Meet Opompous The Clown

This guy really does not get it and his narcissism is out of control.  Below is his most hysterical quote yet to date.

“Barack Obama says he won’t campaign for any Democrats who vote against the government medicine bill. Somehow, I don’t think that’s going to have the intended effect.”

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2010/03/025848.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+powerlineblog%2Flivefeed+%28Power+Line%29&utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher

Advertisements

State appellate court: Sen. Robert Menendez recall can proceed

Score one more for the Tea Party! Now this will be a message not to be forgotton. Taking our governement back, one at a time. Regardless of the final outcome, a tingle must be going up his leg.

A group of New Jersey tea party activists can proceed in their effort to recall Democratic Sen. Robert Menendez, a state appellate court ruled Tuesday.

 The court ruled that the New Jersey secretary of state must accept petitions the Sussex County Tea Party is planning to gather to put Menendez on the ballot. New Jersey is one of 18 states that allows for recalls of statewide officials, but Menendez’s lawyers had maintained that senators could not be removed from office by that method.

 RoseAnn Salanitri, the founder of the Sussex County Tea Party and the leader of the Committee to Recall U.S. Senator Robert Menendez, called the court decision a victory for the recall campaign.

 “The fight is just beginning to keep our representatives accountable,” Salanitri told POLITICO Tuesday morning. “No way are we lying down and playing dead.”
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/34496.html#ixzz0iMoaumyh

Tea Party Rally in D.C. – Just the Beginning

Just steps from the U.S. Capitol some 200-300 Conservative Tea Party activists gathered with the intention of visiting their respective members of Congress to speak out against the Health Care bill.

“Kill the Bill,” they shouted as the event billed as the “Code Red Rally” began with remarks from Rep. Mike Pence, R-IN.

“I believe these people can stop this bill in the name of freedom,” Pence told me in an interview that will air later tonight on Greta Van Susteren’s “On the Record”.

The “Code Red Rally” was one of two separate tea party actions on the Hill today. http://onthescene.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/03/16/tea-parties-in-washington-d-c/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogs%2Fonthescene+Blogs+-+On+The+Scene

Some nice pics over at The Other McCain: http://theothermccain.com/2010/03/16/live-peoples-surge-vs-obamacare-2-0/

Who is Louise Slaughter?

Comrade Slaughter

Radio talk show host Mark Levin was dead on last week when he said on his show that House Rules Committee chairman Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) should be expelled from Congress for promoting her authoritarian plan for avoiding a vote on ObamaCare. It should surprise no one that Slaughter is a longtime ally of organized crime syndicate ACORN which she voted to keep federal tax dollars flowing to underage girls. http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/03/15/the-slaughter-solution-is-treason-against-the-american-republic/

Which leads to the question: who were the 75 House Democrats who voted not to defund ACORN? They included Majority Whip James Clyburn but not Majority Leader Steny Hoyer. Speaker Nancy Pelosi, as is customary for speakers did not vote, but her Bay Area consiglieri George Miller and Anna Eshoo voted to defund the group. The 75 anti-defunding Democrats included several committee chairmen—Bob Filner, Nick Joe Rahall, Charles Rangel, Louise Slaughter, Bennie Thompson, Edolphus Towns and Henry Waxman—but not others.
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Analysis-of-the-House-ACORN-vote-59666417.html#ixzz0iLhpUREN
She’s not the only one who should be expelled from Congress. Anyone who supports the Slaughter Solution supports the overthrow of the American system of government. Anyone who votes for it should make their peace with the political gods because electoral judgment is coming in November. Regardless of the previous court action, this must not stand.

 

OATH of OFFICE

The oath of office required by the sixth article of the Constitution of the United States, and as provided by section 2 of the act of May 13, 1884 (23 Stat. 22), to be administered to Members, Resident Commissioner, and Delegates of the House of Representatives, the text of which is carried in 5 U.S.C. 3331: has been subscribed to in person and filed in duplicate with the Clerk of the House of Representatives by the following Members of the 111th Congress, pursuant to the provisions of 2 U.S.C. 25:

“I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/03/16/guess-who-opposed-the-slaughter-rule-in-2005/

Islamic Calculus: Women as Functions of Male Lust

So easy to foget one of the major tenets of the Islam, and women’s place in the society’s structure. Where are the women’s groups? We hear nothing.http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/03/16/islamic-calculus-women-as-functions-of-male-lust/#pageTitle Always good to have a refresher.

Jeanette Pryor

by Jeanette Pryo from Newsrealblog

Not only do Islamic women exist for men, according to Islam their very ontological significance is derived from their relation to men. Apart from men, they have no final cause, no purpose. In the precise, mathematical sense of the term, Islamic women are functions of male lust.

“The other day, a pediatric nurse in New York City refused to dance with Mbarek Lafrem, a Moroccan man, in a New York City bar. What did Lafrem do? He followed her into the women’s bathroom where he attempted to rape and savagely beat her. The woman was found unconscious and is now hospitalized. To a certain kind of man, from a certain kind of culture, women are always supposed to say yes, and when they say no they are provokers and deserve a beating. More: If the woman is a naked-faced infidel and dances with strange men in a public setting—she is, by definition, a prostitute and is not entitled to say no. Saying no is a “provocation” and deserves a beating. Or worse.”

At nine, Sharia Law declares that she is old enough to marry. Though she may still sleep with her dolls, her father may sell her to be the plaything of a wealthy man. In very “moderate” Muslim countries, fathers may wait till their daughters reach puberty or even sixteen to dispose of their lives. MEMRI TV provides ample examples of Saudi Clerics scoffing at the idea of allowing girls to wait till they are eighteen to start their role in life of servicing male lust.

Once married, a woman is required to remain in the home unless accompanied by a male of her household. Without this protection, she could be raped in the streets while shopping or even be seduced. Because men cannot be expected to be satisfied with only one woman to accommodate their perpetual need for sex, Muslim women can expect to share their husbands with up to three other permanent wives and as many “temporary wives,” as he needs. Cont….http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/03/16/islamic-calculus-women-as-functions-of-male-lust/#pageTitle

Marxist Takeover Without Firing a Shot?

Here is a great read from David Limbaugh, and well worth reading the entire rant.

During the height of the Cold War, some feared the communists would take over the United States without firing a shot. Could it be that nearly a half-century later, we’re on the verge of that becoming a reality?

President Barack Obama and Democratic congressmen won their respective elections — no shots were fired — and they are feverishly attempting to dismantle this nation’s institutions, brick by brick.

The American people are getting a bird’s-eye view of what the left, which completely dominates the Democratic Party, thinks of the Constitution, freedom and the right of the people to self-governance.

The people now attempting to govern us with an iron fist are Marxist-leaning in terms of not only the policies they support but also the ruthless tactics they employ to enact those policies into law.

As long as it served Obama’s Machiavellian purposes to maintain a semblance of unity for his ambitious agenda, he donned his bipartisan cap. But as soon as he encountered intractable opposition from Republicans, God bless them, he began to show his true political colors.

Barack Obama’s congenial, compromising facade has disappeared. What remains, in plain view, is a narcissistic, arrogant and inflexibly ideological man who is determined to cram his socialist agenda down our throats by whatever means necessary — irrespective of the legality of the procedures he utilizes, the truth of the words he speaks and the will of the people.

Obama doesn’t care what we think — and I’m not just talking about the majority of Americans who oppose Obamacare. Everyone who gets in his way is expendable, including principled Democrats who dare to oppose him.

Obama and his congressional cronies are systematically subverting the Constitution to advance their agenda. They have tried every trick in the book to pass Obamacare, such as lying about many substantive provisions in the bill and their inevitable effects on quality, price and choice. Cont…http://www.creators.com/conservative/david-limbaugh/without-firing-a-shot.html

%d bloggers like this: