Barack Obama’s Surveillance Society

Yesterday I posted a story Obama” ‘Prolonged Detention”, otherwise known as FEMA Camps. Even Rachael Maddow took him on. He posited that it was now permissible to detain without trial as a preemptive move.Now on to part two. Before we get to the heart of the matter via the video, here is a bit of History.

From August, 2012 post: Obama fights injunction against unlawful detention of U.S. citizens

Obama fights the preliminary injunction granted to American Citizens against unlawful imprisonment. But Obama is not through with us yet. They are fighting it big time, and the rationale gets even more creepy. The argument goes something like this, if we are thrown in jail, we can always appeal, even though it may take years to prove our innocence. Guilty until proven otherwise, typical Marxist justice.

On May 16th,federal judge Kathleen Forrest granted a preliminary injunction to plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed against Barack Obama and the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (NDAA),striking down those sections of the Act that provide the president the power to indefinitely detain American citizens without benefit of their 5th and 6th Amendment rights. As a reminder, keep in mind it was Obama that insisted that the language in the NDAA bill include Citizens:Obama lies-he insisted that detention of Americans be in defense bill

“But… It was his administration that insisted that the language be included in the bill”.

From the video: Senator Carl Levin (D-Mich.) told Congress recently that under the original wording of the National Defense Authorization Act, American citizens were excluded from the provision that allowed for detention. Once Obama’s officials saw the text though, says Levin, “the administration asked us to remove the language which says that US citizens and lawful residents would not be subject to this section.”

Under the terms of the Act,Obama had been given exclusive authority to direct members of the US military to arrest and imprison anyone he believed to have “substantially supported” al Qaeda,the Taliban,or “associated forces.” When pressed by plaintiff’s attorneys about the practical extent of this authority,government lawyers admitted “…the NDAA does give the president the power to lock up people like journalist Chris Hedges and peaceful activists,” admitting that “…even war correspondents could be locked up indefinitely under the NDAA.”

Yet incredibly,when pressed on the issue,this Obama mouthpiece suggested to Judge Forrest that concerns about the president’s detention powers were excessive as American citizens would,after all,have the ability to file a writ of habeas corpus should they be illegally or improperly jailed! “How long does [such a] petition take,” asked Forrest? When Torrance refused to answer,the Judge continued,“Several years,right”? (In Yesterday’s post, Obama seemed to think that ten years might be about right) -prolonged detention. Keep that phrase in mind.

Keep this in mind:

On July 2nd, 2008—Obama delivered a speech in Boulder, Colorado in which he promised the creation and establishment of a “Civilian National Security Force.” He further promised it would be “just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded as the US Military.”

It is well known amongst dictators, the world over, that a private army is necessary to control the great unwashed masses over which they force their rule.

We have seen Obama steadily assume dictatorial powers over apathetic Americans in just four and a half years. He has all but hushed the people’s voice in government, the US Congress, by simply by-passing them and ruling by executive order—just like any other two-bit dictator. Some feel even the US Supreme Court has lost the steel from its collective spine under withering pressure from our budding domestic dictator, Obama.
If one did not know better, one would think there is a move afoot to institute a complete Marxist insurgency in America with Obama at the top—and —at the leading edge.
“The things done in every Marxist insurgency are being done in America today.” … Retired Lt. General William G.”Jerry” Boykin says in a new video he has just released . Boykin is a decorated former Delta Force Commander, US Deputy Under Secretary for Defense, and a recipient of the Purple Heart

15 Responses to “Barack Obama’s Surveillance Society”

  1. Teresa Rice Says:

    Obama is dangerous for America. Yes indeed, people need to wake up.


  2. NSA Utah spy center revealed – 100 years of total data stored | BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades! Says:

    […] I posted Barack Obama’s Surveillance Society. Check out the excellent videos. Included in the post is Obama fights injunction against unlawful […]


  3. cmblake6 Says:

    Reblogged this on Cmblake6's Weblog and commented:
    You know how you have those friends you tell about the FEMA camps, and they say “Nah, it could never happen here”? Show them this.


  4. Steve Dennis Says:

    Suddenly the leftist which opposed Bush’s wiretaps are silent, do they not see their own hypocrisy on this issue, of do they simply not care because now it is a Democrat infringing on our rights? Obama has taken this to a whole new level and nobody seems to care!


    • Bunkerville Says:

      I get a hint at times that this may be unwinding. Woodward started the questioning, and now and then we get hits of discomfiture. Even maddow had an issue. This might just get to be a bit of fun yet.


  5. Designs by Dianne Says:

    The ‘lawless’, who make their own laws, will cause the lawful to become lawless, in the eyes of the new LAW. Funded by the very people it’s design to ‘contain’, American tax payers. Thanks for the focus here Bunker. In the foreknowledge of this, Scripture does state certain things will occur. Let’s pray that those in positions of authority will restrain, override and stop what is possible to stop – may they do that now! ‘Woe’ to the wicked.


  6. Jim at Asylum Watch Says:

    Wake up, America!!!

    I’m wondering what false flag event Obama will use as an excuse to turn his Homeland Security loose on Americans?


    • Bunkerville Says:

      Something like a Waco would be my guess. But we must not allow ourselves to be baited. The Colorado sheriffs that will not enforce Colorado’s new law may be something to watch.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: