Smart meters to control your home has started

One more way of controlling us. Stop, and it must stop now. Who are these people? Best keep your Laptop battery charged up. Great way to control the Internet. Just a quick refresher before the story, note that Fannie Mae owns the patent for Cap and Trade exchange. Why? This whole thing is so corrupt one does not know where to start.

Then Barbara Hollingsworth of the Washington Examiner reports on April 20 that Fannie Mae owns patent on residential ‘cap and trade’ exchange!

Homeowners from coast to coast are growing upset over the “smart meter” devices that utilities are foisting on them by the millions, with the full backing of the administration. The meters are being marketed as energy savers enabling consumers to select a level of power usage and cost that best suits their needs. “We can imagine the day when you’ll be able to charge the battery on your plug-in hybrid car at night, because your smart meter reminded you that nighttime electricity is cheapest,” President Obama said in an October 2009 speech

Rand Paul:

Despite the decades of rhetoric about “keeping government out of the bedroom,” the left wants Uncle Sam in every wall socket. It wants to deny you the ability to choose lighting, toilets, washing machines and dishwashers that work. Now they want to restrict even the ability to use these diminished devices. It’s time to pull the plug on mandatory smart meters.

Mr. Obama has used stimulus funds to push the technology, such as a $20 million grant to Reliant Energy for device deployment in the Houston area.

On the one hand, the administration is agitated over “cybersecurity.” On the other, it is creating a network that would allow malefactors to shut down air conditioners in the midst of a scorching summer day. Those malefactors might even work for the government. Obama energy czar Carol Browner told U.S. News & World Report last year, “We need to make sure that … eventually we can get to a system where an electric company will be able to hold back some of the power so that maybe your air conditioner won’t operate at its peak.”

Read the whole thing : Washington Times

Marxist Energy Czar Carol Browner to leave White House

Carol Browner

Carol Browner

Obama’s Climate Change Czar leaving the White House. One Marxist gone. So many more to go. The hearings are gearing up by the Republicans..did they get cold feet about this Czar? Republicans introduce bill to eliminate Czars and Czarinas

From our post back in August White House potential for climate change we find this:

WHO IS CAROL BROWNER: In 2006 Browner and her husband, Tom Downey, (and Patriot Bill Clinton lets not foget) lobbied on behalf of Dubai Ports World, a United Arab Emirate-owned company, in its quest to take operational control of six major U.S. ports. They met with New York Senator Charles Schumer in an effort to minimize congressional opposition to the deal. Ultimately the deal fell apart.[4]

For a Complete Background From the Washington Times: Obama Climate Czar Has Socialist Ties

Carol M. Browner, President-elect Barack Obama’s pick as global warming czar, was listed as one of 14 leaders of a socialist group’s Commission for a Sustainable World Society, which calls for “global governance” and says rich countries must shrink their economies to address climate change.

Browner also served as a “commissioner” of the Socialist International (SI), the umbrella group for 170 “social democratic, socialist and labor parties” in 55 countries. SI’s “organizing document” cites capitalism as the cause of “devastating crises,” “mass unemployment,” ”imperialist expansion,” and “colonial exploitation” worldwide. Browner worked on SI’s Commission for a Sustainable World Society, which contends that “the developed world must reduce consumption and commit to binding and punitive limits on greenhouse gas emissions.”
Here is the rest of her Bio: Read more here

She lost! Browner had said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that President Barack Obama is still committed to pushing the bill through the Senate, and that there was “potential” for the bill to come up in a post-election, lame-duck session of Congress. .

Read more at Politico#

White House: ‘Potential’ for climate change in lame-duck Session

Carol Browner

Carol Browner

These folks have no shame…tone deaf?… no, it has gotton past that. Either way, by fiat via Executive Order, or whatever nefarious means they can contrive, the dictatorship marches on.  Democracy? Carol I am afraid does not know the meaning of the term. That’s ok- it just gins us up for November. 

Carol Browner, the White House’s top energy and environmental adviser, refused on Sunday to shut the door on passing climate change legislation this year — even though Senate Democratic leaders have conceded they lack the votes and have punted on the volatile issue. 

WHO IS CAROL BROWNER: In 2006 Browner and her husband, Tom Downey, (and Patriot Bill Clinton lets not foget) lobbied on behalf of Dubai Ports World, a United Arab Emirate-owned company, in its quest to take operational control of six major U.S. ports. They met with New York Senator Charles Schumer in an effort to minimize congressional opposition to the deal. Ultimately the deal fell apart.[4]

For a Complete Background From the Washington Times: Obama Climate Czar Has Socialist Ties

Browner also served as a “commissioner” of the Socialist International (SI), the umbrella group for 170 “social democratic, socialist and labor parties” in 55 countries. SI’s “organizing document” cites capitalism as the cause of “devastating crises,” “mass unemployment,” “imperialist expansion,” and “colonial exploitation” worldwide. Browner worked on SI’s Commission for a Sustainable World Society, which contends that “the developed world must reduce consumption and commit to binding and punitive limits on greenhouse gas emissions.”
Here is the rest of her Bio: Read more here

Browner said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that President Barack Obama is still committed to pushing the bill through the Senate, and that there was “potential” for the bill to come up in a post-election, lame-duck session of Congress. 

Browner’s remarks will almost certainly give ammunition to Republicans who say Democrats are plotting to do mischief in a lame-duck session — even though top congressional Democrats have thrown cold water on an overly ambitious lame-duck agenda. 

Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) later said on the same program that it’s “outrageous” for Democrats to consider passing the bill after the elections. 

Read more at Politico#

Robert Reich says goverment should take over BP

 

Was I the only one watching Meet the Press On Sunday? Carol Browner White House Energy Adviser said specifically that it was  Energy Secretary Chu, who called a halt to what BP was attempting- “Top Kill” -because the “Nobel prize” winner was worried maybe too much pressure in the line was building. I thought it was huge, but nary a word on the blogs. Hey, someone spring for a transcript and prove me a liar!!! And Communist Reich says we should take over BP? Looks like we have. Hey Zerro is in charge—from day one.

It’s time for the federal government to put BP under temporary receivership, which gives the government authority to take over BP’s operations in the Gulf of Mexico until the gusher is stopped. This is the only way the public know what’s going on, be confident enough resources are being put to stopping the gusher, ensure BP’s strategy is correct, know the government has enough clout to force BP to use a different one if necessary, and be sure the President is ultimately in charge.

If the government can take over giant global insurer AIG and the auto giant General Motors and replace their CEOs, in order to keep them financially solvent, it should be able to put BP’s north American operations into temporary receivership in order to stop one of the worst environmental disasters in U.S. history. http://robertreich.org/post/650145579/why-obama-should-put-bp-under-temporary-receivership

Congress Alarmed and Holding Hearings on Obama’s Czars

photofeature-obamaczars1

“President Obama’s decision to appoint so many czars is clearly troubling members of Congress, who have taken the unusual step of holding hearings on the issue. The decision of the two Senate committees is remarkable because a President’s management style is rarely questioned by the Senate or House during the first year of his term, especially when they are all members of the same political party. But, Obama’s decision to appoint almost 40 policy czars, and then give them broad powers and budgetary responsibilities, has created a more serious constitutional issue. ”

“The Senate is primarily concerned that President Obama may be end-running the Constitution, along with the growing fear, shared by many citizens, that the power and the extraordinary amount of funding that is controlled by the Czars may be undermining the authorities of the senate-confirmed agency heads on whom the Senate has placed its imprimatur and its trust.

Czars currently influence or directly control over a trillion dollars of government spending, which is more than the spending of the entire federal government during the Reagan Administration. And, yet, few of the Obama czars were ever vetted through the traditional review process where potential conflicts of interest are revealed. Nor are Obama’s czars accountable to the Senate to justify policy or spending decisions.

 

In addition, three issues concerning czars continue to perplex:”

cont’

http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/28/obamamerica-reign-of-the-czars/#at

%d bloggers like this: