The Pandemic Treaty -The ‘Great Reset’ for Globalism


The Pandemic Treaty otherwise known as the great Reset. Technocracy is seen as the force behind the proposed “pandemic treaty” that would give the World Health Organization total sovereignty over global health. For the record, the U.S. is on board.

US Supports Creation of Global Pandemic Treaty

The first public hearings on the proposed “Pandemic Treaty” are closed, with the next round due to start in mid-June.

What scant press coverage there is, mostly across the metaphorical back-pages of the internet, will be focused on making the treaty “strong enough” and ensuring national governments can be “held accountable”.

An article in the UK’s Telegraph from April 12th headlines:

Real risk a pandemic treaty could be ‘too watered down’ to stop new outbreaks

It focuses on a report from the Panel for a Global Public Health Convention (GPHC), and quotes one of the report’s authors Dame Barbara Stocking:

Our biggest fear […] is it’s too easy to think that accountability doesn’t matter. To have a treaty that does not have compliance in it, well frankly then there’s no point in having a treaty,”

The GPHC report goes on to say that the current International Health Regulations are “too weak”, and calls for the creation of a new “independent” international body to “assess government preparedness” and “publicly rebuke or praise countries, depending on their compliance with a set of agreed requirements”.

Another article, published by the London School of Economics and co-written by members of the German Alliance on Climate Change and Health (KLUG), also pushes the idea of “accountability” and “compliance” pretty hard:

For this treaty to have teeth, the organisation that governs it needs to have the power – either political or legal – to enforce compliance.

To translate these suggestions from bureaucrat into English:

  • If you report “disease outbreaks” in a “timely manner”, you will get “financial resources” to deal with them.
  • If you don’t report disease outbreaks, or don’t follow the WHO’s directions, you will lose out on international aid and face trade embargoes and sanctions.

In combination, these proposed rules would literally incentivize reporting possible “disease outbreaks”. Far from preventing “future pandemics”, they would actively encourage them.

National governments who refuse to play ball being punished, and those who play along getting paid off is not new. We have already seen that with Covid.

All of which can be generally summed up as “give the WHO (and their cronies) more money, and more power”.

Each section of their recommendations contains several bullet points of its own, far too many to go through all of them, but there’s definitely some paragraphs that should cause any attentive reader to raise an eyebrow:

WHO to establish a new global system for surveillance, based on full transparency by all parties, using state-of-the-art digital tools to connect information centres around the world and including animal and environmental health surveillance, with appropriate protections of people’s rights

…Which means essentially legalising global surveillance programs on a massive scale, with – of course – “appropriate protections
of people’s rights”
(and shame on you for thinking otherwise).

It also echoes the UN report from May 2021 in calling for more powers for the WHO:

And then there is:

Future declarations of a PHEIC by the WHO Director-General should be based on the precautionary principle where warranted

…Which calls for the Director-General of the WHO to have the power to declare a global “pandemic”, not because there definitely is a new disease killing people, but because they think there might be.

Essentially handing the Director-General of the WHO the power to simply create a pandemic whenever they feel the need. Somewhat ironically the panel for “pandemic prevention”, is recommending making “pandemics” far more likely.

Further, the report goes out of its way to praise the countries which engaged in the most authoritarian “anti-Covid” measures.

Specifically, China is praised both for their “fast identification” of the virus, and their incredibly stringent lockdown measures. Another country held up as a good example is New Zealand, which was likewise very strict.

H/T: Technocracy

The best of the swamp today.

Advertisement

33 Responses to “The Pandemic Treaty -The ‘Great Reset’ for Globalism”

  1. Layla Elizabeth Kanas-Gonzalez Says:

    This whole world is upside down. Governments want to control the masses in hopes of accomplishing a “One World Order.” Sick as that is even worse they are using Covid to do it. I received an email yesterday from my county saying to stay vigilant that Covid is on the “up-tick.” Well, they the county must have forgotten that we the people read our mail, and four days prior they sent an email with a Covid checker so you can check how good or bad “where you live is doing (by state and county) – I did this and our country and most around me were low. So which is it? But these are the tactics that if people do not stay sharp will be used to control people, communities and before you know it China will be running around soldering us in our homesteads, apartments, homes, and wherever else they find us.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Baysider Says:

    Concurrent with all this, we have Klaus Schwab’s point man, Yuval “we-are-upgrading-humans-into-gods” Harari, running around saying “Covid is critical to get people to accept full monitoring.” Truth. We’ve known it all along. Minute 8.
    Minute 16: “If you’re not part of the revolution fast enough you probably become extinct.” “What to do with all these useless people? … How will they find some sense of meaning when they are meaningless, worthless?” (drugs and games)
    https://thehighwire.com/videos/humans-are-now-hackable-animals/

    I suggest they are planning on these ideas intersecting with controls WHO is putting place with this “treaty”, control over who lives and who dies. Kinda like Hitler did with the Jews.

    Despite the tag name on that link, you have probably NOT seen this one. It’s not the “hackable animals” speech he gave at the WEF.

    Liked by 2 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      Thanks again. Always good stuff and I appreciate it.The News tonight covering the homeland security hearing said nothing so far about Biden appointing a minister of truth by executive order which was announced at the hearing… will post tomorrow morning.. A gal who was involved with advising Ukraine Communication. You can’t make this stuff up. Right out if 1984/

      Like

  3. lgbmiel Says:

    We have proposed amendments to a treaty we are already under with the WHO.

    These amendments will give our sovereignty to the WHO.

    I’ve been following this on a substack, can’t remember the guy’s name.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. markone1blog Says:

    If this will only be a UN / WHO treaty, what exact measures will they use to enforce compliance to the treaty?

    Liked by 2 people

  5. markone1blog Says:

    So how will this get a two-thirds majority in the Senate (required for the passage of a treaty)?

    Or will this just be a dictatorial action by Biden that will be pulled out of just as soon as he (1) gets impeached or (2) loses the election?

    Liked by 2 people

  6. nrringlee Says:

    The arson state, China, is praised for calling out the fire brigades within months of starting the fire.

    As with any subject of public policy we must first examine the premises and propensities of those who shall be granted power. International agencies do not necessarily share our Natural Law based premises therefore they shall not be granted power and authority over those who do. Plain and simple. Progressives and leftists of all brands are free to admire the Communist Chinese all they like but they are not free to transplant totalitarianism and impose it on the free.

    Liked by 4 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      It sounds good and agree. Unfortunately we cannot count on this administration for much of anything. The Iran deal, Paris Climate whatever and so on. We have a lawless administration who defies the courts. What else could go wrong,

      Liked by 4 people

  7. peter3nj Says:

    Off topic?
    Now that the horse is out of the barn the Goppers are threatening to impeach Majorca for dereliction of duty. Way to go. Next….

    Liked by 3 people

  8. Ed Bonderenka Says:

    At some point, It may come to armed resistance.
    That’s getting to be my goto plan.
    But then who thought Musk would buy Twitter?
    Certainly not those who invested in alternate social media.
    Things can change. It’s usually accompanied by prayer.

    Liked by 5 people

  9. peter3nj Says:

    Globalism has already reached our shores via the Rio Grande. With the SCOTUS spending precious hours for needless testimony on what should be a slam dunk, hours of hearings leading to a decision which will legitimize the dissolution of both our once southern and our northern borders. Get ready as our laws and our constitution are once again as Stalin said will are the rope with which we end our sovereignty. Remember Stalin, he’s the guy who said it’s not who votes but who drives the car with its trunk loaded with illegal ballots that decides elections.

    Liked by 5 people


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: