Prime Minister May’s terrorism solution? Restrict the Internet


It would be one thing if control of the internet was focused on radical Islam converting others to mayhem and violence. But if history tells us anything, control of speech ends up as  the first step and the hallmark of moving toward a totalitarian State. So if you have concern that Prime Minister May might be a bad choice in the upcoming British election, check out my earlier post Could the British Labor Party Corbyn Win the British Election?  Here we go with the latest.

British Prime Minister Theresa May called for a bold measure after her nation suffered yet another deadly terror attack in the heart of London.

No, May did not call for reforming the United Kingdom’s immigration policies or shutting down known extremist mosques. She instead called for restricting the internet.

“We need to work with allied democratic governments to reach international agreements to regulate cyberspace to prevent the spread of extremist and terrorism planning,” May stated in her Sunday speech. She also declared that the “pluralistic values of Britain” must be established as “superior” to any other value set.

The UK already has a lengthy record for targeting so-called “Islamophobia” spread on the Internet. Back in 2013, the British government arrested several citizens in the middle of the night over their “racist” comments following a Muslim extremist decapitating British soldier Lee Rigby in broad daylight.

In February 2016, U.K. police arrested a Scottish man who was upset over the large number of refugees who were set to settle in his small town. A month later, authorities detained a London man for his apparently “Islamophobic” tweet in response to the Brussels terror attack.

And this is just the United Kingdom being discussed here. Pretty much every single Western European country is obsessed with silencing “hate speech” online and Germany has gone as far as to threaten to hit Facebook with a massive $53 million fine if the platform doesn’t comply with its demands to censor “offensive” views.

More at  Daily Caller

33 Responses to “Prime Minister May’s terrorism solution? Restrict the Internet”

  1. uapsnu Says:

    So, Theresa May on her political honeymoon turned out to be an inflatable woman who let herself down. Jeremy Corbyn was toast until the election popped up. Theresa May, the church mouse, insisted on giving us a sermon. Now the only question is: for how long can the Tories prop up a DUP government? If Theresa May she was a policewoman she’d be out of a job by now. Yes, Theresa, as you said: Enough is enough!

    Like

  2. thoughtfullyprepping Says:

    It’s a difficult time for us who see behind the B.S. of our government.
    With no decent politics in the UK, politicial correctness, multiculturalism, and that so called ‘religious tolerence’. Appeasement policies for everyone except the ‘Indigenous English’ (and I’m using that racial term very carefully), plus the full on attack of what freedoms we have, what’s to like?

    The UK (Great Britain of old) is done.
    Like the rest of the West.
    Ironically TEOTWAWKI might actually save us.

    Like

  3. Peppermint Says:

    Besides us, Russia, Poland, and Hungary are standing up to these terrorists. Hungary and Poland are now being threatened by the EU to kick them out for not accepting these dubious immigrants. So we are not the only ones standing against this.
    Germany and the UK are done with. It won’t be long before the Muslims have a Caliphate in Germany for sure and then the UK. What a sad story!

    Like

  4. bydesign001 Says:

    Can’t stand these globalists.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. bydesign001 Says:

    My first reaction was “did she say what I think she said?” Then I thought to myself, “what the hell is that going to do….oh.” A part of me suspects that Obama’s people are eight years of bogus sharing talking points with the EU.

    May, Corbyn, two sides of the same coin. Oh boy.

    Liked by 3 people

  6. Mustang Says:

    Angela Merkle is as vile as Hillary Clinton, 😢

    Liked by 2 people

  7. Steve Dennis Says:

    I am with you, I do not trust any government to simply make the restrictions narrow and focused on the problem. And even if they do it will just expand over time. All of these terrorists were known to the government and yet they did nothing about it until people died, that is the real problem. They know where these people are and they are too afraid to go after them so they will punish everybody.

    Liked by 3 people

  8. teelee2013 Says:

    Satan is hard at work.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. Zilla Says:

    Never forget, Theresa May banned Pamela Geller & Robert Spencer from setting foot on British soil because they tell the truth about islam. An internet crackdown from May will likely be a crackdown on criticism of islam rather than ever going after her islamic masters.

    Liked by 4 people

  10. Laura Bernard Mielcarek Says:

    I don’t want to think this but, these countries’ leaders are confirming my opinion – the US is the last man standing.

    An afterthought….what about Mexico??? Where does Mexico stand on immigration? Accepting refugees? Allowing hordes of muslim immigrants to flood the country and take over their way of life????

    Liked by 2 people

  11. Always On Watch Says:

    These dhimmis will do anything to avoid addressing the real problem: the militant doctrines in the Quran. 😦

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Adrienne Says:

    Why would you want to shut down your richest source of info on what these freaks are planning? Stupid!

    Liked by 2 people

  13. hocuspocus13 Says:

    How about legally allowing the British Citizens to arm themselves so they can fight back with deadly weapons rather than throwing beer bottles and chairs to try to save their lives 🤔

    Worth considering…

    Liked by 4 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      Throw in allowing the police as well. As of now only ten percent carry. Yep, so easy

      Liked by 1 person

    • John Liming Says:

      That is about the most sensible thing I have heard all day. Yes, let the citizens arm themselves so they are not sitting ducks in the middle of a terrorist-friendly country and let the citizens shoot back instead of allowing themselves to be slaughtered like sheep.

      Liked by 1 person

  14. Brittius Says:

    Reblogged this on Brittius and commented:
    Well, at least she did not ban white vans (yet).

    Liked by 2 people

  15. David Montaigne Says:

    This isn’t fighting terrorism, it’s fighting freedom, and consolidating more power.
    Europe’s leaders act like traitors – puppets for the NWO who want terrorism; they want Europe to collapse and allow a third world war that will concentrate the power of the elite in a postwar one world government and currency.

    There is no way so many nations would simultaneously adopt immigration policies equivalent to national suicide if it wasn’t being planned.

    Read: Nostradamus and the Islamic Invasion of Europe – https://www.amazon.com/Nostradamus-Islamic-Invasion-Europe-Montaigne/dp/1546435840

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Simply Linda Says:

    Yeah, that will do it (sarcastic)…geesh Louise, these folks need to wake up. What will it take? Shaking my head. I heard her speech last night and went “What the Beep.” Are these folks in government really that stupid? No, they want complete control of the people.

    Liked by 2 people


Leave a comment