Why the smear campaign against Tuslsi Gabbard by Clinton?


 

 

Anyone else trying to figure out why the Clinton attack machine chose to put Tulsi Gabbard in the crosshair? It has clearly been an orchestrated campaign by her minions. Planned.

I recall a poll out by Drudge right after the debate with the question as to who won the debate. Gabbard won in a landslide. Of course it was a insignificant poll. Drudge still has predominately GOPers as followers. I would think though that no doubt it is changing with his perverse anti-Trump stories. The polls I had seen had her at the most at 2 percent.

Fox has had her several shows. Tucker Carlson especially a number of times. Was it her anti-war especially Syria stance? Gabbard appeared to be going no where until this.

A puzzle to me. What say you?

 

Still trying to figure this one out..

Top clip is dup… but the Clinton hypocrisy response below it has to be seen. Good laugh.

 

Here is a take by Max Blumenthal ..

 

H/T to News Alert

For the best in conservative news push the button below.

22 Responses to “Why the smear campaign against Tuslsi Gabbard by Clinton?”

  1. markone1blog Says:

    Occam’s razor — maybe Hillary is trying to gin-up (double entendre intended) her chances to be invited as a nominee to the DemocRAT party convention.

    Like

  2. the unit Says:

    Occam’s Razor. She just incontinent. 🙂

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Steve Dennis Says:

    I can’t figure this one out either. It came out of the blue and Gabbard wasn’t going anywhere in the polls so even if there was something between them in the past it doesn’t seem worth the effort for Hillary to try to sabotage her campaign. But there has to be some reason why…

    Liked by 1 person

  4. GP Cox Says:

    I think their life in politics has taken its toll on both the Clintons, leaving Hillary’s sanity in question.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. Mustang Says:

    Tulsi is fighting a two-front war: one against her perceived “front runner” Democratic opponents, and the other for the hearts (not minds) of independent voters. I excluded “minds” because if anyone was thinking carefully about Tulsi, they would find that she is a dedicated socialist/communist. Why we cheer her on, I think, is because she is battling the wicked witch of the north and all of us want to see Hillary Clinton buried in a heap of her own shit. But there is nothing of “conservative American values” about Tulsi Gabbard.

    Liked by 2 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      I agree totally. We shouldn’t lull ourselves into thinking this is a moderate. Fox now calling buttidge sp. a moderate. Still I am wondering about what caused Hillary to shoot both barrels. No doubt podesta at this point. My hunch

      Liked by 2 people

    • Always On Watch Says:

      Mustang,
      Yes, Tulsi is indeed a dedicated socialist/communist. Strange that Hillary is so opposed to her — except that HRC hates anyone that obtains a political office that the she envies. Even now, when HRC has been rejected by any American with one gray cell operational.

      Liked by 3 people

  6. markone1blog Says:

    My bet is just that Hillary is grasping at straws and throwing the “Russian asset” moniker at Gabbard might actually do harm to the one Democrat Hillary doesn’t have a skeleton or two on.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. peter3nj Says:

    I agree with this morning’s comments but taking a simplistic approach to the Blumenthal interview it’s annoying to hear this guy and the interviewer equating Clinton’s methods to McCarthyism; McCarthy was right about Hollywood, he was right about the communists infiltration into every department, every cubbyhole of the US government bureaucracy that remains with us to this day. And so, unencumbered the soviets also picked off academia, the phones women’s movement and the radical negro movement.
    In addition these two turds on the Grey Line interview portrayed Trump as a pretend anti-war guy as well as a xenophobic racist. They weren’t content to expose Clinton, Powers, Rhodes et al for igniting the Middle East, they had to criticize Netanyahu and Trump in their screed.
    As Bunker says All’s well in the swamp.

    Liked by 3 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      I agree with you. After the fact I realized he was Sidney Blumenthal’s son. Little commentary out there on why Hillary did this other than odd speculation that doesn’t add up to me. Thought others may come up with something. I don’t buy the threat of a third party candidate.
      She was barely at 2 or 3 percent.
      My only thought was a salvo to
      Blumenthal not to run if you buy into the third party idea. But he could hurt trump as much.

      Liked by 1 person

      • hocuspocus13 Says:

        In the 2016 Presidential election Gabbard endorsed Bernie Sanders (an outspoken socialist) over Crooked Hillary

        And Gabbard spoke out about how the Crooked Hillary gang rigged the DemoKKKrat Primary against Bernie

        Unfortunately at that time it fell on deaf ears

        But still that Gabbard endorsement of a socialist should concern every voting American 🇺🇸

        Liked by 2 people

      • bunkerville Says:

        Hp. Agree. 95 percent approval voting record with progressives. Now petty is something I can see by Hillary. But her sycophants would have to see this as petty and not productive wouldn’t they? The NY Times et all got their talking points apparently. Hard to think all thought this a great idea.

        Liked by 2 people

      • hocuspocus13 Says:

        Remember…

        Gabbard was on the “committee”

        The DNC when Debbie Wasserman Shultz was chairperson

        They butt heads and Gabbard quit the “committee”

        Liked by 1 person

      • bunkerville Says:

        I see a tweet from wiki leaks that John podesta funded her campaign in 2012. Tens of thousands of buckerroos. Makes sense now. Link is in my twitter feed.

        Liked by 2 people

  8. hocuspocus13 Says:

    Gabbard is not a Crooked Hillary type DemoKKKrat nor is she someone Nervous Nancy Pelosi could control

    Gabbard isn’t a Blue Dog either (if there’s really any left in the DemoKKKrat party) ???

    Gabbard has also been said to have a slice of Republican hidden inside her

    I like that she speaks her mind but I do not believe Gabbard is experienced enough to be President

    She would have to depend on a lot of people to help her make decisions that she is not qualified to make on her own

    Those are the very same people we voted out in 2016

    John Stossel interviewed Gabbard recently

    …and PS

    Crooked Hillary should take a very worthwhile lesson from Senator Feinstein and lay low STFU and stay out of the public eye

    Especially when (just as Feinstein) your as guilty as SIN 👺👺👺

    Liked by 3 people


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: