Bill Clinton responsible for gun free zones on military bases

I have been on a road trip, and missed out on posting yesterday, thus slow to post this gem. Once again the Clintons can be found to be a part of the underbelly of the latest massacre of our home front military.

It hasn’t always been the case that only MPs can carry firearms on U.S. military bases. A mere twenty years ago, “gun free zones” made their way to these facilities under the watch of President Bill Clinton.

According to a Washington Times editorial written days after the Nov. 5, 2009 attack on soldiers at Fort Hood, one of Clinton’s “first acts upon taking office… was to disarm U.S. soldiers on military bases.”

Clinton’s actions birthed Army regulations “forbidding military personnel from carrying their personal firearms and making it almost impossible for commanders to issue firearms to soldiers in the U.S. for personal protection.”

In other words, thanks to Clinton, citizens who join the military to use guns to defend liberty abroad cannot practice their constitutional right to keep and bear arms while on active duty at home.

As the Times editorial board put it: “Because of Mr. Clinton, terrorists would face more return fire if they attacked a Texas Wal-Mart than the gunman faced at Fort Hood.”

The same theme ran true at the Navy Yard in DC on September 16. Police were called after the shooter opened fired, and reports indicate it took approximately three to seven minutes for them to arrive. Each minute is an eternity when a lunatic with a weapon decides the “gun free zone” rules do not apply to him.

When Did Military Bases Become 'Gun-Free Zones'?

Thanks Bill.   From Breitbart September 2013.


12 Responses to “Bill Clinton responsible for gun free zones on military bases”

  1. Brian Burchfield Says:

    Not true. This is why Republicans and Conservatives are know as Liars. The bill was passed by DoD in 1992 under Bush Sr.


  2. My Article Read (7-17-2015) | My Daily Musing Says:

    […] Bill Clinton responsible for gun free zones on military bases […]

    Liked by 1 person

  3. bunkerville Says:

    Sure runs in the family.


  4. Steve Dennis Says:

    More blood on Clinton’s hands! It is absolutely insane that those with the most training in firearms are not allowed to carry them for protection, especially in light of ISIS calling for this kind of attack.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      The one soldier was an expert marksman. He was sacrificed for what,


  5. Zip-a-Dee Says:

    Why didn’t Bush change this?

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      Don’t even ask,


      • Zip-a-Dee Says:



  6. Jersey McJones Says:

    Man, you guys will be believe anything you want, huh? And from a third rate rag like the Washington Times, too, huh?

    Soldiers on home bases in peacetime never carried their weapons around with them all the time. The directive relevant to this Times hit-piece came during the Bush administration, Clinton’s regulation simply reiterated that directive.

    So, again, you sleazy, soulless cons are using other people’s dead bodies for your slimy, scummy political hit-jobs. Man, you guys must really hate the American soldier to use them in such a way.



  7. Brittius Says:

    Reblogged this on Brittius.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. petermc3 Says:

    Would we or should we have expected any less from Clinton? Look at the ROE for our military. And as we know while in office the RINO Bushmaster did not use his pen and his phone to end this stupidity. They all share in this PC sickness together.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      Sure runs in the family, stupid is as stupid does,


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: