Obama signs new NDAA American detention guidelines

On Thursday, March 1, the die has been cast again as the American Republic entered the post-NDAA era. On March 1, the major provisions of that unconstitutional measure went into legal effect. Then, with another stroke of his pen, President Barack Obama implemented a set of regulations establishing the policies for implementing the immense powers granted him by the National Defense Authorization Act. Thus, he, and we, crossed into uncharted territory.Full Story at  New AMerican
The media have portrayed these directives as a move by President Obama proving the strength and sincerity of his resolve to never deploy the military to detain American citizens without a trial. A closer look reveals that the media blowing of the President’s trumpet is mostly sound and fury, signifying nothing.

Now we get our news from Russian T.V. Thanks Russia. I am a news junkie, but I sure missed the reporting of this gem. H/T: to Commie Blaster for the lead.

Uploaded by on Mar 1, 2012

In December of last year, the US Congress voted to pass the National Defense Authorization Act. The bill will allows the indefinite detention and torture of American citizens without a trial. This week President Obama has tweaked the highly controversial bill making it discretionary for the military to detain suspects, but it still gives him the authority to detain suspects. So does this change restore liberties that were originally stripped? David Seaman, journalist and host of the DL Show, joins us to analyze the changes.

Recall Rand Paul and his speech of what now makes up a Terrorist?

20 Responses to “Obama signs new NDAA American detention guidelines”

  1. Tony M. Fernández Says:

    Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich support this pile. How can anyone expect me to support these apostates?


  2. spreadeagle72 Says:

    Reblogged this on The Spread Eagle Patriot and commented:
    Keep watching Health Care, Fluke, Uganda and talk more about contraception while the FBI is knocking at your door after your next politically incorrect post or some libtard that “whistle blows” on you! Aint life grand? What’s the difference between a patriot and a terrorist? Depends on who you ask of course. Thanks for the post Bunk!


  3. blogsense-by-barb Says:

    Reblogged this on blogsense-by-barb and commented:
    OMG! Obama Must Go!!! Can we get past Fluke and deal with this NOW, Please!!!!!


  4. Steve Dennis Says:

    This is the same bill which also classifies the United States homeland as a battlefield, the powers this government has just given themselves is frightening!


  5. rjjrdq Says:

    I said it before, this isn’t really for us, although we’ll have to suffer through the transition. It’s for the “new America,” the demographic shift full of leftist loons and immigrants with no allegiance to the United States. Not an easy to control population. A truly “United” States would never have allowed this.


  6. TexasFred Says:

    They’re coming to take me away Ha Ha…
    They’re coming to take me away Ho Ho…

    Yeah, more Libertarians, that’s what we need, with Ron Paul leading the way…

    He He Hey Hey Ho Ho
    To the funny farm…


  7. The Conservative Hill Billy Says:

    Russian and The Brits! We are in deep do-do:(


  8. Conservatives on Fire Says:

    Americans are still asleep at the switch, Bunker. The Patriot Act and NDAA have bipartisan support. I fear the MSM is the only tool that could possibly wake people up and the have shown no interest. We are giving up our freedoms without a fight. We need a lot more Bunkervilles and we need them now!


    • bunkerville Says:

      And you as well, Jim. In the end, you may be a lot better off where you live then the USA. Good luck with your next election. Looks like Chavez is not going to make it. Any chance of a turn around?


  9. silverfiddle Says:

    Electing more libertarians like Rand Paul will fix this.


  10. republican mother Says:

    Bearded Spock universe when you have to go to Russia to get some free and independent reporting. They’re just filling a void. Don’t forget what Rowan Gaither said was the aim of the foundations back in 1953: to make life in the United States such that it could be easily merged with the Soviet Union.


    • bunkerville Says:

      It is pretty sad when the leads to stories come from Russian TV. I have noticed more stories are being picked up. Maybe the MSM should go to Russia and cover their news in return?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: