Appeals court slap Obama again on Amnesty. Upholds Texas Injunction

The good news is that the courts are holding tough on Obama when we finally get a hearing. Whether it be FOIA requests, or making the long march to the Supremes. Thank you Texas. First a reminder and then on the latest appeals court ruling

Supreme Court slaps Obama down unanimously once again

Once again the entire Supreme Court knocks down the Obama administration. Funny, this didn’t seem to make the news. This adds up to over 20 unanimous decisions that went against him. His two Supreme picks apparently are not so ready to move to a totalitarian government.

Back to the good news:

A federal appeals court upheld an injunction against President Obama’s new deportation in a ruling Tuesday that marks the second major legal setback for an administration that had insisted its actions were legal.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled in favor of Texas, which had sued to stop the amnesty, on all key points, finding that Mr. Obama’s amnesty likely broke the law governing how big policies are to be written.

“The public interest favors maintenance of the injunction,” the judges wrote in the majority opinion.

Keep reading…





15 Responses to “Appeals court slap Obama again on Amnesty. Upholds Texas Injunction”

  1. Zip-a-Dee Says:

    Came across this which seems to fit with this Bunker – the globalist ‘plant’ continues to worsen, as planned.
    ‘Towards a Militarized Police State in America? Explosive New Revelations over “Jade Helm 15 Exercise” and Potential False Flags’


  2. mcnorman Says:

    After these devastating floods will come the request for federal help…I won’t be holding my breath.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      And the DOJ perhaps will find a way to make their way, surely a Mexican drown.


  3. Steve Dennis Says:

    This is great news and it means amnesty is on hold until SCOTUS rules on it. Unless Obama ignores the ruling because after all he has ignored the first ruling once already.

    Liked by 2 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      You do give a sad reminder that he had told them where to go. But I will take what we can get. To slow him down for a nanosecond is about the best we can hope for these days.

      Liked by 3 people

  4. petermc3 Says:

    Obama’s DAPA is crappa… for now.

    Liked by 2 people

    • bunkerville Says:



  5. geeez2014 Says:

    Is that worded wrong? I’d LOVE to see any of OBAMA’s “DEPORTATION!” That, I don’t think would be shot down except maybe by the 9th circuit, which never met an illegal it didn’t love and treat like an endangered species.

    You are so right; who’s heard he got smacked down by TX? Conservatives, no libs; they just can’t TAKE the truth….and if it happens to their master, they’re REALLY upset.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      We take a bit of pleasure where we can these dark days.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. Laura Bernard Mielcarek Says:

    “Judge Stephen A. Higginson dissented from Tuesday’s ruling, saying he would have left the fight over immigration policy to the White House and Congress, saying Mr. Obama should have broad discretion to decide who gets deported and how he goes about that.

    Just Higginson also said the fight was a political battle, not a legal one…”

    No, no, no, no and absolutely not!!!

    The power delegated to the president by the Constitution is that:

    “…he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed…”

    Nothing in there gives any discretion to the president regarding executing the laws passed by Congress…nothing!

    The fight is absolutely a legal one — it’s about our Supreme Law – the Constitution – and the president’s outright refusal to carry out his Constitutional duties and fulfill his oath of office.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      Very well said. Scary that the one judge could take the position he took. The balance of the scale of Justice is right on the edge.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Laura Bernard Mielcarek Says:

        It is, bunker, it really, really is. Teetering, in fact.

        Liked by 1 person

  7. Brittius Says:

    Reblogged this on Brittius.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      Thanks again for the link.


      • Brittius Says:

        You’re welcome.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: