Feinstein and Rosenstein’s 300 Prosecutors work to find dirt on Kavanaugh

 

Apparently this last bit of “Show and Tell” from Diane Feinstein isn’t going anywhere or is it? We hear her latest info is being turned over to the White House. Of course it is. Let’s make it look like the Trump outfit is hiding something. Is this the last dud to be lobbed?

If so, it wasn’t for the lack of trying.

 

 

The New York Times reported:

 Rod J. Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, has asked federal prosecutors to help review the government documents of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, according to a letter obtained by The New York Times on Wednesday.

Mr. Rosenstein’s request was an unusual insertion of politics into federal law enforcement. While the Justice Department has helped work on previous Supreme Court nominations, department lawyers in Washington typically carry out that task, not prosecutors who pursue criminal investigations nationwide.

But in an email sent this week to the nation’s 93 United States attorneys, Mr. Rosenstein asked each office to provide up to three federal prosecutors “who can make this important project a priority for the next several weeks.” Names were to be submitted to Mr. Rosenstein’s office by the end of Wednesday.

For more see earlier post:

AG Rosenstein asks Federal Prosecutors to ‘help’ with Kavanaugh paperwork!! WTH!

 

Now the latest on the Feinstein do over:

The FBI is declining to investigate Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s connection to a Democratic senator’s mysterious claim that troubling ‘information’ had come to her – information reportedly concerning sexual misconduct when he was in high school.

The New York Times reported Thursday that Feinstein received a letter about the unspecified allegations against Kavanaugh ‘this summer’ – meaning she may have held onto it for dramatic effect at an inopportune moment for Republicans.

Debra Katz, a Washington, D.C. lawyer best known for representing women who make ‘#MeToo’-style accusations against powerful men, is reportedly representing the unnamed woman. Katz was seen leaving Capitol Hill on Wednesday night.

Feinstein is the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, which is considering Kavanaugh’s nomination.  Republicans are pushing to confirm him to the Supreme Court by Oct. 1, when its next term begins.

A tight-lipped Feinstein had released a cryptic statement saying that the woman who provided the information about Kavanaugh ‘strongly requested confidentiality, declined to come forward or press the matter further, and I have honored that decision.’ More at the

Daily Mail

Former Feinstein Staffer Raised $50 Million, Hired Fusion GPS And Christopher Steele After 2016 Election

 

What does Feinstein know, and who is putting pressure on her? Nothing would be better for her to call it a day as a Senator. Let’s connect the dots with what she did back in January 2018 when she released the 312 page GPS Fusion Report. She claimed that she felt “pressure.”

A declassified congressional report confirms prior reporting by The Federalist that Daniel Jones, a former staffer for Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), hired Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele after the 2016 election to push the anti-Trump Russian collusion narrative.

According to the report, Jones, who runs an investigative outfit called the Penn Quarter Group (PQG), told the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in March of 2017 that he had retained the services of Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele to “continue exposing Russian interference” in the 2016 election. Steele is the former British spy who authored the infamous unverified dossier of allegations against President Donald Trump.

The congressional report stated that Jones “planned to share the information he obtained with policymakers on Capitol Hill and with the press, and also offered to provide PQG’s entire holdings to the FBI.” That information was gleaned from an FBI interview document called an FD-302, which was prepared on March 28, 2017. Feinstein’s office did not respond to multiple requests for comment about her interactions with Jones during the course of her committee’s investigation of Fusion GPS prior to the publication of this article.More at  The Federalist

Connecting the dots:

Feinstein says she felt “pressure” to release transcript 

Sen. Dianne Feinstein made a startling admission when asked why she released the Fusion GPS transcripts on Tuesday without first informing Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) ahead of time.

“I meant to tell him, and I didn’t have a chance to tell him, and that concerns me,” Feinstein told CNN Congressional correspondent Manu Raju, adding “I just got pressured, and I didn’t do it.

 

 

Clinton Ally Feinstein can’t Name a Single Senate Accomplishment

I have news for Feinstein. While Dianne can’t come up with anything Hillary accomplished while a New York Senator, Hillary can’t come up with any of her accomplishments as Secretary of State. In the clip I dug up, take note that she takes full responsibility for the Foreign policy of the Administration, claiming Obama was “too busy” working on the economy. Here we go:

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D., Calif.) struggled to name a single accomplishment from Hillary Clinton’s nearly decade-long tenure in the Senate when prompted by reporters.

Feinstein, who endorsed Clinton’s 2016 presidential run, worked alongside the former secretary of state in Congress for eight years. When pressed to name a “signature accomplishment” from Clinton’s time as senator, Feinstein drew a blank.

“Golly, I forget what bills she’s been part of or authored,” Feinstein told The San Francisco Chronicle earlier this week.

Feinstein met with The Chronicle’s editorial board Tuesday to outline her latest California water plan and told reporters the question about her longtime ally caught her off guard. She later directed an aide to “get on Google” so she could keep a list of Clinton’s senate successes.

(During her eight years in Congress, three bills that Clinton sponsored became law. The statutes were noncontroversial and established a historic site, a post office, and highway in New York.)

More Free Beacon

At the Women of the World 2014 Summit in New York City on April 3, 2014, Hillary Clinton struggles to list concrete accomplishments during her tenure as Secretary of State.

Just who are journalists and will be protected in the future? Diane Feinstein knows.

Oh, we knew this was coming didn’t we? Control the internet, and more importantly, control the blogosphere. The best part is that in the end Eric Holder and the DOJ will be the determiner of just who is a journalist in case there is any question. Let us not let this assault get away from us while we are distracted on so many fronts.

The US Senate attempted to define who is and is not a journalist. In the process of passing a “Shield Law” to protect journalists and their sources, a fiery debate ensued over just who is a journalist and who deserves the shield law protection.

Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) was adamant to only extend the protection to “real reporters” and not, she said, a 17-year-old with his own website.

“I can’t support it if everyone who has a blog has a special privilege … or if Edward Snowden were to sit down and write this stuff, he would have a privilege. I’m not going to go there.”

Matt Drudge, a man who redefined journalism at the dawn of the new media, and continues to lead the industry in traffic and influence, took to Twitter to defend bloggers and to hammer the senator.

And Drudge is speaking from personal experience. There was a time when the political and media establishment targeted him as “Public Enemy #1” and his groundbreaking work was derided as the end of journalism.  Drudge tweets that even a federal judge attempted to define his work as non-journalism. Video of the Feinstein hearing over at : Breitbart

Notes from the video clip below:

Senators Diane Feinstein & Schumer have proposed legislation that would “define” journalist as some one who works for a ‘real’ journalism organization, ie: ABC, CNN, FOX, NY Times etc etc. Thereby excluding any alternative media, bloggers or citizen journalists. Plain & simple, you would have to be government approved in order to report and NOT face criminal charges for whatever the government deemed as NOT being journalism or news. THE GOVERNMENT WISHES NOW TO CONTROL THE MEDIA & SILENCE dissent. To report anything the government does not deem as news could land you in jail.

Feinstein: ‘I can’t remember how many DUI’s one can have’ and still be legalized

The exact quote: “I can’t remember how many DUI’s somebody can have’ and still be legalized under immigration bill.

There are plenty of blogs that have reviewed the nasty business inside the immigration bill that just passed its first hurdle. Instead, I bring you this summary from our gal Feinstein who really has not a clue what she voted on because….drum roll please…… “my mind is filled with intelligence right now,” so let us rush this sucker through as fast as possible because we all need to get out-of-town before… well, you fill in the blanks. Video of her over at CNS News. Hint: No one has read the bill.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)  said on Tuesday she “can’t remember” how many DUIs an illegal alien can have and still be made a legal resident of the United States under the immigration reform bill being considered this week in the Senate.

At the Capitol, CNSNews.com asked Feinstein, “Under the Corker-Hoeven amendment last night, the immigration bill, how many DUIs can an illegal alien have before becoming legalized?” Feinstein was one of 52 Democrats who voted for the amended bill. “Well, I can’t answer that right now. I just don’t know,” Feinstein replied. “Have you read the bill, the amended parts?” she was asked. “I’m on the Judiciary Committee. I sat through all the hearings and my mind is filled with intelligence right now, and candidly I can’t remember how many DUIs somebody can have, but hopefully it isn’t many.” “Two is what is…” “I was going to say, one or two.” Feinstein interjected. –

In fact, even after the inclusion of the Corker-Hoeven amendment on Monday, the Senate bill will allow an illegal who has two DUI convictions to be granted legal status in the United States and put on a path to citizenship. (See pages 251-253)

H/T:CNS News.. video over at the link.

Diane Feinstein and Chuck Schumer pack guns -none for us

Amazing isn’t it. The hypocrisy. Feinstein in 1995 on her concealed carry permit: ‘I know the urge to arm yourself because that’s what I did’ Video below. More on her at MRC TV

She states:

“I know the sense of helplessness that people feel. I know the urge to arm yourself because that’s what I did. I was trained in firearms. I walked to the hospital when my husband was sick. I carried a concealed weapon and I made the determination if somebody was going to try and take me out, I was going to take them with me.”

 Not only does Schumer carry a handgun, the New York City Police Department also provides armed escorts for the good senator. In fact, the Government Accounting Office — the investigative arm of the US Congress — slammed Schumer’s use of police resources for personal protection. It’s clear that Schumer believes he’s special. He wishes to ban private citizens’ ownership of firearms, while he enjoys layers of protection.

And then we have Senator Diane Feinstein on the Left Coast who possesses something more rare than a conservative Republican in San Francisco – an unrestricted concealed weapons permit. Apparently without shame, she participated in a citywide gun turn-in program that was intended to create some kind of statue from the donated guns that were to be melted down. One of her police body guards let it slip that she contributed a cheap model for the meltdown, while retaining her .357 magnum revolver for her own personal self-defense.

Hypocrisy is not limited to politicians when it comes to the Second Amendment. For Example, well-known Washington-based columnist, Carl Rowan, often wrote about the ills of firearms ownership. Until, that is, he shot and wounded a teenager who trespassed on his property. The white teenaged boy claimed he wanted to try Rowan’s swimming pool. Rowan, an African-American, retaliated with deadly force using a firearm. That’s when the news came out that Carl Rowan, gun-control advocate, actually possessed a license to own firearms. H/T:Federal Observer

Brazen Boxer, Feinstein reverse, Now Want Water for California Farmers

So which is it Boxer and Feinstein? You were opposed to water September 23rd, 2009. The Democrats opposed legislation the Republicans offered, and you voted down giving water to the San Joaquin Valley in favor of the Smelt. Reverse: Now in favor. All for Obamacare and getting two more votes. Sorry Smelt, you lost to Obamacare and our corrupt goverment. What could not be done by a vote is now done by a dictatorship. And that is what we have.

NOW:

The U.S. Department of Interior announced yesterday that it is increasing water allocations for the Central Valley of California, a region that depends on these water allocations to support local agriculture and jobs. The region has recently been starved for water and as a result unemployment has soared. Not surprisingly, Cardoza and Costa had a hand in the announcement:

“Typically, Reclamation would release the March allocation update around March 22nd, but moved up the announcement at the urging of Senators Feinstein and Boxer, and Congressmen Costa and Cardoza.“(“Interior Announces Increased Water Supply Allocations in California,” U.S. Department of Interior news release, 3/16/10)

BEFORE:

Feinstein & Boxer Vote Against Water for California Farms.   September 23rd, 2009 • Richard Cochrane

On the Senate floor, a clearly unhappy Feinstein likened the surprise amendment to Pearl Harbor and she voiced dismay that it would be brought up without her prior knowledge.

DeMint’s long-shot amendment to a Fiscal 2010 Interior Department funding bill would have effectively restored full irrigation deliveries for a year to what is being referred to as a new Death Valley. The 400 miles San Joaquin Valley is a fertile strip of farm land that produces more fruits and vegetables per square foot than any comparable land in the nation – when it has water, which it does not.

 With hundreds of thousands of Californians out of work, food prices rising rapidly and California’s  farmers both its U. S. Senate an amendment that was billed as a way to help solve the San Joaquin Valley’s water problems.

By a nearly party line 61-36 vote, the Democratic-controlled Senate rejected the amendment offered by Republican Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina. http://richardcochrane.hypocrisy.com/2009/09/23/feinstein-boxer-vote-against-water-for-california-farms/

NOW PRESENT DAY:

The president’s health care reforms are on the ropes and the San Joaquin Valley’s two blue-dog Democratic congressmen Dennis Cardoza and Jim Costa have been reluctant to support the president’s reforms. So imagine everyone’s surprise when the Department of the Interior announced yesterday that it is dramatically increasing the water supply to the valley’s parched lands. And what a coincidence, now the two California congressmen who were once “undecided” are being moved over into the “yes” column:

As a vote approaches on Obama and Pelosi’s government takeover of healthcare, Code Red is now considering two supposedly “undecided” California Democrats, Dennis Cardoza and Jim Costa, to now be “yes” votes. 

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/04/30/the-dust-bowl-congress-created/

Sen. Feinstein: Whether Osama bin Laden Should be Read Miranda Rights is a ‘Murky Area’

She said Americans should trust the judgment of Attorney General Eric Holder who, unlike his predecessors, is“not blemished in any way.”

Would U.S. troops have to read Osama bin Laden his Miranda rights if and when they capture him? It’s a “murky area,” Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.) told CNSNews.com.

http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=57582

Here is the deal, Feinstein, Eric Holder’s former Law Firm represents at last count 17 of the detainee’s. Indeed, he is “Blemished”. In fact at the last Senate Hearing, when he was requested to give the to Senators the names of those who worked in his office and who had worked for the detainees previously at his law firm, he indicated he would have to “consider it”.

 Under U.S. law, a person who is arrested or placed in legal custody must be told his Miranda rights

%d bloggers like this: