Clintons Waco Slaughter April 19th, 1993 – 25th Anniversary

 

For today’s Saturday’s “whatever happened”  I will give you the 25th anniversary of the Waco slaughter this week.

On April 19, 1993, the F.B.I. finished off its siege of the Branch Davidians’ home just outside Waco, Texas, by pumping poisonous and flammable C.S. gas into a room filled with women and children, driving a tank through the wall, throwing incendiary devices at the survivors. Who and what started the fire has been in dispute.

Surly there was a better way than to slaughter men, women and children, more than 80. And the Clinton’s managed to get by without any MSM condemnation, blaming it all on his Attorney General who got by without a nick and later ran for Governor of Florida. Waco and Ruby Ridge are what were the sentinel moments in our nation’s conscience. A Government could turn on its people. The story of the shadowy figure called Hillary Clinton and her role in all of this is included.

 

 

 

 

 

The Waco siege was a siege of a compound belonging to the religious group Branch Davidians by American federal and Texas state law enforcement and military between February 28 and April 19, 1993. The group was suspected of weapons violations and a search and arrest warrant was obtained by the ATF. The incident began when the ATF attempted to raid the ranch. An intense gun battle erupted, resulting in the deaths of four agents and six Branch Davidians. Upon the ATF’s failure to raid the compound, a siege was initiated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the standoff lasting 51 days. Eventually, the FBI launched an assault and initiated a tear gas attack in an attempt to force the Branch Davidians out. During the attack, a fire engulfed Mount Carmel Center and 76 people.

According to Linda Tripp it was Hillary and not Bill Clinton who directed the final assault on Waco.

Mrs Clinton grew more and more impatient as the Waco stand-off came to dominate the headlines during the early months of the Clinton administration, said Bell. It was she, according to Bell’s sources, who pressured a reluctant Janet Reno to act.

“Give me a reason not to do this,” Reno is said to have begged aides shortly before orders were issued for the final assault.

During an interview in early February 2001 the former White House aide alleged that Hillary Clinton pressured the late Vincent Foster to resolve the Waco standoff. As a result more than eighty men, women and children were killed. Appearing on CNN’s “Larry King Live” Tripp suggested that Foster, at Mrs Clinton’s direction, transmitted the order to move on the Branch Davidian’s Waco compound, which culminated in a military style attack on the wooden building.

Her accusations lend weight to charges made previously by Special Forces expert and Waco investigator, Steve Barry. According to the former Special Forces member, Hillary set up a special “crises centre” in the White House to deal with Waco. Serving with her in the centre was Vincent Foster who, according to his widow was subsequently: “fuelled by horror at the carnage at Waco for which the White House had ultimately been responsible.”

Foster himself was found dead, from a gun-shot wound to the head, in a Virginia park three months later. Could he have known too much about Waco?

Journalist Ambrose Evans-Pritchard maintains that Foster had been “drafting a letter involving Waco” on the very day of his death. Moreover Evans-Pritchard says that Foster kept a Waco file in a locked cabinet that was off-limits to everyone, including his secretary.

Prior to Waco, Foster was “dignified, decent, caring, smart” says Linda Tripp; in its aftermath though, she said: “…Vince was falling apart.”

She was with the former White House deputy counsel when the news about Waco broke on television. “A special bulletin came on showing the atrocity at Waco and the children. And his face, his whole body slumped, and his face turned white, and he was absolutely crushed – knowing the part he had played.”

“And he had played the part at Mrs Clinton direction,” said Tripp.

Moreover there was a marked contrast between Foster’s heartfelt emotion at the Waco tragedy and Hillary Clinton’s, Tripp insists: “Her reaction was heartless”.

Her accusations give further weight to allegations first levelled in the 1999 documentary on the deadly confrontation, “Waco: A New Revelation.” The film featured the account of former House Waco investigator T. March Bell. “One of the interesting things that happens in an investigation is that you get anonymous phone calls,” Bell explained in the film. “And we in fact received anonymous phone calls from Justice Department managers and attorneys who believe that pressure was placed on Janet Reno by Webb Hubbel, pressure that came from the first lady of the United States.”

Mrs Clinton grew more and more impatient as the Waco stand-off came to dominate the headlines during the early months of the Clinton administration, said Bell. It was she, according to Bell’s sources, who pressured a reluctant Janet Reno to act.

“Give me a reason not to do this,” Reno is said to have begged aides shortly before orders were issued for the final assault.

A good History and the meaning and aftermath of this can be found at: Little Alex in Wonderland

written in 2010, this prescient statement is included for “whatever happened”:

It is again gauche to suggest that the U.S. government is a serious threat to our liberty. While the left at times appropriately condemned Bush’s warmaking, warrantless wiretapping, violations of habeas corpus and flouting of due process, the left has now become resigned to the precise policies being carried out by their hero Barack Obama. Just as important, they have forgotten what it meant to be more afraid of their government than of their fellow Americans upset about that government. All this Bush-era despotism continues unabated, but now it is seen as unseemly, unpatriotic, hateful, and even criminal to suggest that the U.S. government has authoritarian practices and totalitarian designs.

Advertisements

Bill Clinton admits to interfering in Israeli election – what is he doing over there?

 

Strange isn’t it? This little item never made it to the cables. Even more interesting, it is taking being more obnoxious for the Clintons to be relevant and to make a headline. First why is Bill over in the Middle East? Who is paying him? Or are the two of them going senile into the night? Of course, this just gives fodder to our distractors that the USA interferes in elections and governments. Note the Albania story out there now: US govt spent $9mn on Soros-backed political campaign in Albania …

Then again Obama was in it up to his eyeballs in interference as well.

The right in Israel has accused the U.S. — and in particular Democratic presidents — with interfering with local elections. The last time the finger was pointed was during the 2015 elections, when activists tied to the Obama administration were charged with trying to thwart another win for Netanyahu. The effort failed and Netanyahu kept the position he’s held since 2009.

Then again how about Russia?

Ted Kennedy asked Russians for election help, Bill Clinton mixed in the Russian election  bunkerville

In 1996 US govt interfered in Russia’s election so blatantly it was boasted of on the cover of Time magazine. . 

But back to the story at hand over at Breitbart:

TEL AVIV – Former president Bill Clinton confessed to Israeli television that he tried to help Shimon Peres defeat Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel’s 1996 general elections.

In an interview on Channel 10 news that aired Tuesday, Clinton admitted that he tried to help Peres win the election in a way that didn’t “overtly” implicate him, and that he did so because Peres was more committed than Netanyahu to the so-called peace process, which had suffered a huge blow with the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin six months earlier.

“I tried to do it in a way that didn’t overtly involve me,” he said, without expanding on exactly how he intervened.

Clintons and their ‘love’ for Haiti -Hillary calls out Trump’s remarks? NYC Protests!

 

Falling victim to one of the various bugs, I found myself laying fallow. In an effort to distract myself, I turned on the T.V. and ended up watching a psychotic press roll out Trump’s so-called victims of his latest snapshot view America’s immigration policies. Trump’s premise was that America could become the very sh*t hole similar to much of Africa and our neighbors to the South if our borders are not secure and immigration was not based on merit. Seemed simple enough. Having suffered the slings and arrows of Hillary during the campaign— a deplorable and irredeemable human being– I just wasn’t prepared to take it on the chin again. Right now, it is impossible to even turn on the news.. but as I bid adieu to the topic, let us not forget Clinton’s and their race relations. Specifically Haiti. I include a terrific clip that exposes the Clintons for the criminals they are. Funny, none of this is getting reported.

Here is something that gives me some piece of mind:

Protesters gathered outside the Clinton Foundation in New York City to complain about “missing money” from the Haiti recovery effort from the 2010 earthquake:

“New Yorkers with roots in Haiti say the picture [of the Haiti recovery] isn’t so rosy,” said the NY1 anchor.

The protesters claimed that the $10 billion meant to help rebuild Haiti did little to help the country after the devastating quake. And that much of the money went to non-Haitian companies.

“[I]n Harlem, people raised their voices to call attention to the missing money,” said the local New York City reporter. “This protest outside the offices of the Clinton Foundation, which helped lead the reconstruction fund.”

Said one protester, “These people, they are still living in very difficult conditions, still living under tents, while Bill Clinton and his cronies–they waste this money.”

Read more at theWeekly Standard

Former President of Haiti exposes the corruption of the Clintons. The You tube notes have a summary of his remarks.

Some of my earlier efforts:

Haitian President ‘Clinton tried to bribe me,’ reveals the Clinton Foundation

Memo: Clinton would steer State funds to her Donor’s Haiti project

Doctor mentioned in Wikileaks Clinton E-mail dead, stabs himself in the chest??

 

The death toll mounts for this years victims of knowing the Clintons. The police respond to a 911 call for an assault. Found dead with a self-inflicted knife. Sounds about right:

An acclaimed New York Trauma surgeon was found dead this week in his apartment.
Police said he stabbed himself in the chest.
They found him on his bathroom floor.
ABC News reported:

“An acclaimed trauma surgeon was found dead with a knife in his torso Sunday in his Park Avenue apartment in a suspected suicide, New York City police said.

Dr. Dean Lorich, 54, was the associate director of the orthopedic trauma service at the Hospital for Special Surgery who treated Bono in 2014 after the U2 frontman was badly injured in a cycling accident in Central Park.

Lorich was also a professor at Weill Cornell Medical College.”

His death is being investigated as an apparent suicide, a New York Police Department official told ABC News.

Initial investigations did not find any signs of forced entry at his apartment, the official said. Authorities have not found a suicide note.

Police responding to a 911 call of an assault in a Park Avenue apartment at 1:05 p.m. Sunday found Lorich unconscious and unresponsive with a knife in his torso, according to the NYPD. Emergency medical service responders pronounced him dead.

Dr. Lorich was mentioned in the Clinton Wikileaks emails for his work in Haiti.

 

Earlier this month Steve Mostyn, Democrat mega donor to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, died after “a sudden onset and battle with a mental health issue.”

In July
 former Haitian government Klaus Eberwein was found dead in a motel room from a gunshot wound to the head.

In August 15, 2016, anti Clinton author Scott Robert Makufka, better known as his penname Victor Thorn, was found dead. Thorn was the author of several anti-Clinton books over the years.

And that’s just the last year of Arkancides.

H/T:Gateway Pundit

Bill Clinton’s Multi-Million Dollar Communist Uranium Deal – Circa 2008

Note the date of the Post: Clinton’s Multi Million-Dollar Communist Uranium Deal  JANUARY 31, 2008. But we aren’t talking about Hillary, no, this Uranium thing started with Bill. And what do you know. The dirty cast of characters sound very familiar. One in the name of Frank Giustra.  In yesterday’s post Seven Facts to know about Uranium One – Hillary Clinton responds

  1. The Clinton Foundation Took Big Bucks from Uranium Investors
    According to theTimes, The Clinton Foundation received $2.35 million in donations from Ian Telfer, a mining investor who was also the chairman of Uranium One when Rosatom acquired it. It also received $31.3 million and a pledge for $100 million more from Frank Giustra, the Canadian mining financier whose company merged with Uranium One.

But I digressed. Keep your eyes open for Frank as I return to the chilling days of yesteryear:

Bill Clinton advocated for an oppressive communist leader known for human rights violations, corruption and election fraud to help a Vancouver businessman get uranium and, in return, the millionaire cut a hefty check to the former president’s foundation.

Clinton proudly used his clout to seal the sort of deal that would otherwise be impossible between an unknown uranium mining entrepreneur and the communist dictator of a former Soviet Republic (Kazakhstan), who happens to own one-fifth of the world’s uranium reserves.

With the help of his good buddy Clinton, Vancouver mining mogul Frank Giustra secured tens of millions of dollars worth of uranium to fuel nuclear reactors worldwide. The thank you note included a $31.3 million donation to the William J. Clinton Foundation as well as a future pledge of $100 million. (Seems like this is the going rate for Hillary as well.)

All Clinton had to do was endorse the election-rigging, communist human rights violator (Nursultan Nazarbayev) to head an international organization that monitors elections and supports democracy (Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe). The former president’s endorsement defied the U.S. government and even his senator wife, who had previously signed a State Department letter detailing Nazarbayev’s serious corruption, canceled elections and government control of the news media.

Yet Clinton flew to meet the Nazarbayev and actually congratulated him for opening up his country’s social and political life to help seal the uranium deal. Incidentally, Clinton lied to the American public when he took the 2005 trip to the former Soviet Republic, saying the visit was to announce a Clinton Foundation agreement with that country to buy discounted AIDS drugs.

The Clinton’s have helped many wealthy donors secure lucrative deals with foreign governments and their ties to the communist Chinese have been well documented. In the 1990s Clinton and his Democratic party accepted massive campaign contributions from the Chinese in exchange for highly secret missile technology and his administration sold coveted commerce department seats in exchange for donations.  H/T: Judicial Watch

Christopher Wilson digs a little deeper into the Canadian connection. He does a nice job of putting the pieces together.

I give you a tweet from yesterday:

Clinton Foundation slush fund – less than 15 percent goes to charitable grants

Let’s just have a little refresher today. Before Hilary starts her next spin of all of the “good works” of the Clinton foundation, take a look at reality.When you hear about all the AIDS drugs given out in Africa and other marvelous endeavors, know that charity begins at home.  I will give you a few of my links to the Foundation posts. Yep. Just 5.7 percent in 2014 went to charitable grants. Later year report got it to 15 percent. Here are the earliest years below. The other point?

For Hillary, Charity begins with the Clinton Foundation 

A number of Clinton Foundation Board of Directors charged or convicted of crime 

In fact, the Clinton Foundation is so unlike a real charity that even charity watchdog group Charity Navigator refuses to rate the Clinton Foundation because of its “atypical business model.”

One of those problems is the fact that the Clintons put big donors and close pals on the board for reasons that are hard to fathom. In fact, at least four of these “board members” have either been charged or convicted of serious financial irregularities, crimes including bribery and fraud.

So if Jeff Sessions can tear himself away from the gang bangers, I am willing to give him just a few more links so he can “catch up” on the Foundation news. Next time, the Clinton Global Initiative. Back to my post:

Just 5.7 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s massive 2014 budget actually went to charitable grants, according to the tax-exempt organization’s IRS filings. The rest went to salaries and employee benefits, fundraising and “other expenses.”

The Clinton Foundation spent a hair under $91.3 million in 2014, the organization’s IRS filings show. But less than $5.2 million of that went to charitable grants.

That number pales in comparison to the $34.8 million the foundation spent on salaries,

compensation and employee benefits.

Another $50.4 million was marked as “other expenses,” while the remaining almost $851K was marked as “professional fundraising expenses.”Daily Caller

(RELATED: Clinton Foundation Deceived IRS On Tax Exemption From The Start)

Doug Band reveals Clinton Foundation Inc ‘For Profit’ activity  

Clinton Foundation affiliated charities failed to file financial information 

Clinton Foundation refiling its tax returns, look for other ‘errors 

Haitian President ‘Clinton tried to bribe me,’ reveals the Clinton Foundation  

FBI US Attorney investigation underway of Clinton Foundation 

Clinton Foundation placed on charity ‘Watch list’ 

Clinton Foundation spends only 15 percent giving grants 

Ted Kennedy asked Russians for election help, Bill Clinton mixed in the Russian election

If the progressives want to know what actual treason looks like, they should consult liberal lion Ted Kennedy, who not only allegedly sent secret messages to the Soviets in the midst of the cold war, he also begged them to intervene in a U.S. presidential election in order to unseat President Ronald Reagan. They also should ask why Putin wants to get even for interfering in the Russian election.

That’s no exaggeration.According to Soviet documents unearthed in the early 1990’s, Kennedy literally asked the Soviets, avowed enemies of the U.S., to intervene on behalf of the Democratic party in the 1984 elections. Kennedy’s communist communique was so secret that it was not discovered until 1991, eight years after Kennedy had initiated his Soviet gambit:

Picking his way through the Soviet archives that Boris Yeltsin had just thrown open, in 1991 Tim Sebastian, a reporter for the London Times, came across an arresting memorandum. Composed in 1983 by Victor Chebrikov, the top man at the KGB, the memorandum was addressed to Yuri Andropov, the top man in the entire USSR. The subject: Sen. Edward Kennedy.

Kennedy would make certain the networks gave Andropov air time–and that they rigged the arrangement to look like honest journalism.

You can read the full KGB memo detailing Kennedy’s secret letter and request for electoral intervention here.

More The Federalist

Not enough of the Russians?

In 1996 US govt interfered in Russia’s election so blatantly it was boasted of on the cover of Time magazine. . 

Earlier I posted Bill Clinton meddled in Russian Election.

President Bill Clinton meddled in Russian affairs in the 1990s and helped Boris Yeltsin get elected to a second term, political analyst Dick Morris told Newsmax TV.

“I think that Putin resented that, hated it, thought that it was an inappropriate intervention by Bill Clinton and I think he’s determined to take his revenge out on Hillary Clinton.” Quote from Dick Morris.

%d bloggers like this: