The more we learn about how the Dems run their show, the more absurd it becomes. Super Delegates. So forget how the sucker voters vote, the party chiefs vote counts more than individual votes. It makes third world elections appear more honest. I don’t think this is how our founders planned our elections to be held.
CNN’s Jake Tapper confronted Democratic National Committee chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz over the “rigged” process in New Hampshire that left Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton with the same number of delegates despite Sanders’ 22 point shellacking of Clinton.
“Hillary Clinton lost to Bernie Sanders in New Hampshire by 22 percentage points, the biggest victory in a contested Democratic Primary there since John F. Kennedy,” Tapper explained. “But it looks as though Clinton and Sanders are leaving the Granite State with the same number of delegates in their pockets because Clinton has the support of New Hampshire’s Superdelegates, these party insiders.”
Tapper said, “I’m not sure that, that answer would satisfy an anxious young voter.”
Read more: Daily Caller
BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades! 
September 8, 2023 at 5:20 am
[…] Recall that this is what happened in 2016.DNC Chair Cannot Explain Why Their Nominating Process Is Not Rigged Against Sanders […]
LikeLike
February 13, 2016 at 7:14 am
The Millennials are noticing, and they’re pissed off, too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 13, 2016 at 7:42 am
Some good news then,
LikeLike
February 12, 2016 at 7:48 pm
They highlight inclusiveness and diversity by taking the vote away from the people? Once again the elitists think they are smarter than everyone else! That was priceless!
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 12, 2016 at 9:09 pm
They accuse the GOP of voter suppression. The ultimate voter suppression. Super Delegates.
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 12, 2016 at 12:54 pm
interesting that Tapper harps on the ‘young’ voters….who else could vote for the overgrown hippie, right?
I watched some of the debate last night and had to laugh at Bernie…..”promise them EVERYTHING!”
The way he says we can pay for it is so ridiculous I had to keep laughing!
I just saw your article below…”SOROS supported CHristie?” I haven’t time to read it now but that’s TRUE? My mother is so wise I almost always trust her instincts but she’s l liked Christie the most. Maybe, at 84, she’s slipping? 🙂
LikeLike
February 12, 2016 at 1:05 pm
Christie has a silver tongue but he is a RINO. Period. Only newbie hippies could get on the train for Sanders, a Dem. Forget the whole thing is rigged. I watched a good portion of the debate as well. No one brought up the latest investigation. Poor Huma, she will have to take the fall.
LikeLike
February 12, 2016 at 12:27 pm
Debbie should be forced to sit hooked up to a lie detector setup when she answers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 12, 2016 at 1:06 pm
She may just pass it. I doubt she is even capable of remembering reality she has lied so long and so often.
LikeLike
February 12, 2016 at 2:17 pm
She might pass, but you would see a lot of smoke coming from that machine. LOL
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 12, 2016 at 8:48 am
They’re making the process even easier. Why have a picture I.D. when you don’t even have to go vote?
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 12, 2016 at 9:38 am
Bingo.
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 12, 2016 at 8:23 am
[…] Source: DNC Chair Cannot Explain Why Their Nominating Process Is Not Rigged Against Sanders […]
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 12, 2016 at 7:40 am
Her ‘explanation’ made no sense whatsoever.
LikeLiked by 3 people
February 12, 2016 at 7:42 am
How can the grass roots be assured of “being heard” when it is the party bosses determining the outcome. When was one person’s vote worth more than another in determining the outcome of an elections?
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 12, 2016 at 9:33 am
The only way Debbie Wasser-person Putz makes any sense is that the listener has to be completely stoned on a hallucinogen. I wonder now if Bernie will run as a third-party candidate, or if he is actually a DNC operative …
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 12, 2016 at 9:40 am
I will vote for the later. A shill game. Though he may be surprised at his success and has had second thoughts on a real running of the bulls.
LikeLike
February 12, 2016 at 7:16 am
DWS’s explanation should make sense to all of us who have had our frontal lobes lobotomized.
LikeLiked by 3 people
February 12, 2016 at 7:37 am
As the old saying goes, ‘I’d rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.’
😀
LikeLiked by 3 people
February 12, 2016 at 7:39 am
You guys are clever today! :))
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 12, 2016 at 7:38 am
Excellent analysis as always. Otherwise known as brain dead.
LikeLiked by 2 people