Clinton’s dirty fingerprints on largest Export-Import Bank loan

Here is the latest scandal reveal of the Clintons that ties together the Import-Export bank, Dow Chemical, the Saudis, a convicted felon, add Huma Hillary’s gal pal, the Clinton Global Initiative and pure greed. A great read.

Few in the odd coalition of Left and Right pushing for reauthorization of the 81-year-old Export-Import Bank have been louder than Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. “It’s wrong that candidates for president, who really should know better, are jumping on this bandwagon,” she said at a May 22 campaign stop in New Hampshire. “It’s wrong, it’s embarrassing. . . . The idea that we would remove this relatively small but vital source of funding for our businesses to compete is absolutely backwards.”

Clinton’s defense of Ex-Import may be motivated by more than mere concern for American businesses. Critics have argued that her family’s byzantine network of political and business interests benefits tremendously from the bank’s low-interest loans, and previous investigations have raised questions about the bank’s independence from the Clintons’ political pressure. One Ex-Im deal in particular stands out in this regard, both for its sheer size and for its remarkable number of connections to Clinton friends, donors, organizations, and acolytes. From a secretive consulting stint by a top Hillary Clinton aide (Huma) that’s raised conflict-of-interest concerns, to the Clintons’ close personal and business relationship with the receiving firm’s CEO, the largest loan in the bank’s 81-year history appears covered in Clinton-family fingerprints.

The Ex-Im Board voted to approve Sadara’s request for a loan on August 22, 2012. By September 27, they had decided on an amount — $4.975 billion, the largest loan in the Ex-Im Bank’s history. Heritage Foundation scholar and Ex-Im Bank expert Diane Katz is surprised by the loan’s size, particularly considering the beneficiaries. “Dow Chemical hardly needs to benefit from subsidies,” she says, “and I suspect that the House of Saud really doesn’t need U.S. taxpayer subsidies.” The Ex-Im Bank describes itself as a “lender of last resort,” providing financing only to companies that cannot fund themselves or earn private financial banking.

Read more National Review

Published on Jun 17, 2015

The Export-Import Bank sends our tax dollars overseas, hurts American jobs, and has a history of corruption. What does Hillary Clinton want to do with it? Put it “on steroids.”
Learn more at


14 Responses to “Clinton’s dirty fingerprints on largest Export-Import Bank loan”

  1. Hillary Clinton spins off her mega bucks from Goldman Sachs | BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades! Says:

    […] Clinton’s dirty fingerprints on largest Export-Import Bank loan […]


  2. My Article Read (7-15-2015) | My Daily Musing Says:

    […] Clinton’s dirty fingerprints on largest Export-Import Bank loan […]


  3. Steve Dennis Says:

    How this woman is still leading in the polls is beyond me! I guess the left is willing to ignore all this as long as they get one of their own in power…

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      I cannot figure it. Yet no one is focusing on all of her corruption since she doesn’t have anyone really running against her.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Cry and Howl Says:

    Does anything that involves Hillary no matter how nefarious actually surprise any of us?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Steve Dennis Says:

      Nothing is surprising any more, is it?!


    • bunkerville Says:

      Yet she bobbles on without so much as a hitch. So far.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Brittius Says:

    Reblogged this on Brittius.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      Thanks so much.


      • Brittius Says:

        You’re welcome.


  6. petermc3 Says:

    Surely using American tax dollars to subsidize a “loan” or “loans’ benefitting Dow Chemical and The House of Saudi engendered and possible engineered by the Clinton posse will have zero impact on either Clinton’s credibility or her skate to the White House. Any scrutinizing and/or objections are no more than pissing into the wind.

    Liked by 2 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      That is about how I felt about posting this. It is a charming read as the author ties the cast of characters together. But who cares, it is so yesterday.

      Liked by 2 people

  7. LadyRavenSDC Says:

    Reblogged this on LadyRaven's Whisky In A Jar – OH!.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      Thanks again


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: