DNC Chair Cannot Explain Why Their Nominating Process Is Not Rigged Against Sanders


The more we learn about how the Dems run their show, the more absurd it becomes. Super Delegates. So forget how the sucker voters vote, the party chiefs vote counts more than individual votes. It makes third world elections appear more honest. I don’t think this is how our founders planned our elections to be held.

CNN’s Jake Tapper confronted Democratic National Committee chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz over the “rigged” process in New Hampshire that left Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton with the same number of delegates despite Sanders’ 22 point shellacking of Clinton.

“Hillary Clinton lost to Bernie Sanders in New Hampshire by 22 percentage points, the biggest victory in a contested Democratic Primary there since John F. Kennedy,” Tapper explained. “But it looks as though Clinton and Sanders are leaving the Granite State with the same number of delegates in their pockets because Clinton has the support of New Hampshire’s Superdelegates, these party insiders.”

Tapper said, “I’m not sure that, that answer would satisfy an anxious young voter.” 

Read more: Daily Caller 

 

20 Responses to “DNC Chair Cannot Explain Why Their Nominating Process Is Not Rigged Against Sanders”

  1. Always On Watch Says:

    The Millennials are noticing, and they’re pissed off, too.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      Some good news then,

      Like

  2. Steve Dennis Says:

    They highlight inclusiveness and diversity by taking the vote away from the people? Once again the elitists think they are smarter than everyone else! That was priceless!

    Liked by 2 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      They accuse the GOP of voter suppression. The ultimate voter suppression. Super Delegates.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. geeez2014 Says:

    interesting that Tapper harps on the ‘young’ voters….who else could vote for the overgrown hippie, right?
    I watched some of the debate last night and had to laugh at Bernie…..”promise them EVERYTHING!”
    The way he says we can pay for it is so ridiculous I had to keep laughing!

    I just saw your article below…”SOROS supported CHristie?” I haven’t time to read it now but that’s TRUE? My mother is so wise I almost always trust her instincts but she’s l liked Christie the most. Maybe, at 84, she’s slipping?🙂

    Like

    • bunkerville Says:

      Christie has a silver tongue but he is a RINO. Period. Only newbie hippies could get on the train for Sanders, a Dem. Forget the whole thing is rigged. I watched a good portion of the debate as well. No one brought up the latest investigation. Poor Huma, she will have to take the fall.

      Like

  4. mcnorman Says:

    Debbie should be forced to sit hooked up to a lie detector setup when she answers.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      She may just pass it. I doubt she is even capable of remembering reality she has lied so long and so often.

      Like

      • mcnorman Says:

        She might pass, but you would see a lot of smoke coming from that machine. LOL

        Liked by 1 person

  5. the unit Says:

    They’re making the process even easier. Why have a picture I.D. when you don’t even have to go vote?

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      Bingo.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. DNC Chair Cannot Explain Why Their Nominating Process Is Not Rigged Against Sanders | Rifleman III Journal Says:

    […] Source: DNC Chair Cannot Explain Why Their Nominating Process Is Not Rigged Against Sanders […]

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Laura Bernard Mielcarek Says:

    Her ‘explanation’ made no sense whatsoever.

    Liked by 3 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      How can the grass roots be assured of “being heard” when it is the party bosses determining the outcome. When was one person’s vote worth more than another in determining the outcome of an elections?

      Liked by 1 person

    • Mustang Says:

      The only way Debbie Wasser-person Putz makes any sense is that the listener has to be completely stoned on a hallucinogen. I wonder now if Bernie will run as a third-party candidate, or if he is actually a DNC operative …

      Liked by 2 people

      • bunkerville Says:

        I will vote for the later. A shill game. Though he may be surprised at his success and has had second thoughts on a real running of the bulls.

        Like

  8. petermc3 Says:

    DWS’s explanation should make sense to all of us who have had our frontal lobes lobotomized.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Laura Bernard Mielcarek Says:

      As the old saying goes, ‘I’d rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.’
      😀

      Liked by 3 people

      • bunkerville Says:

        You guys are clever today! :))

        Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      Excellent analysis as always. Otherwise known as brain dead.

      Liked by 2 people


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: