Comey’s proposed statement on Hillary Clinton classified email, and changes made


If anyone is questioning what the DOJ is doing to the Inspector General’s report that is now in their hands for the past weeks look no further than the changes that were made by the FBI to the original Comey document some time ago. Sharyl Attkinson’s good piece of work. Updated post.

The Senate released 500 pages of information including unredacted Strzok/Page texts that expose the FBI corruption starting earlier than we were told… December of 2015 instead of July of 2016! There was also an effort to place more than one spy into the Trump campaign.

1) BOMBSHELL- From DECEMBER 2015–The word LURES is redacted by FBI but not OIG “OCONUS LURES” OCONUS= Outside Contiguous US LURES= In this context LURES = SPIES – multiple Is this an admission that the FBI wanted to run a baited Sting Op using foreign agents against Trump?

Was Obama spying on the entire group of 16 Republicans running for president? December of 2015 was well before there was a frontrunner even a top three in the group of candidates. It is a possibility that Obama could have directed the corrupt FBI and DOJ to spy on all 16 candidates or was this an effort to prepare to place spies into the campaign of the eventual nominee.

More

Document 34: What Comey originally proposed to say about Clinton classified email, and the changes FBI reviewing official suggested:

If you want some light reading Sharyl Attkinson has provided a link to the complete file of Comey and changes to the original documents. This file was just released by the Senate and is brand new.

Document 34 and more can be read here:

17 Responses to “Comey’s proposed statement on Hillary Clinton classified email, and changes made”

  1. justiceforuswgo Says:

    I sent you an email about the FBI boss corruption in Greensboro, NC. This is very serious and needs your attention before this whistleblower ends up dead because the FBI boss in Greensboro protects a corrupt political crime family, in my opinion I think they may be a criminal political family, and Brian is screwing up the perfection of the FBI boss by blowing the whistle and filing a FOIA request. They may be considering coming after him unless blogs can cover this. Truth dies in darkness.

    Like

  2. Kid Says:

    So much crime, corruption, and treason occurred during the obama years, the documentation would make war and peace look like a short story.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      Point well made… so little time… and now it has gotten so big, few have or can take the time to try and figure all the ins and outs of it. One needs a Racing sheet to follow all of the characters.

      Like

  3. geeez2014 Says:

    I just ‘love’ the INTENTION word…as if someone would want to crawl into Hillary’s head and figure out what she was thinking? Who knows INTENT?? Comey? REALLY?!!!

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      I am with you… bet the IG report will be watered down to unrecoginizable.

      Like

      • geeez2014 Says:

        Trump is so right when he says he wants the report NOW and he believes it’s taking so long so it’s redacted to death….imagine if the Right withheld info this long? Oh, the freakin’ HYPOCRISY!

        Liked by 1 person

    • Mustang Says:

      “Intent” is not part of the criminal statute. Whether intentional or not, divulging classified information is a federal felony, as anyone convicted of such below the level of a Clinton can well attest. But since we are speaking about classified information and the Obama presidency, didn’t Secretary of Defense Panetta release the names of Navy Seals who participated in the killing of Osama bin Laden? As I recall, these names were “classified SECRET” and this information was released to Hollywood producers. So you have to wonder how bad, really, was Assange or Snowden?

      Liked by 1 person

      • bunkerville Says:

        Last i read I think there are about 400 k contractors who have approval to classified info.. there are no secrets anymore, or/and no one cares anymore anyway. Treason? A joke.

        Like

  4. Mustang Says:

    Justice delayed is justice denied. In the case of American people vs. Deep State … justice is being denied from multiple agencies of the government. I’m thinking that in the name of transparancy, we should rename the Justice Department. Perhaps Department of Lying, Manipulative, Self-serving Snakes would be a more adequate description.

    Liked by 1 person

    • geeez2014 Says:

      I’d reserve “self serving snakes” for our media which slams anybody bringing these truths up….”the Right is trying to destroy the FBI~!” “The Right doesn’t believe in Justice and is trying to destroy the DoJ!” etc… The Alinsky Rules have never ever been quite so obvious, have they.

      Liked by 2 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      I would have thought the primary GOP’s should have racked up double digits ahead of any dem as far as turn out…. apparently they don’t think they are lucky to have the employment numbers we have.

      Like

  5. Laura Bernard Mielcarek Says:

    Of course they were spying on all the candidates. I think they were ‘spying’ on lots of people.

    Here is a partial timeline of events:
    November 2015-April 2016 – The FBI and DOJ’s National Security Division (NSD) uses private contractors to access raw FISA information using “To” and “From” FISA-702(16) & “About” FISA-702(17) queries.
    March 2016 – NSA Director Rogers becomes aware of improper access to raw FISA data.
    April 2016 – Rogers orders the NSA compliance officer to run a full audit on 702 NSA compliance.
    April 18 2016 – Rogers shuts down FBI/NSD contractor access to the FISA Search System.
    April-September 2016 – Rogers continues his investigation.
    September 26 2016 – DOJ’s NSD Head John Carlin files the Government’s proposed 2016 Section 702 certifications. The filing does not disclose the FISA Abuses. Carlin is aware of Rogers’ compliance review. The 2016 certifications are scheduled for Court approval on October 26, 2016.
    September 27 2016 – Carlin announces he is resigning. Mary McCord will later assume his position.
    October 15, 2016 – Carlin formally leaves the NSD.
    Mid-October 2016 – DNI Clapper submits a recommendation to the White House that Director Rogers be removed from the NSA. Clapper’s effort fails.
    October 20 2016 – Rogers is briefed by the NSA compliance officer on the Section 702 NSA compliance audit and “About” query violations.
    October 21 2016 – Rogers shuts down all “About Query” activity. Rogers reports the activity to DOJ and prepares to go before the FISA Court.
    October 21 2016 – DOJ & FBI seek and receive a Title I FISA probable cause order authorizing electronic surveillance on Carter Page from the FISC. At this point, the FISA Court is unaware of the Section 702 violations.
    October 24 2016 – Rogers verbally informs the FISA Court of Section 702(17) violations.
    October 26 2016 – Rogers formally informs the FISA Court of 702(17) violations in writing.
    October 26, 2016 – The FISA Court refuses to formalize the 2016 Section 702 certifications. A complete overhaul of Section 702 processes ensues.
    November 17 2016 (morning) – Rogers travels to meet President-Elect Trump and his Transition Team in Trump Tower. Rogers does not inform DNI James Clapper.
    November 17 2016 (evening) – Trump Transition Team announces they are moving all transition activity to Trump National Golf Club in New Jersey.
    https://themarketswork.com/2018/05/05/a-quiet-hero-nsa-director-admiral-mike-rogers-retires/

    Who knows how long the obama admin was abusing the FISA to, from, and about queries.

    Here is the NSA IG report on the FISA abuses: https://www.intelligence.gov/assets/documents/702%20Documents/declassified/NSA_IG_Report_1_7_16_ST-15-0002.pdf

    This is the FISA Court report on the same:

    Click to access 2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017.pdf

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Ed Bonderenka Says:

    It’s very early in the morning for me.
    Help me understand.
    If Sharyl Attkisson knows the truth, and is publishing it, what is the point of altering it?
    If she can get the original, why are they redacting?

    Liked by 1 person


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: