Wall Street Whistleblower: Clinton Foundation is the ‘Largest Charitable Fraud in American History’

 

This is not a new story, but one we shouldn’t let slip by. B-Ville has been on it:

Clinton Foundation slush fund – less than 15 percent goes to charitable grants

 

What really was happening with the Russia “reset” starting in 2009? Large contributions to political campaigns come with strings attached.

Evidence already in the public domain shows that certain Russians found common cause with green investors, as Peter Schweizer’s work for the Government Accountability Institute explained in “From Russia with Money: Hillary Clinton, the Russian Reset, and Cronyism.” […]

To the consternation of many, the U.S. announced in September 2009 that it would abandon plans to provide a missile defense shield to Poland and other Eastern Europe nations. […]

Starting in July 2016, the Dallas office of the IRS finally began an investigation into Clinton Foundation public filings, prodded by Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) and other congressional Republicans.

Missing disclosures concerning donations from foreign governments, and other glaring discrepancies, should have been resolved and should have triggered payment of substantial fines, penalties, and interest to government treasuries long ago.

In case you are interested lest we forget:

(RELATED: Clinton Foundation Deceived IRS On Tax Exemption From The Start)

Doug Band reveals Clinton Foundation Inc ‘For Profit’ activity  

Clinton Foundation affiliated charities failed to file financial information 

Clinton Foundation refiling its tax returns, look for other ‘errors 

Haitian President ‘Clinton tried to bribe me,’ reveals the Clinton Foundation  

FBI US Attorney investigation underway of Clinton Foundation 

Clinton Foundation placed on charity ‘Watch list’ 

Clinton Foundation spends only 15 percent giving grants 

Advertisements

Clintons and their ‘love’ for Haiti -Hillary calls out Trump’s remarks? NYC Protests!

 

Falling victim to one of the various bugs, I found myself laying fallow. In an effort to distract myself, I turned on the T.V. and ended up watching a psychotic press roll out Trump’s so-called victims of his latest snapshot view America’s immigration policies. Trump’s premise was that America could become the very sh*t hole similar to much of Africa and our neighbors to the South if our borders are not secure and immigration was not based on merit. Seemed simple enough. Having suffered the slings and arrows of Hillary during the campaign— a deplorable and irredeemable human being– I just wasn’t prepared to take it on the chin again. Right now, it is impossible to even turn on the news.. but as I bid adieu to the topic, let us not forget Clinton’s and their race relations. Specifically Haiti. I include a terrific clip that exposes the Clintons for the criminals they are. Funny, none of this is getting reported.

Here is something that gives me some piece of mind:

Protesters gathered outside the Clinton Foundation in New York City to complain about “missing money” from the Haiti recovery effort from the 2010 earthquake:

“New Yorkers with roots in Haiti say the picture [of the Haiti recovery] isn’t so rosy,” said the NY1 anchor.

The protesters claimed that the $10 billion meant to help rebuild Haiti did little to help the country after the devastating quake. And that much of the money went to non-Haitian companies.

“[I]n Harlem, people raised their voices to call attention to the missing money,” said the local New York City reporter. “This protest outside the offices of the Clinton Foundation, which helped lead the reconstruction fund.”

Said one protester, “These people, they are still living in very difficult conditions, still living under tents, while Bill Clinton and his cronies–they waste this money.”

Read more at theWeekly Standard

Former President of Haiti exposes the corruption of the Clintons. The You tube notes have a summary of his remarks.

Some of my earlier efforts:

Haitian President ‘Clinton tried to bribe me,’ reveals the Clinton Foundation

Memo: Clinton would steer State funds to her Donor’s Haiti project

Clinton Foundation slush fund – less than 15 percent goes to charitable grants

Let’s just have a little refresher today. Before Hilary starts her next spin of all of the “good works” of the Clinton foundation, take a look at reality.When you hear about all the AIDS drugs given out in Africa and other marvelous endeavors, know that charity begins at home.  I will give you a few of my links to the Foundation posts. Yep. Just 5.7 percent in 2014 went to charitable grants. Later year report got it to 15 percent. Here are the earliest years below. The other point?

For Hillary, Charity begins with the Clinton Foundation 

A number of Clinton Foundation Board of Directors charged or convicted of crime 

In fact, the Clinton Foundation is so unlike a real charity that even charity watchdog group Charity Navigator refuses to rate the Clinton Foundation because of its “atypical business model.”

One of those problems is the fact that the Clintons put big donors and close pals on the board for reasons that are hard to fathom. In fact, at least four of these “board members” have either been charged or convicted of serious financial irregularities, crimes including bribery and fraud.

So if Jeff Sessions can tear himself away from the gang bangers, I am willing to give him just a few more links so he can “catch up” on the Foundation news. Next time, the Clinton Global Initiative. Back to my post:

Just 5.7 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s massive 2014 budget actually went to charitable grants, according to the tax-exempt organization’s IRS filings. The rest went to salaries and employee benefits, fundraising and “other expenses.”

The Clinton Foundation spent a hair under $91.3 million in 2014, the organization’s IRS filings show. But less than $5.2 million of that went to charitable grants.

That number pales in comparison to the $34.8 million the foundation spent on salaries,

compensation and employee benefits.

Another $50.4 million was marked as “other expenses,” while the remaining almost $851K was marked as “professional fundraising expenses.”Daily Caller

(RELATED: Clinton Foundation Deceived IRS On Tax Exemption From The Start)

Doug Band reveals Clinton Foundation Inc ‘For Profit’ activity  

Clinton Foundation affiliated charities failed to file financial information 

Clinton Foundation refiling its tax returns, look for other ‘errors 

Haitian President ‘Clinton tried to bribe me,’ reveals the Clinton Foundation  

FBI US Attorney investigation underway of Clinton Foundation 

Clinton Foundation placed on charity ‘Watch list’ 

Clinton Foundation spends only 15 percent giving grants 

Clinton’s Laureate Education Company – latest scam to hit the news, Execs quit

This latest Clinton reveal is sure to be a headliner in the days to come. I first posted about this back in 2016 as one of the greatest money laundering scams that preyed on the unsuspecting and helped make the Clinton rich. This past February, having plundered as much as they could, it was dreamed up to start an IPO trying to extort even more via the stock market. All of the top executives have quit- within a few months of the IPO. They apparently know more, much more than what has been revealed. The Daily Caller writes a wandering piece, so I have included my earlier post as well. It’s Columbus Day, so if you have a few extra minutes do read the latest update as this reveals in glorious ways just what sociopaths the Clinton’s are:

Top Executives Ditch Clinton’s Laureate Education Company  reads the headline. Top executives at a company with ties to former President Bill Clinton called Laureate Education are leaving the firm only months after they launched its IPO.

The Baltimore-based company became an issue during the 2016 presidential election campaign when the public learned it paid Clinton nearly $18 million over a period of five years to serve as a consultant and “honorary chancellor.”

The firm also faced accusations it operated as a “pay-to-play” company by donating between $1 to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation while receiving hundreds of millions of dollars in government funds.Laureate Education has been closely entwined with the Clintons and the Clinton Foundation. In addition to $17.6 million the company paid to Bill Clinton and its donations to the foundation, both the foundation and Laureate have held joint programs. More at  Daily Caller  with latest info

From my previous post: The Clinton’s get rich off of promoting world’s largest for-profit Universit  

While the media is quick to attack Trump and his rebuttal outrage regarding Trump University, Bill Clinton and thus his little lady Hillary as well are getting rich on Bill’s being paid and promoting the world’s largest for-profit University with sharp business practices,…. well, I’m getting ahead of myself. You read the fine points from American Thinker: (Update at the Daily Caller link at end of post)

As accusations swirl around Donald Trump for the complaints filed against Trump University, few people know about how Bill Clinton was hired in 2010 to be Chancellor for the Laureate Network, the world’s largest for-profit university network.

Not just Bill Clinton but other Clinton friends from the past were hired to promote the university.  Investors in the vast multinational university include Henry Kravis, George Soros, Steve Cohen and Paul Allen.  One of the investors in Laureate University, SAC Capital Advisors LP, is a hedge fund that had to pay a $1.2 billion dollar settlement to the US Dept. of Justice to settle allegations of insider trading.

One student named Larissa Da Silva complains that when she enrolled in IBMR, a Brazilian branch of Laureate, the admissions officer promised her a 30 percent discount on tuition.  Two years later the deal evaporated and her monthly tuition cost jumped to 791 reais.  She summarized the change of policy by stating “I feel completely deceived.”  Apparently the fine print states that grants and tuition discounts may be temporary, so it’s her fault for not lawyering up before she enrolled in the Clinton-promoted college.

Bill Clinton has personally been paid to make appearances promoting Laureate University in countries such as Malaysia, Peru and Spain.  By January 2014 Laureate University had 800,000 students worldwide and its annual revenue was $4 billion, far larger than the revenues of Trump University.

Laureate has taken over struggling colleges by using high-pressure marketing tactics such as “turbocharging enrollment” using students as telemarketers.  Laureate University was investigated by the Rio State Legislature’s Investigative Commission on Private Universities in Brazil.   Robson Leite, a Rio state legislator who led the probe concluded:  “They have turned education into a commodity that focuses more on profit than knowledge”

What voters may soon realize is that every time the media attack Donald Trump for something, it turns out that the Clintons were involved first, to a far greater extent.  This also proves what Trump has been saying; that the media are very dishonest and focus only on him.

Read more: American Thinker

Hillary Clinton has Mueller transfer Uranium to Russia on a tarmac

What is it with the relationship with Mueller and Hillary Clinton? I would want to ask Mueller what was he doing out on a tarmac transferring Uranium to Russia? What is it with Uranium Russia and Clinton? What is it with tarmacs?

But possible even more shocking is the fact that the State Department wanted the transfer of the HEU to take place on an “airport tarmac” which is rather reminisce of the infamous Loretta Lynch/Bill Clinton meeting which occurred on a Phoenix, Arizona, tarmac back in June of 2016.

(INTELLIHUB) — Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton facilitated the transfer a highly enriched uranium (HEU) previously confiscated by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) during a 2006 “nuclear smuggling sting operation involving one Russian national and several Georgian accomplices,” a newly leaked classified cable shows.

The secret “action request,” dated Aug. 17, 2009, was sent out by Secretary of State Clinton and was addressed to the United States Ambassador to Georgia Embassy Tbilisi, the Russian Embassy, and Ambassador John Beyrle. It proposed that FBI Director Robert Mueller be the one that personally conduct the transfer a 10-gram sample of HEU to Russian law enforcement sources during a secret “plane-side” meeting on a “tarmac” in the early fall of 2009.

Paragraph number 6 of the leaked cable confirms Dir. Mueller’s Sept. 21 flight to Moscow.

“(S/Rel Russia) Action request: Embassy Moscow is requested to alert at the highest appropriate level the Russian Federation that FBI Director Mueller plans to deliver the HEU sample once he arrives to Moscow on September 21. Post is requested to convey information in paragraph 5 with regard to chain of custody, and to request details on Russian Federation’s plan for picking up the material. Embassy is also requested to reconfirm the April 16 understanding from the FSB verbally that we will have no problem with the Russian Ministry of Aviation concerning Mueller’s September 21 flight clearance.”

Past dealings with the Russians were also mentioned in the cable, signifying that previous deals have taken place.

As Peter comments:

If I were a liberal wacko I would take from this story the following: Well this helps make sense of Trump’s collusion with the Russians. Ten years before he defeats Hillary she meets Trump’s Russian friends clandestinely on a tarmac as a favor to him. And now Mueller who is secretly Donald’s uranium co-conspirator will pretend to investigate him. Let’s draw up those letters of impeachment in Maxine Water’s office.

Clinton Foundation probe continues in NY FBI office

This was a pleasant piece of information. Nothing could please me more than having the Clinton’s corruption exposed. Especially since they are so self-absorbed they are still trying to do what they can to disrupt the transition of government. One would think they would want to stay under the radar considering all of their nefarious behavior but apparently no. I especially would like to see Huma taken down a notch. Here we go:

comeyOfficials at FBI headquarters instructed its New York field office to continue its corruption investigation into the Clinton Foundation following the election of Republican candidate Donald Trump, according to a former senior law enforcement official.

The instructions ordered agents to “go forward” with their ongoing inquiry into the Clinton Foundation which is focusing on issues of corruption and money laundering, according to the source.

“There were no instructions to shut it down, to discontinue or to stand down on the investigation, but to continue its work,” the former official told the Daily Caller News Foundation in an interview.

The same source broke the news to The DCNF that the FBI was conducting a multi-city probe of the foundation in as many as five cities: New York, Little Rock, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles and Miami. The source did not know the status of the bureau’s work in the four other cities.

More at the Daily Caller

Podesta and the Clintons up to their eyeballs in Russian money

Now that John Podesta has become center stage in the latest drops from wiki Leaks, knowing what we now know about him, I thought I would give you a repeat of an earlier post. While the Clinton machine keeps spinning that Trump is in bed with the Russians rather it it they who are up to their eyeballs. Including one John Podesta. Here it is:

What is becoming apparent is that there are few connected with the Clinton money machine who are not enjoying the fruits of the Clintons. This story tells us how John Podesta made out collecting big bucks with Russia while no doubt selling our technology down the drain. But the Clintons are well-known for a penchant for selling out technology. Bill loved to do deals with China, looks like Hillary and her cohorts look toward Russia. First this, and then on to Podesta. We have this gem:

A Moscow-based technology initiative funded in part by the Russian government funneled tens of millions of dollars into the Clinton Foundation while Hillary Clinton was serving as secretary of state, according to a new report released Monday.

As President Obama’s top diplomat, Clinton oversaw and facilitated the State Department’s failed five-year project to “reset” U.S.-Russia relations, which spurred the creation of Skolkovo, a research facility known as Russia’s version of Silicon Valley,Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer wrote in a new report, titled “From Russia with Money.”

But I digressed:

A bombshell report released Sunday by the non-partisan Government Accountability Institute (GAI) revealed that John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, developed undisclosed relationships with a Putin-connected Russian government fund.

Podesta served on the executive board of an energy company called Joule Unlimited, which received $35 million from a Kremlin-connected entity.

Podesta was on the executive board of an energy company which received $35 million from a Kremlin-connected entity.

The energy company was part of a “Russian reset” program, which then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton helped initiate. The program was designed to build an “innovation city” called Skolkovo, a Russian equivalent to the U.S.’s Silicon Valley. Critics of the initiative, including the FBI, warned that the Russian government would use Skolkovo to gain access to technology and information that would help build up their military.

The GAI report says “Two months after Podesta joined the board, Vladimir Putin’s Rusnano announced that it would invest up to 1 billion rubles into Joule Unlimited, which amounts to $35 million. That represents one-fifth of the entire amount of investment dollars Joule collected from 2007 to 2013.”

Rusnano is a government-owned joint-stock company that was founded by Vladimir Putin in 2007.

It is unclear why Podesta failed to disclose reveal his membership on the board of one of the Joule entities, even though it was required by law. The revelation of Podesta’s secret relationship with Kremlin-connected entities, however, only raises more questions about the transparency and trustworthiness of the Clinton campaign — and casts into doubt the Democratic effort to paint Clinton’s opponent as too cozy with Russia.
More at Lifezette

%d bloggers like this: