The Clinton’s interference in Russian Elections – Payback can be hell


In 1996 the US government interfered in Russia’s election so blatantly that it was boasted on the cover of Time magazine. .  Oh what a tangled web this is. The outrage that Russia interfered in our election as reported by the Mueller report. The gnashing of teeth.

Let’s take a look at the dots. While this whole mess was laid at the feet of Trump I suggest it has been the Clinton’s – Bill and Hillary and their continued meddling in Russian politics that was the latest instigation to drive Putin to get even with them to the extent he did.

Bill Clinton meddled in Russian Election.

What many Russians, but few Americans, know is that 20 years before Russia tried to swing an American presidential election, America tried to swing a presidential election in Russia. The year was 1996. Boris Yeltsin was seeking a second term, and Bill Clinton desperately wanted to help. “I want this guy to win so bad,” he told Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, “it hurts.”

So the Clinton administration sprang into action. It lobbied the International Monetary Fund to give Russia a $10 billion loan, some of which Yeltsin distributed to woo voters. Upon arriving in a given city, he often announced, “My pockets are full.”

Three American political consultants—including Richard Dresner, a veteran of Clinton’s campaigns in Arkansas—went to work on Yeltsin’s reelection bid. Every week, Dresner sent the White House the Yeltsin campaign’s internal polling. And before traveling to meet Yeltsin in April, Clinton asked Dresner what he should say in Moscow to boost his buddy’s campaign.

It worked. In a stunning turnaround, Yeltsin—who had begun the campaign in last place—defeated his communist rival in the election’s final round by 13 percentage points.

Read more

President Bill Clinton meddled in Russian affairs in the 1990s and helped Boris Yeltsin get elected to a second term, political analyst Dick Morris told Newsmax TV.

“I think that Putin resented that, hated it, thought that it was an inappropriate intervention by Bill Clinton and I think he’s determined to take his revenge out on Hillary Clinton.” Quote from Dick Morris.




But the Clinton’s weren’t done with Putin. Not by a long shot, not Hillary:

In December 2011, Vladimir Putin came closer than he’s ever been to losing his hold on power. His decision that year to run for a third term as Russia’s President had inspired a massive protest movement against him. Demonstrations calling for him to resign were attracting hundreds of thousands of people across the country. Some of his closest allies had defected to the opposition, causing a split in the Kremlin elites, and Russian state media had begun to warn of a revolution in the making.

At a crisis meeting with his advisers on Dec. 8 of that year, the Russian leader chose to lay the blame on one meddling foreign diplomat: U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

“She set the tone for certain actors inside the country; she gave the signal,” Putin said of Clinton at the time, accusing her of ordering the opposition movement into action like some kind of revolutionary sleeper cell. “They heard this signal and, with the support of the U.S. State Department, started actively doing their work.”

Five years later, the U.S. presidential elections may have given Putin his chance for getting even. According to Clinton’s campaign staff and a number of cyber-security experts, Russian hackers in the service of the Kremlin were behind last week’s leak of emails from the Democratic National Committee. (Written July 16, 2016)

Read more

So now we come full circle with this who dun it.  Hillary was in the Russian Bull’s Eye…Trump happened to get elected. Oh, there is a lot more to this tale…stay tuned. By the way,

Want more Russia Russia Russia?

If the progressives want to know what actual treason looks like, they should have consulted liberal lion Ted Kennedy, who not only allegedly sent secret messages to the Soviets in the midst of the cold war, he also begged them to intervene in a U.S. presidential election in order to unseat President Ronald Reagan.



That’s no exaggeration. According to Soviet documents unearthed in the early 1990’s, Kennedy literally asked the Soviets, avowed enemies of the U.S., to intervene on behalf of the Democratic party in the 1984 elections. Kennedy’s communist communique was so secret that it was not discovered until 1991, eight years after Kennedy had initiated his Soviet gambit:

Picking his way through the Soviet archives that Boris Yeltsin had just thrown open, in 1991 Tim Sebastian, a reporter for the London Times, came across an arresting memorandum. Composed in 1983 by Victor Chebrikov, the top man at the KGB, the memorandum was addressed to Yuri Andropov, the top man in the entire USSR.

The subject: Sen. Edward Kennedy.

Kennedy would make certain the networks gave Andropov air time–and that they rigged the arrangement to look like honest journalism.

According to Soviet documents unearthed in the early 1990’s, Kennedy literally asked the Soviets, avowed enemies of the U.S., to intervene on behalf of the Democratic party in the 1984 elections. Kennedy’s communist communique was so secret that it was not discovered until 1991, eight years after Kennedy had initiated his Soviet gambit:


“On 9-10 May of this year,” the May 14 memorandum explained, “Sen. Edward Kennedy’s close friend and trusted confidant [John] Tunney was in Moscow.” (Tunney was Kennedy’s law school roommate and a former Democratic senator from California.) “The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message, through confidential contacts, to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov.”

Kennedy’s message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election. “The only real potential threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations,” the memorandum stated. “These issues, according to the senator, will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign.”

Kennedy made Andropov a couple of specific offers.

First he offered to visit Moscow. “The main purpose of the meeting, according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA.” Kennedy would help the Soviets deal with Reagan by telling them how to brush up their propaganda.

Then he offered to make it possible for Andropov to sit down for a few interviews on American television. “A direct appeal … to the American people will, without a doubt, attract a great deal of attention and interest in the country. … If the proposal is recognized as worthy, then Kennedy and his friends will bring about suitable steps to have representatives of the largest television companies in the USA contact Y.V. Andropov for an invitation to Moscow for the interviews. … The senator underlined the importance that this initiative should be seen as coming from the American side.”


More The Federalist

12 Responses to “The Clinton’s interference in Russian Elections – Payback can be hell”

  1. trutherator Says:

    Reagan’s team negotiated sectetly with the Iranians, Nixon with the Saudis, the Clinton’s with anybody, Obama with Deep State and corrupt DOJ and FBI political heads, and the Congress with each other, all what to do with stolen loot aka taxes.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. dave drake Says:

    I notice in that pic Ted’s car keys aren’t on the table. The Russians had the good sense to take them away from him? 😀

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Steve Dennis Says:

    And they have the audacity to claim they were offended this non story of Trump/Russia collusion…

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Always On Watch Says:

    I agree with every word of Mustang’s comment.

    We can only hope that the electorate is watching this clown show of corruption being presented over and over again by the Dems, both politicians and the mainstream media.

    Liked by 3 people

  5. Mustang Says:

    American government is corrupt —not because our founding documents were flawed, or even because our founding documents are inadequate to modern society. No, American government is corrupt because American politicians are corrupt. American voters are part of the problem because most of the people who continually vote for Democrats (nee progressives/neo-communists) do not themselves understand the underlying philosophies of our founding documents. They do not embrace Americanism. How this is even possible is explained by looking at the American education system, which for the past three to four generations, has produced the world’s dumbest people—which is to say, “citizens” who do not know their own history, do not know who their ancestors were, or what they accomplished for future generations, do not understand republicanism, but who have become aces in matters of affirmative action and social justice. Personally, I believe that a dumbed-down American is exactly what the political left has intended since the 1920’s. Their goals have been achieved, and it ought to worry the hell out of the 52 to 54 percent of thinking, patriotic, god-fearing Americans who are keeping America afloat.

    As evidence of the foregoing, ask any progressive-minded person to explain the criminal behavior of Ted Kennedy and Bill or Hillary Clinton, and the response you’re likely to receive is something like, “That’s ancient history.” They are totally dismissive of behavior that, quite frankly, is dangerous to the safety and security of the United States … and if not in physical terms, then most assuredly from a psychological position. Ask yourself this, what credibility does the American government have today among our allies and our competitors? It is no wonder Putin smirks whenever questioned about the Democrat’s “collusion” claims. How do our closest allies trust the US government when they rightly conclude that the US government is corrupt, self-serving, and completely untrustworthy?

    I’ll finish by arguing that unless the American people come to their senses and begin a thorough vetting of political candidates, from local and state officials to candidates for national offices, nothing will change. If we continue down this road —if we continue voting for D’s and R’s for no other reason than because our daddy did— then America’s future generations won’t be better off than our citizens today, which no matter how you cut it, is NOT progress, not republicanism, and is truly NOT American.

    Liked by 4 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      That is so Mustang…. I do have renewed interest in how and if any unfolding of the truth of what went down here comes through and enters the media awareness and voters heads.

      Liked by 3 people

    • markone1blog Says:

      From this, I might get the impression that you would not support AOC in her socialist screed supporting the Green New Deal. Additionally, something says you might have little support of Warren’s desire to rid us of the Electoral College.

      Nonetheless, could we get you on the prosecutorial team looking into the former Madam Secretary? I would love to see her sweat.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Mustang Says:

      All this business about “collusion” is silly. Even if it were true, colluding is not an illegal activity. I’ll say what is an illegal activity: conspiracy—and there does seem to be evidence of that. Hillary Clinton (and her campaign) conspired to float the totally manufactured Trump Dossier, which in turn was used to secure FISA warrants. There was a conspiracy by senior agents of the FBI to destroy a sitting president. There was a conspiracy … during the presidency of Barack Obama, to investigate the 2016 elections fronting an untrue narrative, which was then seized upon by news media, who aided and abetted the conspiracy with the Obama administration, FBI, and Hillary Campaign to destroy the reputations of numerous people, including Trump, who was at that time not the president of the United States, but a citizen candidate for the presidency. In answer to the harping Democrats, yes indeed … we need a further examination of the facts —so let us now investigate the conspiracy by Democratic Party leadership and let the facts be known to the American people. More to the point, since conspiracy is an illegal activity, let those who contrived —who caused a waste of the taxpayer’s money to the tune of $25-million, stand in the dock and answer for their crimes. Let’s have equal justice under the law —for a change.

      As for AO-C … she is an idiot. I am not at all surprised that Warren, perhaps one of the most intellectually dishonest people in the country, should want a Constitutional amendment abolishing the electoral college. Her demand proves the wisdom of our founding fathers who incorporated it. Meanwhile, the rest of the western world look upon American politics, rolls their eyes, and wonders aloud, “What next?”

      Liked by 3 people

      • bunkerville Says:

        I am with you…… the house of cards should fall….. whether it will remains to be seen. So far, I see no change in the Media’s attacks on Trump. We are looking at pure evil.

        Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: