Bloomberg latest – ‘Farmers are dumb’ and death panels are good’

 

Michael Bloomberg sure knows how to increase his number of his potential constituents. So we already know how he feels about pregnant women… actually women in general. Sunday he tells us let’s kill off the “elderly.”  Bring in the death panels. His stop and frisk policies and Blacks in general. Whose left?

Let’s go after the “low information” voter. The one’s with the low sloping foreheads. He refers to it as a “gray matter issue.” You know, the ones we count on feeding us and making things. Let’s turn them off too. These remarks should make Trump’s deplorables just swing his way.

 

But we already knew that.

Bloomberg: Government Should Import ‘an Awful Lot More’ Immigrants

Democratic 2020 candidate Michael Bloomberg says he will recruit “an awful lot more” immigrants “to take all the different kinds of jobs” in the U.S. economy.

The immigrants can “improve our culture, our cuisine, our religion, our dialogue, and certainly improve our economy,” Bloomberg told reporters without naming the American cultures, cuisines, religions, and dialogues that would be improved.

“We need an awful lot more immigrants rather than less,” Bloomberg told reporters after he filed the paperwork needed to join the Democratic Party’s primary in Arizona:

 

Let us not forget the AARP crowd. You know, the ones most likely to come out to vote. Death panels are a real sell.

 

 

Mike Bloomberg: All of these costs keep going up. Nobody wants to pay anymore money. And at the rate we’re going healthcare is going to bankrupt us. So not only do we have a problem we’ve got to sit here and say which things we’re going to do and which things we’re not. Nobody wants to do that. If you show up with prostrate cancer and you’re 95 years old, we should say go and enjoy, you’ve had a long life, there’s no cure and we can’t do anything. If you’re a young person, we should do something about it. Society’s not willing to do that, yet.”

Spoken like a true heartless socialist.
How horrible.

Justify your existence George Bernard Shaw

 

 

Foreign policy? Doesn’t get much better either.

Let’s make sure we have it down about his China policy……after all Bloomberg makes his billions selling us out to them.

 

Just for hoots and giggles….. let’s end this on a happy note.

 

Thats all folks. A roundup of the latest deep swamp creature to rise.

Other than that, all is well.

 

British star faces jail for eugenics comment, Obamacare supports it

Juxtapose these two stories. The first being that of a British TV star who could be jailed because a “Down” baby squeaked by and was born, thus avoiding abortion, and should be “put down” against a Jonathan Gruber clip who testifies in support of the Obamacare “Death Panels” and abortion. He terms it “positive selection.” Here we go:

A BBC reality TV star could be jailed for posting on Facebook that children born with Down’s Syndrome should be ‘put down’.

Ursula Presgrave – who appeared on BBC3’s The Call Centre – was taken to court after saying disabled children should be killed instead of living the ‘pointless life of a vegetable’.

The 23-year-old pleaded guilty to an offence under the Malicious Communications act and now faces a maximum sentence of six months in jail or a £5,000 fine.

Presgrave, who was known on the BBC show for her tattoos, piercings and foul language, told Facebook followers: ‘Anyone born with down syndrome should be put down, it’s just cruel to let them lead a pointless life of a vegetable.’

The call centre worker, who appeared alongside Nev Wilshire in the BBC Three fly-on-the-wall series, was arrested after police also found photos joking about the disabled on her phone, Swansea Magistrates’ Court heard. Keep Reading…

Here is a previous post Obamacare Gruber: ‘Abortion of marginal children’ a ‘social good’ UPDATE 

Embattled MIT professor Jonathan Gruber has not only gotten in trouble for bragging about helping President Obama put one over on the American people with Obamacare, he’s also been uncovered as an abortion advocate—but not a run-of-the-mill advocate of “women’s rights.”

No, Gruber’s abortion advocacy is of a particularly pungent eugenics variety. He’s on record repeatedly making the case from social science that abortion is a “social good” because it reduces the number of “marginal children,” by which he means urban poor—those he says can be counted on to commit crimes if they were ever born.

Gruber co-authored a paper during the Clinton years which argued that legal abortion had saved the U.S. taxpayer upwards of $14 billion in welfare benefits and that it also lowered crime.

Keep reading…

You want your Doctor? Just pay for it says Dr. Emanuel

There is no one who should be despised more than Ezekiel Emanuel M.D. Now that he is being trotted out with his venomous talk, I can only hope soon someone from the press will ask him about the death panels. Yes, he is the very one who wrote the panel into existence. I urge everyone to read his article that appeared in the prestigious journal Lancet. The man simply has no moral compass and he needs to be called out.

Please check out the “Complete Lives System” espoused by Rahm Emanuel’s Physcian brother and Berwick to understand how the rationing will occur. “ Principles for Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources” by Ezekiel Emanuel. Lancet Article. Rahm Emanuel’s brother. You will not sleep well tonight

ObamaCare Architect Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel told Chris Wallace on FOX News Sunday today,
“If you like your doctor you can pay more.”

That isn’t what Barack Obama promised. Obama told the American public – “You can keep your doctor – period.” But that wasn’t true either. TIME Magazine, not exactly a conservative operation, reported:

“Many people are going to find out that the second part of the promise — that if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor — just wasn’t true,” says Gail Wilensky, who directed the federal Medicare and Medicaid programs under President George H.W. Bush. Factcheck.org labeled the promise “misleading,” noting that while the law doesn’t contain provisions designed to force people to pick new doctors, a switch may be inevitable for some. “The President simply can’t make this promise to anyone,” the site wrote.

H/T:Gateway Pundit

Obamacare bad now? Death panels start next year

Here come the death panels. Do we have to wait until we have to prove once again that they lie?  That the panels do really exist? Why is this not reported? Forget the website, that is not what is going to kill us. Forget delaying the bill which the Rino’s will be more than happy to help out the Dems. Fix this!

IBD reports:

The most troubling provision in ObamaCare’s Section 1311 gives the secretary of health and human services blanket authority to control how doctors and hospitals treat patients. All in the name of improving “quality.” That could mean everything in medicine, such as when your OB/GYN should do a Caesarean.

What that means for you is that if you enroll in an exchange plan, with or without getting a subsidy, your care will be standardized by the federal government with an eye to reducing what you consume and how much it costs.

Your doctor may have to choose between doing what’s right for you and avoiding a penalty. Exchange plans can pay only those doctors who obey whatever regulations the Secretary imposes.

Yet the President claims that people losing their health plans and having to sign up on the exchanges will be getting a better deal. Losing your doctor, shopping blind for a health plan, settling for Medicaid-level care and government controls, all for a premium 41% higher than before and with a deductible that’s doubled? More at IBD
H/T:News Alert

Belgium Eyes Child Euthanasia – How far behind are we?

While one can be quick to be appalled when reading what Belgium has in store for children, recall that we are not so far behind with our DHHS Sibelius. Just connecting a few dots for those who still think Obamacare is going to be swell.

Recall this? Kidney Patients told to accept death, forgo Dialysis –  Asking Kidney Patients to Forgo a Free Lifeline

As they calmly say:

“It was meant to keep young and middle-aged people alive and productive, many of the patients who take advantage of the law are old…

One idea, promoted by leading specialists, is to change the way doctors refer to the decision to forgo dialysis. Instead of saying that a patient is withdrawing from dialysis or agreeing not to start it, these specialists say the patient has chosen “medical management without dialysis”.  ”That is the preferred term,”

Obama said

We will change the way we pay for health care – not by procedure or the number of days spent in a hospital, but with new incentives for doctors and hospitals to prevent injuries and improve results. . . . If we’re wrong, and Medicare costs rise faster than we expect, this approach will give the independent commission (Death Panels) the authority to make additional savings by further improving Medicare.”

Sebelius:

says it isn’t her place to pick and choose transplant recipients— The plight of a dying 10-year-old girl in urgent need of a lung transplant has  been taken up by some GOP lawmakers, and it’s shining a light on what critics  say is a questionable policy that puts children further down the waiting list. Read more: Politico

BRUSSELS — Since euthanasia was legalized in Belgium in 2002, Belgians have been euthanized for blindness, depression, anorexia nervosa, and a botched sex change operation.

Now, Belgians want to allow euthanasia for children.

Under legislation currently being debated in the Belgian Parliament, terminally ill or suffering children under 18 could be euthanized if they request it, their parents consent to it, and an expert deems the child capable of understanding their decision.

The bill is widely supported and is expected to become law.

Euthanasia is now considered medical therapy in Belgium.

Not only do two-thirds of Belgians favor the new euthanasia bill, but in a controversial poll, three-quarters said it would be okay for parents to euthanize their sick children without the child’s consent.

“The child does not have the maturity to get married or to buy alcohol or to buy cigarettes if he is 14. Now we are saying that because he is suffering, he might have the possibility to ask for euthanasia,” Carine Boucher, with the European Center for Bio-ethics in Brussels, said.

More at CBN News

Paul Krugman: ‘Death panels and Sales Tax’ are how we fix things

So the esteemed Paul Krugman, ad nauseam defined as the “Nobel winning economist” lest we forget for one moment his proclaimed bona fides, just as our Dear Leader, had these fine remarks. A view from his elevated stance, on us poor wretched beings, whose lives may need to be shortened so that the Progressives can complete their agenda.  But this is not the first time he said it, but it was buried before. Now they are actually coming out and calling it exactly as Sarah Palin described it. The desensitization continues. Here we go with the latest:

Paul Krugman spoke at Sixth & I Historic Synagogue in Washington, D.C. last week. During the Q&A session following the lecture, an audience member asked him about the rising national debt. in a moment of brutal honesty, the esteemed Princeton professor revealed his long term prognosis. According to the professor,

Eventually we do have a problem. That the population is getting older, health care costs are rising…there is this question of how we’re going to pay for the programs. The year 2025, the year 2030, something is going to have to give…. …. We’re going to need more revenue…Surely it will require some sort of middle class taxes as well.. We won’t be able to pay for the kind of government the society will want without some increase in taxes… on the middle class, maybe a value added tax…And we’re also going to have to make decisions about health care, doc pay for health care that has no demonstrated medical benefits . So the snarky version…which I shouldn’t even say because it will get me in trouble is death panels and sales taxes is how we do this H/T:. breibart

 Earlier, April, 2011 NY Times Paul Krugman cheers inclusion of death panels in Obama’s Budget Plan

The main thing, though, is the strengthened role of and target for the Independent Payment Advisory Board. This can sound like hocus-pocus — but it’s not. You have people who actually know about health care and health costs setting priorities for spending, within a budget; in effect, you have an institutional setup which forces Medicare to find ways to say no.

Recall our earlier post: Kidney Patients being told to accept death and forgo dialysis

”It was meant to keep young and middle-aged people alive and productive. Instead, many of the patients who take advantage of the law are old and have other medical problems”. Take advantage?

RedState, April, 2011:

 I noticed that he took full ownership of death panels yesterday. Naturally, Obama did not call them death panels. He called them “an independent commission of doctors, nurses, medical experts and consumers.” But his description hits dead on with what his death panels will do.

According to Barack Obama yesterday, the death panels “will look at all the evidence and recommend the best ways to reduce unnecessary spending while protecting access to the services seniors need.”

Earlier, Reich portends the future Reich reveals the schocking truth about Obamacare:

This is a recording of Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich, speaking at the University of California, Berkley on September 26th, 2007. He explains what national healthcare (like Obamacare) will mean for the country. Note the laughter of the students.

 

Belgium to legalize ‘accelerated deaths’ for minors and Alzheimer’s Pts.

Isn’t socialism swell? Anyone still think that the 15 member non-physcican panel that is part of Obamacare that is to decide the quality and quantity of our lives still not coming our way? As Sarah so rightly called it, Death Panels. History repeats itself. France is on board as well.

France should allow doctors to “accelerate the coming of death” for terminally ill patients, a report to President Francois Hollande recommended Tuesday.

Hollande referred the report to a national council on medical ethics which will examine the precise circumstances under which such steps could be authorised with a view to producing draft legislation by June 2013.

“The existing legislation does not meet the legitimate concerns expressed by people who are gravely and incurably ill,” Hollande said. France 24

Belgium is considering a significant change to its decade-old euthanasia law that would allow minors and Alzheimer’s sufferers to seek permission to die. Just how do these patients seek permision? Just asking.

The proposed changes to the law were submitted to parliament Tuesday by the Socialist party and are likely to be approved by other parties, although no date has yet been put forward for a parliamentary debate.

“The idea is to update the law to take better account of dramatic situations and extremely harrowing cases we must find a response to,” party leader Thierry Giet said.

He said parliamentarians would also consider extended mercy-killing to people suffering from Alzheiner’s-type illnesses.

Euthanasia was allowed to an Alzheimer’s patient for the first time in the Netherlands last year. France 24

Reich reveals the schocking truth about Obamacare:

This is a recording of Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich, speaking at the University of California, Berkley on September 26th, 2007. He explains what national healthcare (like Obamacare) will mean for the country. Note the laughter of the students.

 

 
Jane asks the President if her 100 year old mother (now 105) would have gotten a pacemaker under his plan. Well now that’s a tough one … that costs a lot and maybe we will have to say, just take a pill. Priceless.

Averill Harriman’s Mother Financed Eugenics Movement

I caught this when trolling for something to post that would be a bit “uplifting” when I came upon this. Why am I posting this? To remind ourselves what these fine folks have in mind for the world. What with their “Meatless Mondays”, Obamacare with their so called “board” to decide what care we get and how much, and other matters of redistribution, keep one thing in mind. They are the masters, we are the recipients of their plan. November’s election will determine our fate. Who was Averill Harriman?

“Now our textbooks tell us that the Nazis and Soviets were bitter enemies and their systems are opposites,” observed Professor Sutton.  But in the “1920s, W. Averell Harriman was a prime supporter of the Soviets with finance and diplomatic assistance … [and] participated in RUSKOMBANK,” which was “the first Soviet commercial bank.  Furthermore, Max May, the Vice President of Guaranty Trust, which was dominated by Harriman and Morgan, became the first Vice-President of Ruskombank.”  However, declared Professor Sutton, “Averell Harriman, his brother Roland Harriman, and … E.S. James and Knight Woolley, through the Union Bank … were prime financial backers of Hitler.”  He asked, “How could a rational man support Soviets and Nazis at the same time?”

From The Hidden Evil

Flashback:
Averill Harriman’s Mother Financed Eugenics Putting the KKK to Shame
  H/T: News Alert Here is her Obituary:

For us of the Eugenics Office the things that counted
most were her understanding of the needs of the work at a time when it was
 ridiculed by many and disesteemed by many others. As she often said the fact
 that she was brought up among well bred race horses helped her to appreciate the
importance of a project to study heredity and good breeding in man. Though she
could turn a deaf ear to many appeals to the emotions, she had a lively sympathy
for those things of whose lasting value she felt sure; the civic training of
 boys in the city, recreation out of doors for the masses, development of
forests, improvement of transportation facilities, aid to artists, to medicine,
to State care of defectives, to the improvement of the human race. The things
that impressed one most in Mrs. Harriman’s personality were her charming
 enthusiasm, her keen sympathies, her incisev[sic] intelligence and her devotion
to fundamental research. Her gifts to eugenics research have [obscured] have
ensured the further development of that subject on a high plane, not only in
this society but over the whole world.

Mrs. Harriman Mrs. Edward Henry Harriman, nee Mary Williamson Averell, founder
of the Eugenics Record Office and inspirer of its initial work, died on November
8, 1932. She was born at Rochester, N.Y. July 22, 1851 the daughter of W. J.
Averell. Of her management of the huge estate that fell into her keeping on the
death of her husband it is not for us to speak here. She was devoted in the
administration of her trusteeship and saw to it that what she regarded as the
family fortune was not to be dissipated by lavish gifts and the establishment of
foundations. She continued to support those philanthropies in which Mr. Harriman
had been interested, she did much to promote safety in railroading, she gave
10,000 acres of land to the State of New York to create the Harriman Park,
endowed a chair of forestry at Yale and gave to the Carnegie Institution of
Washington the plant and farm of the Eugenics Record Office, together with a
“dot” of $300,000 in cash.

Eulogy on death of Mrs. Harriman

British Health System kills 130,000 Elderly people a year

A recent editorial in the British Medical Journal recommends dehydrating dementia patients to death to save money.

The revelations are not new, as NHS has long been a focus of criticism from pro-life advocates for euthanasia and rationing medical care or basic needs like food and water.

A May 2011 story in the Daily Mail showed how patients were being starved and dehydrated to death.

Anyone still wondering if we are going to have Death Panels? If anyone thinks that a dehydration and food denied death is a pleasant one, think again. Any life that is denied food and water suffers. Under the guise of doing no harm, they might just as well shoot old folks by firing squad. That is what I suggest if they wish to carry out these untimely deaths. First they will say the patients are demented. After them, they come for us. See, it keeps getting easier, the call to do it, is not as difficult.

Pullicino admitted patients are too quickly put on the pathway who need basic medical treatment and have long lifespans ahead of them. He said he personally intervened to take a patient off the LCP who went on to be successfully treated and told the paper it is “palpably false” that all patients subjected to euthanasia have a grim medical prognosis.

In the example he revealed a 71-year-old who was admitted to hospital suffering from pneumonia and epilepsy was put on the LCP by a covering doctor on a weekend shift.

Professor Pullicino said he had returned to work after a weekend to find the patient unresponsive and his family upset because they had not agreed to place him on the LCP.

‘I removed the patient from the LCP despite significant resistance,’ he said.

‘His seizures came under control and four weeks later he was discharged home to his family,’ he said.

Lifesite News reported:

The courts should not interfere with doctors who want to dehydrate to death incapacitated patients who are a drain on scarce financial resources, according to an editorial in this week’s edition of the prestigious British Medical Journal.

Raanan Gillon, emeritus professor of medical ethics and former chairman of the Institute of Medical Ethics governing body, wrote that a ruling last year by the High Court against dehydrating an incapacitated patient to death was “profoundly disturbing” because it took the life and death decision-making power out of the hands of doctors and required that the principle of the “sanctity of life” take precedence over other considerations. More from Thoughts from a Conservative Mom

H/T: Gateway Pundit

Reich reveals the schocking truth about Obamacare

The Democrats have known all along that the plan was an  “early exit” for us and our loved ones. The destruction of innovation that moves and extends our life span. Before Obama was even elected, before Obamacare was even on the radar, Reich told the Berkley students what the plan was. And the students? Listen to them applaud at throwing Grandma off the cliff. They have been taught well haven’t they?

This is a recording of Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich, speaking at the University of California, Berkley on September 26th, 2007. He explains what national healthcare (like Obamacare) will mean for the country.

Bottom line: The insiders know that the young will get screwed by Obamacare, that life expectancy will go down under Obamacare and that medical innovation will suffocate.

Here Obama says maybe its better to take a pain pill.

Jane asks the President if her 100 year old mother (now 105) would have gotten a pacemaker under his plan. Well now that’s a tough one … that costs a lot and maybe we will have to say, just take a pill. Priceless.

 

This is what our children are being taught in our colleges. 

%d bloggers like this: