Appeals court unfriendly to Obama’s illegal immigration move


Wins are few and far between these days. But this one would stall Obama and his latest round of illegals’ reward for stopping by. Looks like the Appeals court wasn’t so friendly. Probably going to the Supremes.

Politico reports:

A federal appeals court signaled Friday that it is unlikely to allow President Barack Obama’s request to go ahead with a new round of relief for illegal immigrants, making it likely that the White House will have to take its legal case to the Supreme Court within days.

The oral arguments before the 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in New Orleans were being closely watched by both sides in the heated immigration debate as a sign of whether the administration will be able to move forward with its plan to grant quasi-legal status and work permits to about 4 million illegal immigrants. Notably, one Republican-appointed judge used the president’s own comments to put the Justice Department on the defensive.

There’s more:

Judge Jennifer Elrod. a Republican appointee, suggested that Obama’s own statements about the program undermined the federal government’s claims that immigration officials retain case-by-case discretion. She referenced a televised town hall meeting in Miami in February when Obama said that there would be consequences for government employees who ignored his directives to grant deferred action to those who are eligible.

8 Responses to “Appeals court unfriendly to Obama’s illegal immigration move”

  1. My Article Read (4-20-2015) (4-21-2015) | My Daily Musing Says:

    […] Appeals court unfriendly to Obama’s illegal immigration move […]

    Like

  2. the unit Says:

    I for getting the last laugh. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s637-5A9Gro

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Steve Dennis Says:

    Looks like we might win one here but the question is, will anyone stop Obama if he decides to ignore the ruling?

    Liked by 2 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      Now that sir is the pivotal question and well asked.

      Liked by 2 people

  4. Laura Bernard Mielcarek Says:

    Oh, please, please, please, with whipped cream and a cherry on top. Fingers crossed for extra insurance.🙂

    Liked by 2 people

    • bunkerville Says:

      I would love to see the breakdown of the supremes who vote, if they take the case.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. petermc3 Says:

    Hillary’s job #1 will be to find a way to illegally purge those pesky federal judges who dare to use facts, follow and apply constitutional guidelines in their decision making.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bunkerville Says:

      Well, the D.C. Court is shot to hell. Good move using this district.

      Like


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: