EPA defies court order- increases ethanol mandate

Totally lawless. Totally. We knew it was coming. Was this Lisa Jackson’s swan song as going out the door. We can only hope the court imposes consequences. Anarchy begins. This blend can be only used in cars 2002 and newer and harms smaller engines such as lawn mowers.  Americans can go to H*ll as far as this President is concerned. And corn prices skyrocket.

Officials at the Renewable Fuels Association, representing the ethanol industry, said ethanol fuels can be safely used in old cars if owners adapt the fuel systems with new parts. Thanks a bunch guys!

Just one week after a federal court rebuked the Environmental Protection Agency for mandating biofuel standards based on “wishful thinking,” the EPA responded by raising those standards to even more unattainable levels.

The EPA called for refiners and importers to mix 14 million gallons of cellulosic biofuels (ethanol) into fuel in 2013. “EPA calculates a percentage-based standard for the following year,” the agency explained in an announcement today. “Based on the standard, each refiner and importer determines the minimum volume of renewable fuel that it must ensure is used in its transportation fuel.”

This projection ignores last week’s ruling from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which struck down a rule requiring gasoline blenders to use 8.65 million gallons of the cellulosic biofuel because the mandate “was based on wishful thinking rather than realistic estimates of what could be achieved,” as The New York Times explained. Per Consumer Energy Report notes, the fuel isn’t commercially available.

The judges faulted the EPA for effectively saying, “Do a good job, cellulosic fuel producers. If you fail, we’ll fine your customers.

Sen. David Vitter, R-La., faulted the EPA for ignoring last week’s ruling. “The EPA continues to make up unicorn-like standards in this area of renewable fuels production, as emphasized by last week’s appellate court ruling,” Vitter said in a statement this afternoon. “Increasing the standard after their 2012 requirements were vacated is beyond ludicrous, and they continue to force refiners to either purchase even more gallons of product that doesn’t exist or pay a fine.” Washington Examiner

From am earlier post Recall this? EPA expected to OK more ethanol ? It will destroy many older engines.

The Environmental Protection Agency is expected to raise the maximum amount of ethanol that can be blended with gasoline for vehicles manufactured since 2007.

According to people with knowledge of the announcement, the EPA may say as soon as Wednesday that the newer vehicles are able to handle 15 percent ethanol, up from the current maximum of 10 percent for the corn-based fuel.

But the auto industry, environmentalists and a broad coalition of other groups have argued against an increase and called for more testing.

Opponents argue that the increase in production of corn and its diversion into ethanol is making animal feed more expensive, raising prices at the grocery store and tearing up the land.

Manufacturers of smaller engines – used in everything from lawn mowers to boats – also oppose increasing the use of the fuel, saying those engines are not designed for the higher concentrations.

Then there is this Lahood: ‘We are going to coerce people out of their cars – apparently after they destroy our cars or make them prohibitively expensive to drive.

15 Responses to “EPA defies court order- increases ethanol mandate”

  1. Wasteful EPA programs get the axe | BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades! Says:

    […] EPA defies court order- increases ethanol mandate February 1, 2013 — bunkerville […]


  2. Steve Dennis Says:

    I missed this story, good find! Why doesn’t this surprise me? Oh yeah, because Obama has a history of ignoring the courts. Lawless is right!


  3. Designs by Dianne Says:

    Similar to tricking people with clunkers for cash – http://clunkersandjunkers.blogspot.com/
    If no on foot now, soon will be when this product hits the pumps.
    Rules: we make them up as we go along … http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2010/03/top-democrat-all-this-talk-about-rules-we-make-them-up-as-we-go-along-video/
    Forced restriction by price increase and manipulation. A twisted and perverted mindset going on here. Sickening. Esp. when there’s alternatives to gas rather than wasting food to mix with it. But, it’s not for Good. Has nothing to do with that. Nor reason. Manifestations of the Liar increasing.
    This is as shocking: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/02/its-an-obama-world-miami-residents-freak-out-after-military-helicopters-fire-shots-over-i-395-video/
    Why conduct these “tests” and secret ‘drills’ ? for public safety? How can that be when low flying aircraft are shooting as it go! Some are blind to the realization, believing it’s for their protection. Justifying it as – whatever it takes to keep our kids safe. Numbing.


  4. Always On Watch Says:

    Lawlessness under the Obama regime rules!


  5. Jim at Asylum Watch Says:

    It’s all down hill from here, Bunker. The rule of law no longer applies in the US if you are the government.


    • bunkerville Says:

      He is testing the waters big time. If he does not receive sanctions from the court we are through. I just read the labor board just made another decision. The same board the court ruled unconstitionsl.


  6. danmillerinpanama Says:

    Reblogged this on danmillerinpanama and commented:
    The Obama Administration seems to be taking the position that judicial decisions are of no consequence unless they uphold its actions. A recent unanimous decision by a three judge panel of the same court, the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, that “recess appointments” made when the Senate is not in recess are invalid also rejected an Obama Administration position and hence is also being ignored.


    • bunkerville Says:

      We have much to fear.


    • bunkerville Says:

      Try this one as well:The Washington Free Beacon reports:
      The two committees are investigating how the IRS decided to implement a specific tax credit created in the Obamacare legislation. The bill allows the federal government to provide a tax credit to certain individuals who purchase health insurance in healthcare exchanges created by the states.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: