Dee Dee Myers in 1993 on why Clinton White House stopped on-camera briefings


Maybe someone could forward this tidbit of information over to the Clinton Crime Network aka CNN just for the facts. Acosta is having a meltdown as well as many of his colleagues in trying to determine fact from fiction. Or rather, whether they should even bother to care, I give you this:

With mainstream media reporters telling their audiences that the end is nigh over the Trump White House decision to hold fewer press briefings on camera, few are mentioning that the move is not without precedent — with President Bill Clinton’s White House turning off the cameras in the ’90s because they weren’t “necessary.”

Dee Dee Myers in 1993 on why Clinton White House stopped on-camera briefings

But a March 1993 C-SPAN interview with then-White House Press Secretary Dee Dee Myers is putting a wrench in that particular narrative. In that interview, Myers said they stopped allowing cameras for White House briefings conducted by Communications Director George Stephanopoulos as they weren’t “really necessary.”

She noted that there were multiple briefings where cameras were allowed, and even the beginning of Stephanopoulos’s briefing was on-camera, but that the presence of cameras meant that the briefings were less productive.

“The briefing is more an opportunity to exchange ideas and to have a conversation about what’s happening,” Myers said, in a similar argument made presently by Trump administration officials. “That wasn’t really happening in a way that … as productively as we had hoped. H/T: Breitbart

PATHETIC: CNN’s Jim Acosta Begs Sean Spicer to ‘Turn the Cameras On, Sean!’

Trump rips CNN’s Jim Acosta during press conference

21 Responses to “Dee Dee Myers in 1993 on why Clinton White House stopped on-camera briefings”

  1. The Weekly Headlines – Br Andrew's Muses Says:

    […] Dee Dee Myers in 1993 on why Clinton White House stopped on-camera briefings […]

    Like

  2. The Weekly Headlines – My Daily Musing Says:

    […] Dee Dee Myers in 1993 on why Clinton White House stopped on-camera briefings […]

    Liked by 1 person

  3. geeez2014 Says:

    Oh, BRILLIANT FIND! Ya, a Dem can say “It was our judgment that…” if a Republican says that there’s hell to pay…but “our judgment” shuts the smiling media off, “OH, OKAY!”
    Really good find…this is the type of thing I WISH (Oh, how I wish ) the WH would have shown on FOX or even a video behind Spicer some day when the cameras ARE ON!! They’re losing the optics war and they could SO be winning if they played it smarter.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Hootin' anni Says:

    Let ’em whine….they’re making fools of themselves & the dems are blind & deaf…perhaps the voters will wise up & vote ’em out. Wishful thinking on my part, I know.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Steve Dennis Says:

    I have to admit it was kind of fun to listen to Acosta’s breakdown!

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Mustang Says:

    I’d love to see Acosta in the role of Moses begging the Pharaoh to let his people go … 🙂

    Liked by 2 people

  7. Simply Linda Says:

    The Communist News Network is beyond repair…I would ban Acosta from the briefings all together. Same with MSNBC and scary Mika and Joe. All unhinged. lol

    Liked by 3 people

  8. Kid Says:

    After their admission of making up the Russia story, I would ban CNN from the newsroom.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Mustang Says:

    The entire American left is pathetic.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. Brittius Says:

    Reblogged this on Brittius.

    Liked by 1 person


Leave a reply to bunkerville Cancel reply