Obama State Dept. Spent Tax Dollars To Translate Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” Abroad

 

Saul Alinsky

Saul Alinsky

What has become of the Congress investigation of James Comey? It seems to have fallen off the earth. Jeff Sessions is out there apparently with little if any interest. Sad when Congress has to nudge Sessions in supporting the Trumpster. Even more interesting was this tidbit that came out  regarding our former Marxist President. If Trump is being charged with Russian interference, how about Obama trying to stir up other countries elections?

“Congressman Steve King released the following video of statements he made during Judiciary Committee debate of legislation requiring the Attorney General to provide copies of any document, record, audio recording, memo, correspondence, or other communication that refers or relates to a number of troubling aspects of James Comey’s tenure as FBI director.”

During his statement made on July 27th, King revealed the State Department under former President Obama gave millions to George Soros-controlled organizations that dedicated part of its funds to translate Saul Alinksy’s ‘Rules for Radicals’ in Macedonian for the purpose of influencing Macedonia’s elections.

 

Congress King speaks on 7/26/17 in support of legislation that requires the Attorney General to turn over documents about former F.B.I. director James Comey’s involvement in several controversial cases. The legislation passed 16-13. King voted in favor of it. Apparently that was the end of that. Mr McConnell? Mr. Ryan? Where are we with this?

 

REP. STEVE KING:

“I just came back not that long ago from the Balkans, where I sat in a place like Macedonia and there I learned that the United States government borrowing money from China and Saudi Arabia had handed over at least $5 millions in contracts transferred through U.S. Aid ID into George Soros organizations that were used to manipulate elections in the Balkans, and that’s just particularly Macedonia – not including the neighboring countries that are there. 

And some of that money was used to translate Saul Alinsky’s ‘Rules for Radicals’ into Macedonian to distribute the book and the ‘Rules for Radicals’ and actions of radicals were manifested in the election efforts in that part of the world.”  T

What is the book ‘Rules for Radicals’? Steel on Steel explains:

The main goal of Alinskyites is to cause social instability through subversive and divisive rhetoric. One method is to control the outcome of the education system by lowering the standards of education so that it creates a dependent class. As adherents to the Cloward-Piven strategy, they use their political platforms to overload a society with social spending programs and class warfare to the point that hatred and division cause social panic. Once they’ve created a problem, they propose themselves as the answer and use wealth transfers and the trumping of rights as the method to bring about “equality”.

More at  Gateway Pundit

Advertisements

Hillary Clinton and her Alinksky Letters – just another Community organizer to be

Do we want another Community Organizer in the White House? That is exactly what we will get with Hillary Clinton. You haven’t had enough of her failed foreign policies? Why we are struggling not to have a landslide election this November? By now it should have been sewed up.. According to the polls, we are very close to losing several seats that we must win. Here we go.

Clinton’s connection to Alinsky has been the subject of speculation for decades. It became controversial when Wellsley College, by request of the Clinton White House, sealed her 1968 thesis from the public for years. Conservative lawyer Barbara Olson said Clinton had asked for the thesis to be sealed because it showed “the extent to which she internalized and assimilated the beliefs and methods of Saul Alinsky.” Clinton opponent turned Clinton defender David Brock referred to her as “Alinsky’s daughter” in 1996′s The Seduction of Hillary Rodham.

NOTE: READ THE HILLARY CLINTON-SAUL ALINSKY LETTERS HERE. (Scroll down a bit at link

 

Late last night, the Washington Free Beacon’s Alana Goodman unearthed previously sealed correspondence between Hillary Clinton and former radical Chicago activist Saul Alinsky. Shortly after, some reporters wasted no time in trying to downplay the story by mocking it. They questioned or failed to see why this was important, yet trumped up trivial stories in comparison about Mitt Romney’s “lost years” during the height of the 2012 presidential election.

In May of 2012, POLITICO’s Glenn Thrush published a story titled, “Mitt Romney in Massachusetts: The lost years.”However, almost the entire article deals with quotes of people talking about Romneycare and his time at Bain Capital — elements and stories of Romney that almost every single person who follows politics knew about at the time due to the mainstream media’s constant, relentless hammering.

H/T:Capital City Project

Previously unpublished correspondence between Hillary Clinton and the late left-wing organizer Saul Alinsky reveals new details about her relationship with the controversial Chicago activist and shed light on her early ideological development.

Clinton met with Alinsky several times in 1968 while writing a Wellesley college thesis about his theory of community organizing.

A 23-year-old Hillary Clinton was living in Berkeley, California, in the summer of 1971. She was interning at the left-wing law firm Treuhaft, Walker and Burnstein, known for its radical politics and a client roster that included Black Panthers and other militants.

On July 8, 1971, Clinton reached out to Alinsky, then 62, in a letter sent via airmail, paid for with stamps featuring Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and marked “Personal.”

“Dear Saul,” she began. “When is that new book [Rules for Radicals] coming out—or has it come and I somehow missed the fulfillment of Revelation?”

“I have just had my one-thousandth conversation about Reveille [for Radicals] and need some new material to throw at people,” she added, a reference to Alinsky’s 1946 book on his theories of community organizing.

Full letters and more over at Free Beacon

I looked for a short clip and came up with this. Longer videos are out there, and worth hearing. The GOP might learn something.

Saul Alinsky Explains Community Organizing as an Outside Agitator. How to infiltrate a Community.

Tea Party folks now Barbarians

Biden: “You Are The Only Folks Keeping The Barbarians From the Gates”

After taking a few days off from this blogging thing, and hoping to get rejuvenated for the big push coming up, I neglected to turn off the T.V. Zero kept popping up, here there and everywhere, in his big airplane. Labor Day was particularly disgusting. Of course, the Marxists would be out making hay of the day, and I expected the rhetoric to pick up. We seem to have come to a new low. My one hope is that good thinking rational people will prevail and tire of the attempt at ginning others up. So what will it be, Rule 6 or Rule 7?  My hunch? It will be the Chicago way. Especially if it looks like they might lose. As their master Alinsky said:

RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)

RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)

So, not only are we sons of bitches, we’re barbarians. Like Hoffa, Jr., Biden also uses the word “fight.” Several times, in fact. He also says “onslaught,” “attack,” “assault,” and “war.”

I can’t say that I like the New Tone. It does sound like tough-guy cheerleading, as Allahpundit says, but there are bound to be a few  out there who will take this as a call to violence, especially given the long history of union-sponsored violence. Let’s hope not, though. H/T: Ace fo Spades

Howard Dean talks about the Alinksy tactics the old Dems use

Here you go. In case you missed it. Howard Dean and Marshall Ganz describe the tactics of ole Alinsky and how it has being used, in case you are still wondering. The question out there,is why now are they revealing all of this? Perhaps we can learn somthing from this. In many ways, it sounds like the Tea Party in some ways, as it was forming.

National Education Association Orders Members to Read Communist Guide Book

The National Education Association (NEA) is the premier teachers union group in the country. Recall how the NEA wanted to School kids to honor Red China and Mao in October? NEA-Lets remember Communism

 Read here  The outrage made them remove it from their Calendar. The March continues. They are not done yet.

Here is how they describe Alinsky’s books:

NEA recommends the following Saul Alinsky books to those members of our Association who are involved in grassroots organizing, especially Association Representatives (ARs) — also known as building reps or shop stewards — and leaders at local affiliates.

Saul Alinsky is widely recognized as the father of, and pre-imminent expert in, grassroots organizing, which is why we recommend that ARs and local leaders become familiar with his theories & materials.

Saul Alinsky is also “widely recognized” as a communist sympathizer, socialist theorist, and left-wing radical. I guess the NEA “forgot” to mention that, eh?

A look at the NEA website reveals a shocking recommendation to its members. The union that represents the teachers that we send our children to every school day suggests that its members read the communist-like manifesto of famed left-wing agitator Saul Alinsky.

That’s right, the NEA wants its members, America’s teachers, to become programmed by the ideas and policy prescriptions in a communist manifesto.

And while making the recommendation, the NEA also absent-mindedly seems to forget that Alinsky was an avowed socialist that wanted to remake America from a representative democracy into a communist state.

The left-wing tracking site DiscoverTheNetworks.org reminds us of what else Alinsky “widely recognized” for:

Alinsky’s brand of revolution was not characterized by dramatic, sweeping, overnight transformations of social institutions. As Richard Poe puts it, “Alinsky viewed revolution as a slow, patient process. The trick was to penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political parties.” He advised organizers and their disciples to quietly, subtly gain influence within the decision-making ranks of these institutions, and to introduce changes from that platform.”

THIS is the un-American agitator that the nation’s largest teachers union wants to expose the teachers we send our kids to, folks. This is why these unions need to be defeated.

Hat Tip and more Right Wing News

Cloward-Piven Strategy

Thanks to a reply from King Shamus to one of our posts, and Glenn Beck mentioning this the past couple of weeks, I decided to go back through the oldie, moldies,  and thought it was a good time to spin this one more time. Since November, when it was originally posted, I can not imagine we have come so far in having this strategy actualized.

’The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined by Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, then both sociologists and political activists at the Columbia University School of Social Work, in a 1966 article in The Nation. The two argued that many Americans who were eligible for welfare were not receiving benefits, and that a welfare enrollment drive would create a political crisis that would force U.S. politicians, particularly the Democratic Party, to enact legislation “establishing a guaranteed national income.’  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward-Piven_Strategy). 

 We all knew this was going on but now we see it ties to Alinsky and our Dear Leader among others.  Really, how dare we be successful, earn as much as we can to NOT be on welfare!  Shame on the industrious, the inquisitive inventors and the giants of our Country.  The penalty is to breakdown the economy by sending manufacturing off shore, make it illegal to utilize our own vast and rich natural resources causing massive loss of jobs cause more to enter the welfare roles leaving the impression of corporate greed.  Yes, there is/was corporate greed and should be dealt with appropriately.  But destroy the entire economy?  Cloward and Piven laid the groundwork along with good old Saul to “transform” our Country into a Socialistic society so the likes of Soros, Gore can make BILLIONS while many of us squander.   Yes, it all comes together, voter fraud, climate change, Cap and Trade, Healthcare.  Well, we can turn this page by making gains today and planning for 2010.  What really amazes me is that with all of the years the Democrats have had power, why aren’t we Socialists now?  Well, of course we know the answer, they can’t run anything.  In November of 2008, The One thought the Sea’s would part and the peasants would follow.  Wait!  Aren’t we Socialists and they didn’t tell us? 

A couple more links to read in your spare time:

  http://cloward-piven.com/ 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward-Piven_Strategy

 Mandy Williams

Obama and CBS Interview – follows Alinksky Rule 3

RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

 Obama has taken megabucks from Wall street.  Timmy Geitner, et al, are from Wall Street. Barney Frank and his Finance Committee insisted that  Banks make Freddie and Fannie Mae  loans to those who could not afford them, The very de-regulation he now insists on regulating. Decides who should win and who should fail?

Yes, find a target and justify your end game, Rule number 12

Yes, there are excesses. This now gives the government the right to take over one more of our institutions?

Please, could we have one day without you Mr. President????

%d bloggers like this: