What may I ask is Ginsburg doing over in Egypt? The former head of the ACLU is going to advise them on their Constitution? H/T: Right Scoop
Transcript below the video
Current US Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg proved her contempt for the US Constitution when she told Egyptian Al-Hayat TV on January 30, 2012 that when Egypt drafts their own constitution they should not look at the US Constitution, but rather to that of South Africa or Canada that “embraces basic human rights”:
MEMRI – Ruth Bader Ginsburg: It is a very inspiring time – that you have overthrown a dictator, and that you are striving to achieve a genuine democracy. So I think people in the United States are hoping that this transition will work, and that there will genuinely be a government of, by, and for the people.
[...]
I met with the head of the elections commission. I think that the first step has gone well, and that elections have been held for the lower house that everyone has considered to be free and fair. So that’s one milestone, and the next will be the drafting of a constitution.
I can’t speak about what the Egyptian experience should be, because I’m operating under a rather old constitution. The United States, in comparison to Egypt, is a very new nation, and yet we have the oldest written constitution still in force in the world.
[...]
Let me say first that a constitution, as important as it is, will mean nothing unless the people are yearning for liberty and freedom. If the people don’t care, then the best constitution in the world won’t make any difference. So the spirit of liberty has to be in the population, and then the constitution – first, it should safeguard basic fundamental human rights, like our First Amendment, the right to speak freely, and to publish freely, without the government as a censor.
[...]
You should certainly be aided by all the constitution-writing that has gone one since the end of World War II. I would not look to the US constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012. I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, had an independent judiciary… It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done. Much more recent than the US constitution – Canada has a Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It dates from 1982. You would almost certainly look at the European Convention on Human Rights. Yes, why not take advantage of what there is elsewhere in the world?



February 7, 2012 at 6:31 pm
[...] me give you the Bunkerville one, with video, while I’m at it. Like this:LikeBe the first to like this post. from → 1776v2.0, [...]
February 6, 2012 at 8:08 am
http://cmblake6.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/this-is-the-oath-many-of-us-have-sworn/
February 6, 2012 at 8:13 am
Excellent post; It would be good if Congress as well would take a look,.
February 6, 2012 at 12:00 am
Can’t expect anything less from a leftist. Ginsburg’s only one good reason why Democrats shouldn’t be allowed to appoint anybody to anything.
February 6, 2012 at 8:09 am
HEAR, HEAR!!!!!!!!!!!!
February 6, 2012 at 8:16 am
She was approved 96-3. So much for the GOPers.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg White Jun 14, 1993 96-3 No. 232 C Aug 3, 1993
February 5, 2012 at 11:00 pm
Ginsburg is obviously too delusional to be on the SCOTUS, damn shame appointments are for life, or until they retire with dignity…
I don’t think that old bat knows what dignity is…
February 6, 2012 at 8:09 am
Indeed!
February 6, 2012 at 8:14 am
And Obama got to pick two more of her kind.
February 6, 2012 at 4:17 pm
When/If it ever gets proven illegitimate, they’re gone WITH it.
February 5, 2012 at 8:54 am
Gah!
Typical Leftist embrace of a radical Islam movement, recently known as “The Arab Spring.”
February 5, 2012 at 10:58 am
Pretty sickening.. and a couple more of her stripe are on the Court.
February 6, 2012 at 8:11 am
*AHEM* For life.
February 5, 2012 at 12:18 am
and by the way, doesn’t it warm your heart when leftists have to give muslim countries interviews dissing us? (@*&@#$(*&
February 5, 2012 at 5:58 am
Good point!!
February 5, 2012 at 12:17 am
I think she should be thrown off the court, too………way too scary to think of a justice who doesn’t trust in our constitution………”embrace human rights”..ours doesn’t? Well, maybe so; ours doesn’t guarantee the government pays for EVERYTHING for EVERYONE. If she’s not a Marxist, I don’t know who is. YIkes.
February 5, 2012 at 5:57 am
Thank you Orin Hatch who brought us this little number. Anyone want to bet that the two newbies think the same way?
February 6, 2012 at 4:19 pm
No bets. But this is an OBVIOUS violation of her oath to support and defend, and smacks strongly of treasonous behavior.
February 4, 2012 at 9:10 pm
What is the definition of treason again?
Notice the documents she cites were all products of the political rearrangements of our friends the banksters. Their definition of human rights ain’t your Bill of Right’s definition.
February 5, 2012 at 5:55 am
something isn’t it? The internet is great!
February 4, 2012 at 10:01 am
That miserable cow needs to be out of the SCOTUS. “Support and Defend the Constitution” ring any bells? Well, the appointment is “for LIFE” or until retirement. Options?
February 4, 2012 at 10:47 am
Let us just hope she stays put until we have a GOPer in the WH. I am surprised she doesn’t retire so that Zero gets another pick. That would be more than I could think about.
February 6, 2012 at 4:21 pm
THAT is frakking scary as a thought, BUT when it is proven illegitimate anything it has done is null and void.
February 4, 2012 at 8:10 am
And this is a sitting Supreme Court Justice, despicable!
February 4, 2012 at 8:27 am
She should be thrown off the court. Running around trashing us is unbelieveable. Things are going swell in Egypt. Secretary of Tramsportation Vilsack’s son cannot get out and is staying at the embassy for looking into the election process.
February 7, 2012 at 2:08 am
Oh, you mean like Jimmuh Cahtuh? Bitch needs to be off the Court.