Supreme court rules Baltimore climate change lawsuit against energy companies can proceed


The Robert’s Supreme court deals another blow. This time to the energy industry. The Supremes will allow a State court to proceed with an energy law suit at the same time the case resides in the fourth circuit federal appeals court for a ruling on jurisdiction.  The court did not disclose a vote count or reasons for rejecting the request for a stay. Just to show how bizarre this is:

Former Mayor Catherine Pugh decided to move ahead with the case, (2018) despite decisions against similar lawsuits in California and New York only days before Baltimore’s filing. In California, District Judge William Alsup determined in May 2018 that cases brought by the cities of San Francisco and Oakland against energy companies belonged in the federal judiciary, and strongly questioned key parts of the case, including the allegation that energy companies had created a “public nuisance” against an entire community. Rebuking the plaintiffs, he stated, “If we didn’t have fossil fuels, would have lost [World War II] and every other war. Planes wouldn’t fly. Trains wouldn’t run. And we’d be back in the Stone Age.”

Read more

But not the first of this:

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld a Virginia law that bans mining at the nation’s largest known uranium deposit.


Sure, why not stop our Uranium production after Hillary was kind enough to give 20 percent of our deposits to the Russians.

The Supreme Court allowed the city of Baltimore to proceed with its climate change lawsuit against two dozen fossil fuel companies Tuesday, after the corporate defendants asked the justices to put the dispute on hold.

The oil and natural gas companies — among them BP, Chevron, Exxon Mobil, and Royal Dutch Shell — are fighting to move Baltimore’s lawsuit out of a Maryland state court into a federal court. They wanted the justices to stop state court proceedings while they fight to remove the dispute to a federal forum.

The lawsuit alleges that the fossil fuel companies have engaged in a “coordinated, multi-front effort” to conceal the harm of greenhouse gas emissions that attend the use of their products. The plaintiffs claim the energy industry has been investigating atmospheric carbon accumulation since at least 1958, and has long been aware of its environmental consequences.

After Baltimore lawyers filed their complaint in state court, the corporate defendants tried to move the case to federal court. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander rejected that request. The companies are now fighting that decision in the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which has yet to produce a decision.

The defendants went to the Supreme Court because state proceedings are slated to continue while the 4th Circuit considers their bid to move the dispute into the federal system.

Read more

A portion of an earlier B-ville post:

Baltimore suit of 26 energy companies for injuries sustained in climate change, heatwaves, continues

In the process, of course, we do untold damage to important industries that we need or want for our country’s wheels to go round. In this case in Baltimore against energy companies.

Another example of this type of action is suing various drug manufacturers for billions of dollars regarding Opioids.  Continuing this course will either bankrupt the companies, or damage them to the extent of limiting the research funds available for new discoveries.

The opioid manufacturers included in the lawsuit are Purdue Pharma, Cephalon, Inc. and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, while the opioid distributors are McKesson Corp., Cardinal Health, Inc. and AmerisourceBergen Drug Corp. More than 1,800 lawsuits have been filed against opioid manufacturers, distributors and pharmacies.

Read more

Other than that all is well in the swamp.

For the best in conservative news push the button. So much better than Drudge.


12 Responses to “Supreme court rules Baltimore climate change lawsuit against energy companies can proceed”

  1. peter3nj Says:

    ISnd how about arithmetic Mustang?! heard on today’s Hannity show hosted by Mark Simone a story that declares math is anti-women. Probably because it’s as difficult as remembering to take the pill on a daily basis or making sure your man is wearing a Morgan wrapper. Wait till geography is declared racist; there will be chaos on the roads, in airports, bus and train stations.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Mustang Says:

      A perfect world will develop when transgender girls shun home economics classes and demand access to varsity football. As for math , I always thought “What’s your syn” was a pick up line.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. Steve Dennis Says:

    This is what the left does to push its agenda through. If they cannot legislate it into effect they force it on us through the courts. What a disappointment Roberts is turning out to be!

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      This actually is the worse news of the week. If the Supremes are letting this go as a state issue then they plan on not being involved. They ruled agains Uranium. Now it looks like it will be energy. A jury will do just what it is doing to drug companies and will bankrupt them.


  3. Mustang Says:

    Based on this information (and trends in the US) there does not appear much justification for offering science in our public schools and universities. What’s the point, if the legal profession intends to ignore good science for the stuff propounded in pulp-fiction periodicals?

    Liked by 1 person

  4. kidme37 Says:

    Well, we know they’re only interested in collecting money, then stealing it, but what the hey, let’s put all the power companies out of business, turn off the electricity and rid ourselves of all these losers in the matter of a month to a month and a half, then we’ll turn the electric back on and bulldoze them into mass graves.


  5. Says:

    Using lawfare to move your agenda is straight out of the commie playbook.


  6. peter3nj Says:

    Since 1958 at least? Who’s going to step up and sue for the prior 50 years? And who’s going to step up and sue on behalf of the dinosaur’s 🦕 having their final resting places being desecrated? Probably PETA (people eating tasty animals).
    And as for opioids, what a great way to rid the country of the deplorables.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: