California prefers ‘free range rats’ over humans. Proposed poison ban


California is prepared to sacrifice human lives for the sake of wildlife apparently. The wise Progressives have let fester a growing health risk in allowing their rat population to explode with no interest in controlling their expanding population. The Democrats want to ban rat poison.

You can’t call them lazy. Once a female rat reproduces, she could have 15,000 descendants by the end of just one year!

NOTE: Your rat mileage may vary. For this model we are assuming rats become fertile after 9 weeks and proceed to have litters of 11 pups every 11 weeks. SOURCES: National GeographicIllinois Department of Public Health

Bloom is pushing for a new state law that would ban what is being called “second generation” rat and rodent poisons. The reason there are second generation poisons are the rats — the bane of anyone who has had rid their homes of them — have essentially developed immunity to rat poisons that worked for years.

So apparently the worry isn’t over parent’s having their kids bitten, or preventing California cities having middle-age diseases develop and spread.

Typhus is already well on it’s way in creating a serious health problem.

Typhus is supposed to be rare today because of our successful efforts to keep rodent populations in check and implementing sanitary living conditions. Like the bubonic plague, typhus is a nasty and painful disease that can be an effective killer as it has led to epidemics and pandemics. It killed more of Napoleon’s soldiers in his hasty 1812 retreat from Moscow than the Russians did. During World War I it was blamed for 3 million deaths in Russia plus hundreds of thousands in Poland and Romania.

The worry is over animals that so called “predatory species such as raptors, bobcats and foxes consume the poisoned rats.

 The analysis says that data is “less conclusive in pointing to (rat poisons) as the specific cause of death in necropsied animals.”

Freely translated, there is no clear scientific evidence that rat poison are killing hawks, bobcats and other predators.

In the end, what are a few human lives worth in comparing the joy of having “free range” rats.

I could point out that time is on the rats side. The longer it takes before addressing the homeless issue and not maintaining adequate sanitary conditions the more poison at some point will have to be used. All that needs to happen is one of them becomes rabid. Better yet after we have the Bubonic plague? Typhus and a host of medieval diseases descend?

If we are counting on our good friend the cat taking care of business in the rat department count again. Here is what is happening in Baltimore.

Read more

Other than that, all is well in the swamp. Thanks to  Doug Ross  for the link and welcome readers. Thanks as well to WhatfingerNews for the link. Welcome readers from Pirate’s Cove
For the best in conservative news and so much better than Drudge, click below.

Does Hillary Clinton have Kidney Disease?

News Alert has a headline

Has Hillary Had A Cankle Sized History of Health Problems?.

That is the total story with a pic-


Let me posit a theory. One of the questions with those of us who have a minimum amount of a medical background is why is Hillary Clinton taking an older anti-clotting blood thinner drug Coumadin which is essentially rat poison as opposed to the newer blood thinners that don’t require as much monitoring, with constant blood levels required. Coumadin has a shorter half life, thus does not remain in one’s system as long is the major difference. She certainly has access to the latest medical advice. I scouted around with possible drug interactions with anti-seizure medications as one thought. Nothing there. One thing that did stick out was that if one had kidney disease the newer drugs appeared to be contraindicated. So, I spin that out for your consideration.

What is up with Hillary Clinton’s mental health?

Adrienne’s Corner gives us this information on what the heck is going on with the Hildebeast? Or is she “sick” or “Insane”? It is weird to say the least. So here is what Adrienne has to say on the matter:
Lately, Hillary has been caught on camera doing some very strange things.  At first I just thought it was another of her weird ways of interacting with people, but now I’m not so sure.

In the video below, Paul Joseph Watson is going to mention the possibility of her having a Jacksonian seizure.  Having never heard of this type of seizure, I looked it up:

Q: What is a “Jacksonian” seizure?

A. Jacksonian march, also called Jacksonian seizure, is one kind of a simple partial seizure. “Simple” in this context means patients do not lose awareness. Partial means that abnormal neuron firing only occurs in part of the brain, and, accordingly, abnormal movement or sensation is limited to only part of the body. The characteristic features of Jacksonian march are (1) it only occurs on one side of the body; (2) it progresses in a predictable pattern from twitching or a tingling sensation or weakness in a finger, a big toe or the corner of the mouth, thenmarches over a few seconds to the entire hand, foot or facial muscles.

Try and imagine this woman sitting in the oval office and then tell me all the reasons you won’t for Trump. 

Then we have this one.


Credit Scores impacting Obamacare approval and price UPDATE

UPDATE: Apparently the story is incorrect. It was created by Channel Six T.V. in Orlando. This should be a lesson to us. A so-called Navigator got this so wrong and giving out this info? What else are they telling people. Drudge and the Weekly Standard carried the story as well, so it seemed to be well vetted. If you haven’t caught the Sibelius –  Jon Stewart “interview” it is located at the bottom of the page.

Lead health care navigator in Florida provides wrong information on credit scores

Ann Packham tells Local 6 she was incorrect about Affordable Care Act

After receiving numerous emails about the story, Local 6 contacted Packham on Wednesday, and she said her statement was incorrect, adding that users do not need their credit scores to apply for the Affordable Care Act.

Local 6 is investigating how the person in charge of providing information about the Affordable Care Act could make such an error.

Meanwhile, the government website continued to be bogged down on Tuesday, oftentimes showing users a message saying, “We have a lot of visitors on the site.”

The link is at the bottom of the post. In case you haven’t had the pleasure of watching Sibelius make a A** of herself, I include this as well. Yep, Obamacare moving right along


Many people signing up for health care in Florida through the Affordable Care Act have been shocked when they have to give proof of their credit score before they finish the process.

Anne Packham, one of many people licensed by the state to help people navigate the government’s website, said on Tuesday that the credit check occurs so providers can make an educated decision about who to insure.

“If someone is defaulting on all of their bills they may not want to have them as part of their health plan,” said Packham, the lead Navigator in Florida.

Participants with low credit scores could end up paying higher premiums, according to Packham, who said that ultimately the insurance company makes the call.

H/T:  Video of the story over at: Click Orlando

Now on to Kathy:

For someone who’s been highly critical of Republicans opposed to Obamacare, Jon Stewart was really adamant in pressing Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius about issues he has with the health care bill, from the website bugs to the one-year business delay that individuals didn’t get. He repeatedly pressed that last point and got noticeably frustrated at the lack of a clear response.

Bloomberg to restrict Pain Killers at Hospitals

While laying fallow these many days with who knows what illness, I looked forward to my returning debut as a blogger, healthy enough to be able to find some news that may have gone under the radar. So here we go. A story that sums up all that we are fighting for. The government loses its senses, and morphs into a dictatorship. Here is a prime example why we must not allow, cannot allow any form of restriction on our guns, and Ammo. Yes Ammo. Let me get to the point. If a non-physician can dictate the amount of pain medication one can receive, just think what we have in store for gun control, Obamacare, any of our freedoms. So I give you Mr. Bloomberg, who heralded the banished Big Gulp, now moving on to pain medication.

“The city hospitals we control,” he said Friday in
response to critics, “so … we’re going to do it and we’re urging all of
the other hospitals to do it, voluntary guidelines. Somebody
said, oh, somebody wrote, ‘Oh then maybe there won’t be enough
painkillers for the poor who use the emergency rooms as their primary
care doctor.’

According to Bloomberg, the over prescribing of
painkillers has led to a rise in violent crimes as well, as no-goods
have been hanging around pharmacies to ambush patients.

“You see there’s a lot more hold-ups of pharmacies, people getting held up as
they walk out of pharmacies. What are they all about? They’re not trying
to steal your shaving cream or toothpaste at the point of a gun. They
want these drugs.”

Of course, the city could allow people to carry
guns to defend themselves, but that would be too easy and would allow
people to be responsible for themselves.

Much better to ban medicine. Besides, where’s the fun of electing a liberal mayor if you
can’t leave sick people writhing in agony? Soda Head

Mayor Michael Bloomberg is a total control freak. NYT reports:

Some of the most common and most powerful prescription painkillers on the market will be restricted sharply in the emergency rooms at New York City’s 11 public hospitals, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg said Thursday in an effort to crack down on what he called a citywide and national epidemic of prescription drug abuse.

Bunkerville: God, Guns, Guts Comrades

“You all will be blessed”

doctor chicago 1_45073The White House is desperate. Sending Michelle out to promote Obamacare.  After her history of ‘patient dumping’?  But then again she did decide she’s now a ‘proud american’

This is a move they didn’t want to make; they wanted to keep Michelle out of the policy spotlight to avoid the negatives that Hillary racked up. The fact they’re deploying her tells you they’re down to betting their shoes and wedding rings.

First the children (Chip), now his  woman… is Obamacare a sinking ship?

Might as well put her to work.  Her day today: Michelle Obama goes to market; uses 36 vehicles to shop for insanely overpriced “organic” food a block away.  Will Charlie Gibson report??

~ Comrade Matrix

%d bloggers like this: