Diane Feinstein and Chuck Schumer pack guns -none for us

Amazing isn’t it. The hypocrisy. Feinstein in 1995 on her concealed carry permit: ‘I know the urge to arm yourself because that’s what I did’ Video below. More on her at MRC TV

She states:

“I know the sense of helplessness that people feel. I know the urge to arm yourself because that’s what I did. I was trained in firearms. I walked to the hospital when my husband was sick. I carried a concealed weapon and I made the determination if somebody was going to try and take me out, I was going to take them with me.”

 Not only does Schumer carry a handgun, the New York City Police Department also provides armed escorts for the good senator. In fact, the Government Accounting Office — the investigative arm of the US Congress — slammed Schumer’s use of police resources for personal protection. It’s clear that Schumer believes he’s special. He wishes to ban private citizens’ ownership of firearms, while he enjoys layers of protection.

And then we have Senator Diane Feinstein on the Left Coast who possesses something more rare than a conservative Republican in San Francisco – an unrestricted concealed weapons permit. Apparently without shame, she participated in a citywide gun turn-in program that was intended to create some kind of statue from the donated guns that were to be melted down. One of her police body guards let it slip that she contributed a cheap model for the meltdown, while retaining her .357 magnum revolver for her own personal self-defense.

Hypocrisy is not limited to politicians when it comes to the Second Amendment. For Example, well-known Washington-based columnist, Carl Rowan, often wrote about the ills of firearms ownership. Until, that is, he shot and wounded a teenager who trespassed on his property. The white teenaged boy claimed he wanted to try Rowan’s swimming pool. Rowan, an African-American, retaliated with deadly force using a firearm. That’s when the news came out that Carl Rowan, gun-control advocate, actually possessed a license to own firearms. H/T:Federal Observer

17 Responses to “Diane Feinstein and Chuck Schumer pack guns -none for us”

  1. cmblake6 Says:

    Reblogged this on Cmblake6's Weblog and commented:
    Hypocrisy, you say? This is it’s poster child. Wait, wait, wait, sorry. What was I thinking? Only the politburo is of any value.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. John Scotus Says:

    I don’t know, but the idea of either of these loons having a gun scares the hell out of me. Maybe we should have some sort of gun control legislation after all–the Strip Guns From Liberal Senators Act. Then we could all sleep more soundly at night.


  3. Steve Dennis Says:

    The hypocrisy abounds! I think you nailed it; these people feel they are so important they must be protected so that they can continue to lead us down the right path.


  4. genomega1 Says:

    Reblogged this on News You May Have Missed and commented:
    Diane Feinstein and Chuck Schumer pack guns -none for us


  5. Adrienne Says:

    “They” will have to deal with my cold dead hands.

    BTW – did you know that if you target practice at a target practice place, all those records can be looked at by the “powers that be?” Best to have a friend with lots of land.


  6. silverfiddle Says:

    “OK for me but not for thee” is the liberal motto.


  7. Conservatives on Fire Says:

    I sure do get tired of all of the hypocracy. Gun control advocates know their positions are wrong. They take their positions not because they give a damn about the well being of Americans, but because they want to control Americans.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: