I have nothing against 48 species. I do have something against making part of Hawaii a new country. All part of the deal:
Bill Allowing Native Hawaiians to Establish Own Gov’t Poised to Pass Two Congressional Committees
The legislation had been expected to easily win the committees’ approval, but Hawaii’s governor and attorney general voiced objections late Tuesday to some of the changes that sponsors plan to propose. In light of the objections, Republican lawmakers have asked for a delay. Democrats, however, sensing they have the votes to prevail, are determined to proceed.
The legislation, known as the Akaka bill after its lead sponsor, Sen. Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, has a long history. The bill would provide a road map to gradually establish a Native Hawaiian government.http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/58620
Once established, the Native Hawaiian government would negotiate with the state and the federal government over which assets it would own. Currently, the state administers 1.2 million acres of former monarchy land. Some of that land, which is quite valuable, could eventually revert to the new government
See our earlier post: http://bunkerville.wordpress.com/2009/12/16/hawaiian-and-native-americans-on-the-road-to-victory/
Back now to the Birds:
Wildlife officials lauded Washington’s “holistic approach” to conservation in Hawaii after the Obama administration declared 48 species as endangered and announced plans to set aside more than 40 square miles on Kauai as critical habitat to allow the plants and animals to flourish.
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said the government would also be declaring more than 40 square miles on Kauai as critical habitat, a move that would help the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service adopt a new approach to protecting imperiled species by restoring health to the broad ecosystems they inhabit.




March 11, 2010 at 10:02 pm
The hawaiians never joined the united states. It was the criminals who overthrew our queen who joined hawaii to the US. The hawaiians also protested the annexation of our islands but the US went ahead and annexed it anyway. Annexation, like colonization, is just another kind of theft, a different sort of crime. A crime by any other word is yet a crime. Just because the whiteman refuses to admit that a crime occurred dose not mean that one did not. The whiteman is just trying to pull another one of his sleazy legal tricks.
March 12, 2010 at 1:43 pm
Point taken. However, I would clarify the point further to say that the Blount report under Cleveland acknowledge that the deposing the queen was indeed illegal. Again that was acknowledge by Clinton in the 90′s. [May have been the start of the US apology that was the impetus for such wrong headed thinking]. I say wrong headed as it only leads to division by race. Hey – where did diversity go?
Anyway – the fact remains that plantation owners who wanted to keep Hawaii a territory, was broken by activist descendants of original immigrant laborers. Because they were born in a U.S. territory, they were legal U.S. citizens. And they used it. Expecting to gain full voting rights, these descendants, and native Hawaiians actively campaigned for statehood for the Hawaiian Islands. Welcome to the USA.
March 12, 2010 at 1:56 pm
And thus, as Citizens, received all the rights and benefits of being a US Citizen. Why is there such disagreement now about this bill? Because, these individuals will no longer be elgible of the benefits enured as US citizens.
March 11, 2010 at 2:01 pm
Its not the 48 species…
In 1959 Native Hawaiians joined their Anglo and Asian-American neighbors in voting for statehood by a 17-1 margin. By contrast, American Indian tribes never voted to join the union; they were subjugated by force that was extended by treaty. Rep. McClintock (CA) has stated: “They enjoy certain rights of sovereignty within their tribal lands; this bill extends a separate system of governance with separate rights to any Hawaiians with racial ancestry predating Western contact, and keep in mind that 40 percent of Native Hawaiians don’t even live in Hawaii.”
A separate government based on race? The precedent it would set for other groups [for example the Amish, not that they would ...but think of the implication] could lead to a separate tax based on race. There is something very wrong with that.
March 11, 2010 at 2:21 pm
Then its goodbye to California– Spanish were there long before we set up shop, then its goodbye Florida, Texas..then…wait, when was it the Vikings passed through??
March 11, 2010 at 2:45 pm
Hey Florida / Texas ..wasn’t that Aaron Burr’s plan?? Wonder when the Irish settled Minooka. They’ve been looking to secede from the city of Scranton for years now…this just might do the trick.
March 11, 2010 at 1:18 pm
Why is this a bad thing, in your estimation?