      Midrange: 26¢/kWh
      Highest: 46¢/kWh

      Our bills get into Tier 2 now, but we have a heating system with a blower so it’s more than the gravity heater we used to have.

      So now, I get to add a whopping car charge bill on to that? Is there a solution? I know – “subsidies” to make you feel big daddy is looking after your needs.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. peter3nj Says:

    Having no expertise whatsoever in this area the only two cents I can add is it’s a sure bet these corporations will not only write checks for millions if not billions in fines but whatever is left in their petty cash accounts will be sent to the DNC to support democrat candidates for dog catcher to POTUS. What a joke. Too bad the hot air in DC can’t be converted to a useable energy source.

    Liked by 5 people

  4. Layla Elizabeth Kanas-Gonzalez Says:

    This administration is out of its minds. Tesla’s vehicle is not efficient. This so-called energy-efficient electric car works off electricity, yes, but that electricity comes from coal. How energy efficient is that? Why — not fix what is not broken? Oh, sorry I forgot …Biden and his banana republic know everything. Nothing but a bunch of commies and neo-cons in the Beltway.

    Liked by 3 people


Leave a comment