My internet was down yesterday, giving me the opportunity to spend my day watching C-Span and the Planned Parenthood hearing rather than disturbing myself with the latest world news which I will only find out more of by scouring the internet.
But alas. It was a debacle. No videos were available since apparently the Liberal 9th circuit court has put a hold on them. So why then the hearing? The argument seemed to be unfocused, with the chopping up of baby parts for money getting scant attention. More important to the argument were the cuts made to the clips due to bathroom breaks.Thus, the theory was the videos were pre-fabbed to make PP look bad.
But next time, let’s show the videos? Huh? Bonus time– an earlier post whose info did not come up in the discussion.
Planned Parenthood paying $4.3 Million in Medicaid Fraud Settlement – more to come
October 2, 2015 at 8:54 am
[…] The Libs can’t handle the disturbing Planned Parenthood videos […]
LikeLiked by 1 person
October 1, 2015 at 11:51 am
I was speaking with a well-informed non-conservative friend yesterday and asked him if he had been following the Planned Parenthood situation.
“Oh? There were some videos, right? Um. Heard something about it, but I’m not sure.”
Steve Dennis has it right for some of the more activist types (“if they do and they still try to defend PP it will make them appear to be the radicals”). But for some like my friend, they are just exhausted and mind-conditioned and now – increasingly – demoralized.
Come to think of it, are we on the right in a much different state?
LikeLiked by 1 person
October 1, 2015 at 9:41 am
Gad! The videos must be watched to gain understanding of that Planned Parenthood has been doing.
Libtards are such wimps — except when it comes to spending other people’s money.
LikeLiked by 2 people
October 1, 2015 at 9:47 am
All it turned out to be was a rah rah for Planned Parenthood. Disgusting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
September 30, 2015 at 8:08 pm
I have not watched or listened to any of the PP hearing because I believed from the beginning this was nothing but a show hearing and nothing will come from it. But it is interesting to see how the libs are reacting to the videos because they have defended PP but they know they cannot defend this. The truth is they are afraid to watch the videos because if they do and they still try to defend PP it will make them appear to be the radicals and not the pro-life people and that is something they cannot have because it will deflate the “war on women” argument they have been propagating for so long.
LikeLiked by 3 people
October 1, 2015 at 9:46 am
Agree with you. Chafetz did a terrible job of it. I do not think one of the Dems looked at the videos, or would admit to it. The point of the hearing was totally lost.
LikeLike
September 30, 2015 at 12:34 pm
This PP “scandal” is anything but a scandal. Not only do the elected democrats continue their support for PP but their constituents are just as unflappable in their support for these despicable politicians. What a sad commentary on the ever sinking morality of a once Christian country founded on Judeo-Christian ethics. And kudus to the republicans for showing the country that despite controlling both houses are unable to fight the good fight and figure out a strategy to defund the baby killers.
So then let’s move on to important issues like gay rights and global warming while the Middle East burns and Russia, China and Iran fill the power vacumn the women running the government have created with Obama’s blessings.
LikeLiked by 2 people
October 1, 2015 at 10:03 am
And we have this henchman of Boehner, McCarthy to look forward to for another epic fail.
LikeLiked by 1 person
September 30, 2015 at 10:41 am
Richards (and her communist husband) are pure evil. Right down there with H. Clinton, who loves the idea of flushing children (after sucking out their brains for medical research).
LikeLiked by 2 people
September 30, 2015 at 1:55 pm
Had they had the videos for the hearing, they could have easily proven this ghastly procedure. Once again, the GOPers are not up to the task.
LikeLiked by 1 person
September 30, 2015 at 9:55 am
Wow – a typical liberal response from Capehart (is he gay?) “I’m too delicate to watch the videos, but I’ll make a judgement anyway.” And let’s not forget getting our facts from tweets.
Notice Amy refers to pro-life vs pro-choice. Logically, that should be pro-life vs pro-death.
LikeLiked by 2 people
September 30, 2015 at 9:57 am
Yes he is gay. Too delicate indeed. Indeed– pro death is the operative word.
LikeLiked by 1 person
September 30, 2015 at 10:27 am
Well, he’s just too tweet, fer sure… heh
LikeLike