Clinton battles Russian hacking of voting machines not hooked up to the Internet


Pumabydesign001 has done a couple of good posts that are worthy of a read. I am not as sanguine as the media that we have nothing to be concerned about. The Sunday Post done and linked below outlines my concerns as well. At the very least, Michigan would have a difficult time recounting by the December 19 date the Electoral College meets. PA has no paper backup of votes. The machines are being kept in a warehouse. So here they are:

In follow up to Sunday’s post, Jill Stein, Hillary Clinton collude to steal election from Donald Trump,

“It’s been a long night and it’s been a long campaign but I can say, uh, we can wait a little longer, can’t we? There still counting votes and every vote should count….She has done an amazing job and she is not done yet.”

John Podesta, Hillary Clinton Campaign Mgr.,
Jacob Javits Center, NYC 11/09/2016

I thought that I’d share the following from Independent Sentinel with you.Hillary’s lawyer wrote that the campaign “had not uncovered any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology” but now that Jill Stein has taken up the effort to order recounts in key states, “we intend to participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides.”

The reason they are doing this they claim is because of so-called interference by “Russian state actors” who were allegedly “behind the hacks of the Democratic National Committee and the personal email accounts of Hillary for America campaign officials”. He doesn’t stop with that now-old saw. He refers to a fake article based on a fake news source published on Thursday by the Washington Post claiming “the Russian government was behind much of the “fake news” propaganda”.

In order for the Russians to be behind the fake hacking of electronic voting machines, they would have to be hooked up to the Internet. The voting machines are not hooked up to the Internet[…]Continue Reading

H/T: Pumabydesign001

Advertisements

27 Responses to “Clinton battles Russian hacking of voting machines not hooked up to the Internet”

  1. Hootin' Anni Says:

    I think its a scam – all about the $ ’cause it makes no sense [pun intended].
    There’d be a civil war.

    Like

    • bunkerville Says:

      I agree. The only question is how much mischief can they cause.

      Like

  2. Steve Dennis Says:

    That is a great point about the machines not even being connected to the internet! This was right there before us the whole time and it was so simple that I am ashamed to have not thought about that before!

    Liked by 2 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      All in all we shall see if it is much adieu about nothing. I am holding my powder only because I am sure the Clintons are behind all of this nonsense.

      Like

  3. the unit Says:

    Poster picture of Democrats, Rinos, and #Nevers on Inauguration Day 2017. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      Well done Unit. Accurate description.

      Like

  4. Sparky Says:

    This made me chuckle. Sorry. Not at you, of course, but the depths of the Demoncrat’s deceit. I forget where I heard or read this but I understand that all the fuss is being made because Jill Stein and Clinton still get to rake in the contribution cash while all this is going on. You know, follow the money trail.

    Liked by 2 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      That and anything to detract from moving forward.

      Like

  5. teelee2013 Says:

    Stinks so bad.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      Yepper. That describes it.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. Laura Bernard Mielcarek Says:

    The purpose of the recounts is delay and prevention. Delaying the states certification of the votes and preventing them from casting their electoral votes.

    If all three states – has to be all 3 – don’t make the deadline, neither PE Trump nor Clinton have enough Electoral votes and the House chooses the president.

    Those devious bastards!!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Laura Bernard Mielcarek Says:

      P.S. Russia’s got nothing to with this and MI has all paper ballots!

      Liked by 1 person

      • bunkerville Says:

        I’m with you on this one…

        Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      The American Thinker has it down.
      http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/11/the_democrats_real_strategy_in_launching_recounts.html

      Like

      • Laura Bernard Mielcarek Says:

        I would very much like to know where the author received his updated ‘information’ at the end of the article. I don’t think he is correct. I did research before I posted. I couldn’t find anything.

        Here’s one thing I found.

        The Supreme Court decision allowed the previous vote certification to stand, as made by Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris, for George W. Bush as the winner of Florida’s 25 electoral votes. Florida’s votes gave Bush, the Republican candidate, 271 electoral votes, one more than the required 270 electoral votes to win the Electoral College, and defeat Democratic candidate Al Gore, who received 266 electoral votes (a District of Columbia elector abstained). (emphasis mine) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore

        Since one of the D.C. electors chose not to vote, by AT’s update at the bottom of the article, the total Electors should have dropped from 538 to 537 and a majority would be 269 not 270. As we see,though, 270 is the number cited as being needed to win. Nothing is even said about 270 not being the number needed because one elector abstained.

        Not even mentioning how every voter in every state which didn’t send its electors (unless it was a state passed initiative/issue) was horrendously disenfranchised if the slate of electors whom they voted for and was ultimately elected, was prevented from casting its vote. It’s unthinkable.

        Like

      • bunkerville Says:

        It is a moot point at this point I think. PA requirements will be impossible. Its not a recount she is asking for — she had to do it within 5 days if she suspected shananigans. Only if she intends to try and take this to the Supremes and unlikely…

        Liked by 1 person

      • Laura Bernard Mielcarek Says:

        Yes, yes, yes, thankfully it is a moot point!

        Now, what is Stein going to do with all that money she raised…..? 😉

        Liked by 1 person

      • bunkerville Says:

        Well at least it put one more nail in the end of the Clintons.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Laura Bernard Mielcarek Says:

        Oh, hellz yeah!!

        Liked by 1 person

  7. petermac3 Says:

    Obama is still in a position to nullify the election results and stay in office. His appearing to be satisfied that the election was fair may very well be the set up to showcase an impartiality and thereby justify his stepping in once Clinton’s surrogate Jill Stein creates enough of a stir. You should start wondering what appointment fat ass offered her new best buddy. My pessimism never fails to come out…ha.

    Like

    • bunkerville Says:

      I don’t believe this is settle for one bit. I can only hope Trump has his Attorneys warmed up and ready to go.

      Like

    • Laura Bernard Mielcarek Says:

      Nullify the election results??? How???? The Constitution does not delegate that authority to the office of president.

      If you are being facetious, please excuse my inability to recognize it. This is just to important to me – I tend to get more than a little nuts about the subject. Something I know I’ve been able to hide completely. 😉

      Liked by 1 person

      • bunkerville Says:

        They are devious beyond what we can imagine. Time will reveal all.

        Liked by 1 person

  8. petermac3 Says:

    Popular vote? Pant suit girl won California by 3.4 million votes… nuff said.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Just Simply Linda Says:

    so much for her word, right? Sigh…I keep telling my husband and son, watch Dec. 19th…its going to get ugly…jmo of course.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      Yes… not sure what the ultimate goal is other than to either steal an election or otherwise disrupt the transition

      Liked by 2 people

      • Just Simply Linda Says:

        YEP…watch on Dec 19…all that I have been reading…that Soros and his minions are up to no good, threatening the electors etc…

        Liked by 1 person


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: