DNC Wasserman-Shultz spins her head into orbit in defending Obama’s scandals


Something today that might put a smile on your face as Debbie Wasserman-Shultz, head of the DNC spins spins to the point of absurdity. For the first 1:45 minutes she does her thing on Chris Christie. If you don’t have the time, move the clip up as she surpasses her previous idiocy when she defends Obama. Now we know why Christie is on the hot seat. When in doubt, it’s the bridge don’t you know?? Looks like CNN is trying to get back some of their ratings.

From the notes:

Published on Jan 8, 2014

Shortly after big news in the New Jersey traffic scandal broke today, the Democratic National Committee pounced, accusing Christie of engaging in a culture of “retribution” that led to this, despite Christie denying he had no direct knowledge of the scandal. CNN’s Don Lemon asked DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz what the difference is between Christie’s denial of direct knowledge for a scandal and President Obama’s.

Lemon took note of a few scandals where Obama said he had no prior knowledge of a number of scandals his administration faced. “He didn’t know about the NSA spying on allies, he didn’t know about the Obamacare website, he didn’t know that you wouldn’t be able to keep your doctor, so what’s the difference between Christie not knowing at the president not knowing?”

Wasserman-Schultz responded, “The difference is the issue that President Obama said he didn’t know about were policy issues, this is a scandal.” She dismissed the comparison, insisting that Christie has “created a culture in his office” where that type of behavior is permissible and he needs to be held to account for it.

 

13 Responses to “DNC Wasserman-Shultz spins her head into orbit in defending Obama’s scandals”

  1. justturnright Says:

    Your video was pulled by YouTube, B-ville.

    But you can still see it here, although the video itself won’t paste into WP:
    http://www.mediaite.com/tv/don-lemon-grills-dnc-head-why-is-christie-suspicious-if-he-denies-involvement-but-not-obama/

    Like

  2. Mustang Says:

    Your post gave Steve a smile; I’ve been crying all afternoon thinking about all the people we have in this country as insipid as DWS. She ought to be federally regulated.

    Like

    • bunkerville Says:

      She ties with Botox Pelosi in the insipid class.

      Like

  3. Sunday Morning Links: Soviet Era Auto Advertisement | motorcitytimes.com Says:

    […] Bunker: Wasserman-Shultz spins her head into orbit in defending Obama’s scandals Asylum Watch: The Government-Media Complex __ The Greatest Threat To Freedom TMGGB: Common Core and Google’s Bottom Line CC: Boehner’s Doublespeak Proves We Have No Conservative Party FCBZ: Pig Virus Increasing in US Because of Cold & Wet Weather Gator: MISSOURI DEMOCRAT WANTS TO FINE PARENTS FOR NOT TELLING SCHOOLS ABOUT THEIR GUNS […]

    Like

  4. Petermc3 Says:

    DW Schultz got one thing right. She said if she knew nothing and had no knowledge she would release a statement right away. Isn’t that what she does on a consistent basis? Her stature in the democrat party along with the level of respect and admiration she receives, the idea that she has any credibility at all shows the lack of intellectual honesty and curiosity among the print and electronic mediums across the nation. She is the spokesperson for a corrupt political party which contends without reservation that a sophomoric plan by a self important governor’s office insider outweighs the innumerable scandals surrounding the commie in the White House whose praetorian like paramecium must on a daily basis lie, cheat and threaten to keep him and his destructive agenda afloat. But let’s place the real blame where it belongs, squarely on the heads of a majority of americans along with a cowardly and pusillanimous congress and corrupt from the top down judiciary. Keep in mind that it was our color conscious congress, in deference to our president, the first to be elected not on the content of his character but on the color of his skin, that gave us Eric Holder not unlike the majority of our intellectually vapid color conscious electorate that gave us Obalama.

    Like

    • bunkerville Says:

      Very well put. Vapid. I like the word, defines it all. Do they ever think about what they say?

      Like

  5. Steve Dennis Says:

    Thanks for making me smile this afternoon! What a joke!

    Like

    • bunkerville Says:

      Yes, we get a twofer. Ole deb making an a you know what of herself, and enjoying the feeding frenzy over Christie. A good day at the bunker!!

      Like

  6. AKA John Galt Says:

    Reblogged this on U.S. Constitutional Free Press.

    Like

    • bunkerville Says:

      Thanks so much!

      Like

  7. Brittius Says:

    Reblogged this on Brittius.com.

    Like

    • bunkerville Says:

      Thanks again.

      Like

      • Brittius Says:

        You’re welcome.

        Like


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: