Obama vetoes NDAA – Defense funding of our military

After spending hours watching Hillary dance rings around the GOP during the hearing yesterday, my tired fingers did not feel compelled to opine in written form. So let us give the attention to the real heroes of the day and every day that keep us warm and safe so we may go about and enjoy our lives while they put theirs on the line.

Obama in a fit of peek, couldn’t get his way totally, so he vetoes the NDAA. Did it get any attention? Did you even know about it? He had the press in for a picture-taking affair. Why did he veto it? Because of nothing to do with defense. Rather, finally funding that monstrosity that McConnell and Boehner foisted on us that striped our military.

Democrats were particularly upset over Republican attempts to circumvent the across-the-board spending cuts known as sequestration that began in 2013, saying they could not accept any increases in military spending without equivalent increases for other programs.

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama on Thursday vetoed the annual defense policy bill that includes troop pay and benefits — as well as historic personnel reforms — making good on a promise to oppose Republicans on spending.

Obama rejected the bill because it funnels about $38 billion in daily DOD expenses through Overseas Contingency Operations, which allowed Republicans to fully fund defense while avoiding a larger debate over removing caps on federal spending.

The 2016 NDAA includes a $515-billion base defense budget that lays out troop pay, personnel benefits and policy for DOD, and the $89-billion war fund called Overseas Contingency Operations. It calls for an historic reform of the 20-year pension system, hikes in Tricare fees, protections for the A-10 Thunderbolt II and a review of troops carrying personal guns on bases, among a raft of other initiatives.

More at Stripes


9 Responses to “Obama vetoes NDAA – Defense funding of our military”

  1. My Article Read (10-23-2015) | My Daily Musing Says:

    […] Obama vetoes NDAA – Defense funding of our military […]

    Liked by 1 person

  2. LadyRavenSDC Says:

    Reblogged this on LadyRaven's Whisky In A Jar – OH! and commented:
    And we are surprised? Not for a second. The “Commander In Chief” who is nothing more than a “Communist in Chief” needs to be dethroned.

    Liked by 3 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      Thanks for the link. His way or the highway.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. Laura Bernard Mielcarek Says:

    Typical…obama vetoes Constitutional spending because he didn’t get his way on unconstitutional spending.

    Liked by 2 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      now that adds some real class here! 🙂

      Liked by 2 people

    • Steve Dennis Says:

      Exactly right Laura, it is all backwards isn’t it? Nobody knows there is a difference between constitutional spending and unconstitutional spending and I think that nobody cares.

      Liked by 3 people

  4. Brittius Says:

    Reblogged this on Brittius and commented:
    Interesting. It also indicates that BHO does not have the muscle that he had been projecting with NDAA.

    Liked by 2 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      Thanks again.


      • Brittius Says:

        You’re welcome.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: