Why it is difficult to respect Europeans

Why it is difficult to respect Europeans    by Mustang.

Mustang who also spins some great tales at Fix Bayonets and Thoughts From Afar

Ah, the Europeans … who, bless their little pea-pick ‘in hearts, seem to solidify into but two classes of human beings. In the first, we find those who tired of the tyranny of so-called noble aristocracy and moved … dare I suggest it? … to America. In America, they became frontiersmen, soldiers, sailors, farmers, entrepreneurs, politicians, judges, engineers, teachers, factory workers, miners, doctors, restaurateurs, steelworkers, cabbies, and dry-goods merchants. They were folks who made substantial contributions to America’s growth —and it is for this reason that we should take great pride in their accomplishments. The European emigre is part of the story of America.

Conversely, in the second group, we discover those who elected to stay behind, to do as they were told —including permitting themselves to be drawn into two horrific world wars, who believed that republican democracy and civic virtue was much too difficult, and that getting free stuff at everyone else’s expense was a pretty neat idea, even at the expense of their own economic and philosophical emancipation —who today have evolved into the kind of human beings that would never in a million years question anything their respective governments tell them. Somehow, in the dynamic of social evolution, they convinced themselves that their lives must surely benefit all of mankind —even if that means standing idly by while foreign swine rape their women and pillage their communities. It truly is amazing.

But, if for today we are only considering the de-evolution of Germany, then we should recognize that this one country has had a robust relationship with Moslem countries since the late 19th Century when the Germans ruled over substantial Islamic populations.

In this relationship, the Germans sought to use Islam as a tool of control, even including the recognition of Sharia courts, Islamic endowments, support of madrasas, and recognition of Islamic holidays and festivals. In these days, German officials ruled their Islamic holdings through Moslem intermediaries, who in this way, gave legitimacy to German occupation. In 1898, during his visit to the tomb of Saladin, Wilhelm II declared Germany as a friend to the world’s (then) 300 million Islamacists.

Subsequently, Germany mobilized Moslems living in British, French, and Russian territories to aid them during World War I. Although Germany failed to spread Jihad in 1914, German strategists nevertheless maintained a strong interest in Islamic geopolitics. It was a strategy revisited by the Germans during World War II—including Eberhard von Stoher’s suggestion that Germany adopt an extensive Islam program. Such a program was in fact created in late 1941, and which enlisted the support and participation of the Mufti of Jerusalem, Amin al-Husayni. Germany regarded the Moslems as a source of authority that would legitimize their involvement in the Third Reich, and even justify Islamic violence toward non-German infidels. To cement this relationship, Germany instructed German soldiers to respect Islamic traditions. Moreover, the Germans made extensive use of religious policies, ordered the construction of mosques, prayer halls, and madrasas. Similar programs were established in the Balkans, and Moslems were continuously reminded that the Bolsheviks were mostly their hated enemy, the Jews. In the Crimea, General Erich von Manstein demanded that Islamists eradicate the Jewish-Bolshevik wherever they may be found. Both the Wehrmacht and SS regarded the Islamists as welcome allies.

In the Balkans in 1943, Manstein continually consulted with Islamic officials. For their part, the Moslems hoped that Germany would assist them in establishing an Islamic state in the region. Having intensified partisan hatred of Germany, the plan to co-opt Moslems backfired; violence escalated, resulting in the death of a quarter of a million Islamists.

The wholesale murder of Europe’s Gypsies involved Muslims directly. According to one first-hand account, “The gypsies arrived en masse on carriages at the Talmud-Thora Building. For some reason, they raised a green flag, the symbol of Islam, and put a mullah at the head of their procession. The gypsies tried to convince the Germans and Moslems that they were not gypsies; some claimed to be Tatars, others to be Turkmens. But their protests were disregarded and they were all exterminated.”

According to Professor David Motadel at the University of Edinburgh, Hitler lamented to Martin Bormann in the final months of the war that Germany’s efforts to fully mobilize the Moslems had failed because the Islamacists were not strong enough … and had the movement succeeded, “just think of what we could have done to help them, even to incite them, as would have been both our duty and our interest.”

History is interesting, is it not? It should lead us now to wonder what is going on within Angela Markel’s inner circles as it relates to massive and uninterrupted Moslem migrations to Germany.

B-Ville has added this video. It was done in 2009. Chilling.

Advertisements

U.S. FUNDS ISLAMIC TERRORISTS

Eyes on Britain – What happens with all the Muslim babies?

Eyes on Britain

By Mustang

A recent article in The Daily Mail warned British citizens that because of the ever-expanding number of births among Middle Eastern families, there won’t be enough room in public schools by the year 2022/2023.

According to the article by Eleanor Harding, almost half of the educational councils in England will not have enough secondary school places in five years’ time following a baby-boom fueled by migration.  Council leaders warn that more than 125,000 children face missing out on a secondary school seat by the 2022 school year unless “urgent action is taken.”  By urgent action, I assume that Eleanor is talking about massive increases in local taxes.

In England, the areas of Manchester, Leicester, and Islington in North London will be the worst hit by this crisis (areas with high populations of Moslems), which as it turns out already have more pupils than places for the coming year.  But the threat extends well beyond the high-immigrant areas of London.  The figures of the Local Government Association (LGA), using data supplied by the Department of Education, offer projections based on higher birth-rates among immigrant populations.  Even now, the gerbil-like procreation within Moslem populations has caused a strain on elementary schools.  Currently, twelve school councils will run out of places for students with an estimated number extending to 23 councils in the next school year.  Bottom line … a short-fall of 49% within 123 councils.  Eleanor tells us that “600,000 additional primary places will be required by the 2022/2023 school year.”

We could round this figure up to one-million just to simplify the argument.

I have long held the belief that you don’t change a tiger’s stripes simply by moving him from his natural habitat to a zoo in the midwestern United States.  Moslems do not give up their Islamic mandate of procreation simply because they’ve migrated to a western country.  Of course, I suppose we could presume that Moslems living in America (or anywhere else in the west) embrace monogamy, or that they are all honest folk who pay their fair share of state and local taxes (which support such things as local schools), but I suspect the opposite.  I do wonder how many Moslem women with children (in some societies, referred to as whores)  sired by polygynous men, draw public assistance as part of their “invasion of the infidel” program.  On the other hand, if there is anyone out there who thinks that migrated Moslems (or their descendants) now (suddenly) embrace monogamy, or western civics —I have a bridge for sale at a very good price.

Since the chickens seem to be coming home to roost, maybe Americans should take note of this situation.

What do you think?

How many in Congress are being blackmailed by IT Imran Awan?

Back in May, I posted many of these questions. Knowing what we know now, the questions seem even more pertinent. Are congress members being blackmailed by IT breach?

We learn that Schultz kept this fine fellow on the payroll up until the day after he was arrested this week. For some reason, this is not going to end well for a couple of Congressmen.

Then we had this:

Debbie Wasserman Schultz threaten’s Police Chief over hacking scandal, wants evidence returned to her 

Congressional technology aides are baffled that data-theft allegations against four former House IT workers — who were banned from the congressional network — have largely been ignored, and they fear the integrity of sensitive high-level information.

Five Capitol Hill technology aides told The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group that members of Congress have displayed an inexplicable and intense loyalty towards the suspects who police say victimized them. The baffled aides wonder if the suspects are blackmailing representatives based on the contents of their emails and files, to which they had full access.

“I don’t know what they have, but they have something on someone. It’s been months at this point” with no arrests, said Pat Sowers, who has managed IT for several House offices for 12 years. “Something is rotten in Denmark.

“There’s no question about it: If I was accused of a tenth of what these guys are accused of, they’d take me out in handcuffs that same day, and I’d never work again,” he said.

A House IT employee who requested anonymity said tech workers who have taken over some of those offices found that computers in some — but not all — offices were “thin clients” that sent all data to an offsite server in violation of House policies. Additionally, staffers’ iPhones were all linked to a single non-government iTunes account.

The investigation goes far beyond the theft of millions of dollars. The employees could read all emails dozens of members of Congress sent and received, as well as access any files members and their staff stored. Court records show the brothers ran a side business that owed $100,000 to an Iranian fugitive who has been tied to Hezbollah, and their stepmother says they often send money to Pakistan.

Read More Daily Caller

Donald Trump ends celebration of Ramadan dinner celebration

Finally Trump puts his foot down. We have been at war with Islam since the beginning of our Nation. Shades of what John Adams and Thomas Jefferson argued back at the time of the beginning of our Nation. Muslims were terrorizing our shipping lanes on what was known as the Barbary Coast. Capturing our sailors and ships. Appeasement? Or War? I include a small part of an earlier post of mine concerning it.

President Trump, who stayed over at the White House for the weekend, did not hold an iftar dinner to commemorate Ramadan. Instead, he issued a statement Saturday morning to celebrate the occasion, which marks the end of the holy month.

 

“On behalf of the American people,” President Trump said in the statement, “Melania and I send our warm greetings to Muslims as they celebrate Eid al-Fitr.”

Over the years, the dinners, attended by leaders of the Muslim community, foreign diplomats and members of Congress, have grown odd, given the nonstop Islamic violence spreading across the world. Ramadan brings even more terror as Muslim attackers are seen as martyrs during Ramadan, and supposedly win greater rewards in the afterlife.

And 2017 set a new record for terror attacks during Ramadan, which ran from May 26 to June 24. There were 174 Islamic terror attacks that left 1,595 people dead and 1,960 wounded, reports Religion of Peace.  H/T”Daily Wire

What Jefferson and Adams knew about Muslims that Progressives don’t

Adams wanted to pay ransom to secure the release of hostages. Jefferson said no more. Appeasement? Or war. It is good to review this piece of History at this time. Here tis a piece of it:

During the meeting Jefferson and Adams asked the Dey’s ambassador why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts.

The Americans wanted to negotiate a peace treaty based on Congress’ vote to appease. For the following 15 years, the American government paid the Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages. The payments in ransom and tribute amounted to 20 percent of United States government annual revenues in 1800.

Not long after Jefferson’s inauguration as president in 1801, he dispatched a group of frigates to defend American interests in the Mediterranean, and informed Congress.

Declaring that America was going to spend “millions for defense but not one cent for tribute,” Jefferson pressed the issue by deploying American Marines and many of America’s best warships to the Muslim Barbary Coast. Read more

 

Prime Minister May’s terrorism solution? Restrict the Internet

It would be one thing if control of the internet was focused on radical Islam converting others to mayhem and violence. But if history tells us anything, control of speech ends up as  the first step and the hallmark of moving toward a totalitarian State. So if you have concern that Prime Minister May might be a bad choice in the upcoming British election, check out my earlier post Could the British Labor Party Corbyn Win the British Election?  Here we go with the latest.

British Prime Minister Theresa May called for a bold measure after her nation suffered yet another deadly terror attack in the heart of London.

No, May did not call for reforming the United Kingdom’s immigration policies or shutting down known extremist mosques. She instead called for restricting the internet.

“We need to work with allied democratic governments to reach international agreements to regulate cyberspace to prevent the spread of extremist and terrorism planning,” May stated in her Sunday speech. She also declared that the “pluralistic values of Britain” must be established as “superior” to any other value set.

The UK already has a lengthy record for targeting so-called “Islamophobia” spread on the Internet. Back in 2013, the British government arrested several citizens in the middle of the night over their “racist” comments following a Muslim extremist decapitating British soldier Lee Rigby in broad daylight.

In February 2016, U.K. police arrested a Scottish man who was upset over the large number of refugees who were set to settle in his small town. A month later, authorities detained a London man for his apparently “Islamophobic” tweet in response to the Brussels terror attack.

And this is just the United Kingdom being discussed here. Pretty much every single Western European country is obsessed with silencing “hate speech” online and Germany has gone as far as to threaten to hit Facebook with a massive $53 million fine if the platform doesn’t comply with its demands to censor “offensive” views.

More at  Daily Caller

Free rides for refugees – Displacing Europe’s Population

I am not a fan of Info Wars in particular, but they often provide leads to information one would not find otherwise. Either way, one has to wonder why Europe is so worried about Russia when they are no less allowing the Trojan horse of millions of refugees into their midst which will ultimately doom themselves. There are Millions of Dollars in the business of taking care of refugees, so this is not so far fetched. Check out

   There’s money to made on these Syrian Refugees‏ 

Here we go with the latest from Moon Battery:

Combine the mass importation of “refugees” with Africa’s exploding population rate and you have effective genocide. If this continues, within a century Europeans will face a situation as grim as whites do now in South Africa. Another century after that and no one will even remember Europeans; the continent will be populated by savages squatting in dung huts.

If Russia invaded, Europe would fight back. But to be conquered by Russians would be infinitely better than to be displaced out of existence by uncountable hordes of Africans, because there would still be such a thing as the future.

More at Moonbattery

%d bloggers like this: